Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Sign in
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • For Lawyers
    For Lawyers
    Here, you’ll find the regulatory trends and hidden market shifts that others miss. You’ll learn where markets (and your clients’ industries) are heading—and how to…
    Show More
    Latest News
    Meta Bets Big on Smart Glasses, But Money is on Ads, Not Hardware
    July 15, 2025
    OpenAI–Google AI Browser War Exposes Limits of EU Tech Rules
    July 14, 2025
    Brussels Pressures Italy to Lift Golden Power Hurdles on UniCredit Deal
    July 14, 2025
    Lloyds, Barclays, Santander’s £6 billion Risk Hinges on July UK Supreme Court Ruling
    July 14, 2025
  • For Investors
    For Investors
    Regulatory events move markets—often faster than earnings reports. A merger approval or a hefty fine can send a stock soaring or sinking in a day.…
    Show More
    Latest News
    Bank Pekao: On Its Way to lead Poland’s financial sector
    July 14, 2025
    Nexi: Solid Numbers With Regulatory Events as Catalysts
    July 14, 2025
    Ercros: A Risky Bet With a Good Margin is Coming to an End
    June 25, 2025
    Zalando: two upcoming regulatory events may have minor upside
    June 23, 2025
  • News
    News
    Stay informed with our global antitrust news compilation—bringing you the latest developments, regulatory updates, and key cases from around the world, all in one place
    Show More
    Latest News
    Poland accuses Biedronka and Transport Firms of Labour Market Collusion
    July 15, 2025
    EU to Expand Foreign Subsidy Probes Amid China Tensions
    July 15, 2025
    Microsoft Races to Avoid EU Antitrust Showdown Over Cloud Practices
    July 15, 2025
    Leipzig Court Orders Meta to Pay €5,000 in Facebook Data Privacy Case
    July 14, 2025
  • Why Join?
  • Memberships
Reading: Poland accuses Biedronka and Transport Firms of Labour Market Collusion
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Why Join?
  • Memberships
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Poland accuses Biedronka and Transport Firms of Labour Market Collusion

Editorial
Last updated: July 15, 2025 11:03 am
Editorial
Published July 15, 2025
Share
https://prowly-prod.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/uploads/8222/assets/653920/-5e8668bef71fb32aec321ef6629a6a6c.jpg

Poland’s Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (UOKiK) has brought charges against retail giant Jeronimo Martins Polska, owner of the Biedronka supermarket chain, and 32 transportation companies, alleging a secret pact to limit competition for drivers—a form of labor market collusion known as a “no-poach” agreement.

UOKiK President Tomasz Chróstny announced that the authority has also initiated proceedings against eight managers and company owners, suspected of directly participating in or overseeing the anti-competitive arrangement.

According to UOKiK, the agreement may have restricted drivers’ ability to switch employers within the network of transportation firms servicing Biedronka’s distribution centers. The alleged objective was to prevent wage competition and reduce staff turnover by blocking drivers from being hired by rival firms, even if they met all the qualifications.

In one illustrative case, a driver reportedly left his job due to stagnant wages and attempted to join another carrier operating at the same Biedronka center. Despite his experience, his application was allegedly rejected due to an unwritten agreement between companies, leaving him unemployed for several months.

“We suspect that transportation companies and Jeronimo Martins Polska concluded an agreement aimed at restricting drivers from moving between firms servicing Biedronka distribution centers,” said Chróstny. “Such practices not only violate competition law but are also unacceptable from a human perspective. Every individual should have the right to freely choose and change their workplace.”

According to the investigation, the arrangement may have involved centralized coordination by Biedronka, which allegedly oversaw and enforced the agreement across its logistics network. Companies may have agreed on a “cooling-off” period—often three months—during which drivers leaving one firm could not be hired by another within the same network, effectively limiting their mobility and earning potential.

So-called “no-poach agreements” are illegal under Polish and EU competition law, as they directly affect key elements of employer competition, such as wage levels and employee mobility. Such pacts can suppress salaries or prevent them from rising in a competitive labor market.

The case reflects growing international attention to antitrust violations in labor markets, where collusion can harm workers just as price-fixing harms consumers.

Companies found guilty of participating in such anti-competitive agreements face fines of up to 10% of their annual turnover, while individuals responsible may face personal penalties of up to PLN 2 million (approx. €460,000).

You Might Also Like

U.S. Department of Justice Considers Breaking Up Google

EU Takes Action on Safer and Fairer E-Commerce

Portugal Opens In-Depth Investigation into Idealista’s Acquisition of Portal47

Hungary Expands Investigation into Retail Chains in Ongoing Price-Fixing Case

Competition Commission of South Africa: Recent Decisions on M&A

TAGGED:Biedronkano-poach agreementPolandtransportation companiesUOKiK

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?