Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Sign in
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Mergers
    Mergers
    Identify regulatory challenges and understand how they impact deal closing to gain the insights needed to make informed decisions.
    Show More
    Latest News
    Portugal Opens In-Depth Investigation into Idealista’s Acquisition of Portal47
    June 3, 2025
    Aura Minerals Acquires Serra Grande Gold Mine in Brazil
    June 2, 2025
    SalMar’s Wilsgård Merger Strengthens Core Operations, Yet Legal Risks Could Weigh on Stock
    June 2, 2025
    Brazil Recommends Structural Remedies for Bimbo’s Acquisition of Wickbold
    May 28, 2025
  • Market Intelligence
    Market Intelligence
    Explore the risks and opportunities arising from regulatory decisions to understand their impact on companies and markets, ensuring your company and clients benefit.
    Show More
    Latest News
    Tariffs, Lawsuits, and a Cash Crunch: Stellantis’ Risk Pile-Up
    June 3, 2025
    How Investor Filings Can Strengthen Your Legal and Strategic Arguments
    May 29, 2025
    Pets at Home Rallies on Vet Growth—But CMA Risk Lurks Larger Than for CVS
    May 28, 2025
    Grieg Seafood Slides 4% Amid Weak Q1 and Rising Legal Risks
    June 2, 2025
  • News
    News
    Stay informed with our global antitrust news compilation—bringing you the latest developments, regulatory updates, and key cases from around the world, all in one place
    Show More
    Latest News
    Chile Seeks $74M Fine Against Pedidos Ya and Glovo Over Market-Sharing Deal
    June 3, 2025
    EU Slaps €329M Fine on Delivery Hero and the Stock Price Rises. Why?
    June 2, 2025
    German Antitrust Watchdog Challenges Amazon’s Marketplace Price Controls
    June 2, 2025
    UK Begins BNPL Regulation Process, with New Rules Expected in 2026
    May 29, 2025
  • Memberships
Reading: FTC Backs DOJ’s Google Remedy Plan, Citing Privacy Safeguards
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • Home
  • Mergers
  • Market Intelligence
  • News
  • Memberships
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
Google
News

FTC Backs DOJ’s Google Remedy Plan, Citing Privacy Safeguards

Editorial
Last updated: May 12, 2025 8:08 am
Editorial
Published May 12, 2025
Share
Photo by Farhat Altaf on Unsplash

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has expressed its support for a key proposal by the Department of Justice (DOJ) that seeks to compel Google to share certain search data with competitors, as part of ongoing efforts to remedy the company’s unlawful dominance in the online search market, Reuters reported.

The FTC—widely regarded as the nation’s primary privacy regulator—affirmed that the DOJ’s data-sharing proposal includes sufficient safeguards to protect user privacy, mirroring the Commission’s own standards for enforcement in privacy cases.

The endorsement comes amid the remedy phase of a landmark antitrust trial, following an August 2024 ruling by U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta that found Google had violated federal antitrust laws by spending billions of dollars to entrench its monopoly status. Judge Mehta concluded that Google had unfairly maintained its dominance by making lucrative agreements with major players like Apple, Samsung, AT&T, and Verizon to secure its position as the default search engine across devices, particularly on mobile.

“The court reaches the following conclusion: Google is a monopolist, and it has acted as one to maintain its monopoly,” Mehta wrote in the decision. Google currently commands approximately 90% of the online search market, and up to 95% on mobile devices.

As the court now weighs potential remedies, the DOJ and several state attorneys general are advocating for sweeping structural changes, including the divestiture of Google’s Chrome browser and a ban on exclusive agreements that make Google the default search engine. A key element of the DOJ’s proposal is to establish a compliance committee to oversee implementation and ensure ongoing adherence to the remedy, a mechanism the FTC compared to its own oversight protocols in privacy settlements.

Google, however, has strongly opposed the data-sharing provision, with CEO Sundar Pichai warning that it risks compromising user privacy and exposing the company’s intellectual property. Pichai also testified last month that Google is exploring a partnership with Apple to integrate its Gemini AI technology into Apple devices later this year, a move that DOJ attorneys argue could further entrench Google’s dominance—this time in the emerging AI sector.

Meanwhile, AI startup Anthropic, in which Google holds a multibillion-dollar minority stake, has also weighed in. The company warned in court filings that a DOJ requirement for Google to provide advance notice of AI investments could chill innovation and deter investment in smaller AI firms. “Such a requirement would harm, not benefit, AI competition,” Anthropic argued.

The remedy phase of the trial is expected to continue through May, with a final decision potentially reshaping not only the search market, but also the competitive landscape of the broader digital economy. Legal experts anticipate that appeals to the D.C. Circuit Court and possibly the Supreme Court could extend proceedings into 2026.

While Google has begun making some of its agreements non-exclusive in a bid to address regulators’ concerns, the DOJ and its allies remain skeptical, citing fears that the company may replicate its search dominance in the AI ecosystem without robust structural remedies.

The outcome of this case could mark a pivotal turning point in U.S. antitrust enforcement, especially in relation to Big Tech’s market power, and set the stage for how competition policy is applied to fast-evolving digital markets.

You Might Also Like

Spain Urges Overhaul of RFEF’s Tender for Football Broadcast Rights

Brazil Dismisses Notification in Azul-Gol Codeshare Agreement Case

Judge Denies Musk’s Injunction Request Against OpenAI, Expedites Trial

Google Search Probed By CMA, Meta’s Ads Could Be Next

Telefónica Prepares to Exit Chile as Part of Latin America Strategy Shift

TAGGED:DOJftcgooglePrivacy safeguardsUSA
Popular News

Weekly Newsletter

Impress your colleagues, boss or clients with our weekly unique insights
funeral
News

Spain Fines Mémora for Breach of Merger Commitments

Editorial
Editorial
May 8, 2025
Italian Competition Authority Investigates Eni Plenitude for Alleged Unfair Commercial Practices
European Commission Reconsiders Investigations Into Tech Giants
Australia Opens Competition Probe into Potential Lactalis–Fonterra Deal
Facebook Offers Commitments in French Antitrust Probe
Antitrust Intelligence

About US

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Mergers
  • Market Intelligence
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About US
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe US

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?