Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Sign in
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • For Lawyers
    For Lawyers
    Here, you’ll find the regulatory trends and hidden market shifts that others miss. You’ll learn where markets (and your clients’ industries) are heading—and how to…
    Show More
    Latest News
    Meta Bets Big on Smart Glasses, But Money is on Ads, Not Hardware
    July 15, 2025
    OpenAI–Google AI Browser War Exposes Limits of EU Tech Rules
    July 14, 2025
    Brussels Pressures Italy to Lift Golden Power Hurdles on UniCredit Deal
    July 14, 2025
    Lloyds, Barclays, Santander’s £6 billion Risk Hinges on July UK Supreme Court Ruling
    July 14, 2025
  • For Investors
    For Investors
    Regulatory events move markets—often faster than earnings reports. A merger approval or a hefty fine can send a stock soaring or sinking in a day.…
    Show More
    Latest News
    Bank Pekao: On Its Way to lead Poland’s financial sector
    July 14, 2025
    Nexi: Solid Numbers With Regulatory Events as Catalysts
    July 14, 2025
    Ercros: A Risky Bet With a Good Margin is Coming to an End
    June 25, 2025
    Zalando: two upcoming regulatory events may have minor upside
    June 23, 2025
  • News
    News
    Stay informed with our global antitrust news compilation—bringing you the latest developments, regulatory updates, and key cases from around the world, all in one place
    Show More
    Latest News
    Poland accuses Biedronka and Transport Firms of Labour Market Collusion
    July 15, 2025
    EU to Expand Foreign Subsidy Probes Amid China Tensions
    July 15, 2025
    Microsoft Races to Avoid EU Antitrust Showdown Over Cloud Practices
    July 15, 2025
    Leipzig Court Orders Meta to Pay €5,000 in Facebook Data Privacy Case
    July 14, 2025
  • Why Join?
  • Memberships
Reading: Microsoft Races to Avoid EU Antitrust Showdown Over Cloud Practices
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Why Join?
  • Memberships
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Microsoft Races to Avoid EU Antitrust Showdown Over Cloud Practices

Editorial
Last updated: July 15, 2025 10:30 am
Editorial
Published July 15, 2025
Share
Photo by Shekai on Unsplash

Microsoft is ramping up efforts to avert a formal antitrust probe in Europe, submitting a revised proposal to address concerns raised by European cloud providers amid a long-running dispute over alleged anti-competitive practices.

The company is seeking to settle complaints filed by CISPE (Cloud Infrastructure Services Providers in Europe), which had accused Microsoft of imposing unfair terms and inflated licensing fees for running its software on rival cloud platforms. Microsoft has presented new commercial terms to CISPE, marking the latest chapter in a saga that has drawn increasing scrutiny from European regulators and watchdogs, techradar reported.

CISPE confirmed it received Microsoft’s latest proposal “within the deadline demanded by the memorandum of understanding signed in July 2024.” The proposal is currently under review, with CISPE expected to issue a response in the coming weeks.

According to reports by The Register, the offer is believed to include reductions in Service Provider License Agreement (SPLA) fees—potentially reversing a prior 10% increase—and could remove obligations for service providers to share customer lists with Microsoft.

The submission follows Microsoft’s failure to meet a key deadline in 2023 to launch Azure Local, a European-specific version of its cloud infrastructure, which was part of a previous settlement agreement. That missed deadline led to renewed negotiations and heightened skepticism about the company’s commitment to competition in the region.

Microsoft’s conduct has also been the subject of public evaluation by the European Cloud Competitive Observatory (ECCO). In its most recent report published in May 2025, ECCO issued Microsoft an “Amber” rating—the second consecutive such rating for the tech giant—indicating ongoing concerns about market behavior. However, the report also noted that Microsoft had maintained a “cooperative working relationship” with authorities.

CISPE Secretary General Francisco Mingorance commented on the ongoing negotiations, saying: “It is disappointing that the proposed product did not deliver, but this is not the end of the Agreement.”

Microsoft has not publicly commented on the latest developments, despite multiple media inquiries. The company remains under mounting pressure to resolve the issue as EU regulators weigh whether further intervention will be necessary.

As cloud services continue to expand in importance across Europe, Microsoft’s efforts to placate competition concerns may prove critical not only to its regional operations but also to broader questions of digital sovereignty and fair access in Europe’s evolving cloud ecosystem.

You Might Also Like

Korea’s Antitrust Regulator Seeks Public Input on Broadcom Case Settlement

Grieg Seafood Slides 4% Amid Weak Q1 and Rising Legal Risks

China’s Antitrust Probe into Google: A New Trade Battle

UK Antitrust Regulator Signals Potential Shift in Global Merger Oversight

Brazil Investigates Price Fixing in Real Estate Sector

TAGGED:antitristCISPEcloudEUmicrosoft

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?