Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Reading: U.S. Merger Changes Will Increase Timelines, Costs for Companies
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

U.S. Merger Changes Will Increase Timelines, Costs for Companies

Editorial
Last updated: March 10, 2025 9:45 am
Editorial
Published June 30, 2023
Share

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ) have recently unveiled a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking aimed at revising the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Premerger Notification Form and associated instructions. 

Photo by Wesley Tingey on Unsplash

The proposed changes seek to modernize the information collection process and increase the effectiveness and efficiency of the merger review process. If implemented, these revisions will significantly impact the burden and time required for HSR filings. 

“The information currently collected by the HSR form is insufficient for our teams to determine, in the initial 30 days, whether a proposed deal may violate the antitrust laws,” FTC Chair Lina Khan said in a statement.

The proposed rulemaking introduces several notable additions to the HSR filing requirements. Some of the significant changes include:

Transaction Rationale and Investment Details: 

Parties to a merger will be required to provide comprehensive details regarding the transaction rationale, including information on investment vehicles, corporate relationships, and previous acquisitions. These additions aim to enhance the agencies’ understanding of the underlying motivations and strategic considerations behind the proposed merger.

Horizontal and Non-Horizontal Business Relationships: 

The proposed changes mandate the disclosure of relevant overlapping products or services, as well as non-horizontal business relationships such as supply agreements. This expansion in scope allows for a more thorough assessment of potential competition issues.

Projected Revenue Streams and Market Analysis: 

Merger parties will need to provide data on projected revenue streams, transactional analyses, and internal documents addressing market conditions. These additional insights into market dynamics will assist the agencies in evaluating the potential impact of the proposed transaction on competition.

Labor Market Impact: 

The proposed rulemaking requires information related to the proposed transaction’s impact on labor markets. The classification of employees based on the Standard Occupational Classification system categories will help identify any potential labor market issues arising from the merger.

Foreign Subsidies: 

To address concerns regarding foreign subsidies that could distort competition or impact business strategies post-acquisition, the proposed changes incorporate requirements to disclose information on subsidies received from certain foreign governments or entities. This provision aligns with the Merger Filing Fee Modernization Act of 2022.

Implications and Challenges: 

The proposed revisions to the HSR Form signal a significant increase in the amount of information required from merging parties. These changes bring the HSR filing process closer to the merger control requirements of other jurisdictions, such as the European Union. As a result, the burden of gathering and maintaining the necessary information for HSR filings is expected to substantially escalate.

Moreover, the expanded disclosure requirements are likely to extend the preparation time for HSR filers, consequently prolonging transaction timelines. Companies should be prepared for increased scrutiny during the initial 30-day waiting period, as the proposed changes aim to enable more effective screening of potential competition issues within this timeframe.

However, concerns have been raised that the additional requirements may disproportionately affect companies, particularly those engaged in transactions that do not raise significant antitrust concerns. The proposed changes could impose substantial costs on parties involved in mergers that pose no antitrust issues.

You Might Also Like

Brazil Investigates Price Fixing in Real Estate Sector

EU Commission Probes ADNOC’s Planned Acquisition of Covestro Over Foreign Subsidy Concerns

Musk Faces FTC Antitrust Review on Twitter Purchase and 9% Stake

Scrutiny Intensifies: US Antitrust Regulators Focus on AI Industry Investments

Teresa Ribera Missed the Shot, AI Cartels, Food Pricing: Day 2 of the ICN

TAGGED:antitrustbusinessDOJftcHSR FormM&Amerger

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Zalando’s EU Court Loss Harmless; Real Threats Are Weak Demand, Shein and Temu

Editorial
Editorial
September 4, 2025
Covestro’s 10% Drop: Merger Arbitrage Opportunity or Value Trap?
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?