Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Reading: Siemens-Alstom Likely to Derail Unless High-Speed Trains Are Divested
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
Lawyers

Siemens-Alstom Likely to Derail Unless High-Speed Trains Are Divested

Editorial
Last updated: March 10, 2025 9:46 am
Editorial
Published January 11, 2019
Share

Rationale of the deal

The proposed Siemens-Alstom merger has raised antitrust flags because it would create a market leader that could control up to 60-80% of the EU market. Both companies compete across Europe in trains, maintenance, signaling and systems.

Contents
Rationale of the dealLess than 50% chances of approvalLarge divestitures likely needed to get approvalDecision likely in 1Q

Less than 50% chances of approval

The chance of getting an antitrust approval remain unclear despite the political pressure from Germany and France to get the deal approved. Precedents from Bayer-Monsanto or Dow-Dupont suggest that large divestitures may be required and approval may still be obtained even after a first negative feedback on a proposed remedy plan.

Large divestitures likely needed to get approval

Siemens and Alstom will likely need to offer additional divestitures to get the EU approval. Yet, this could limit their capacity to compete with China´s CRRC and achieve synergies, affecting the rationale of the deal. Divestitures are needed in rolling stock and signalling solutions. The companies have reportedly offered to sell Alstom’s Pendolino trains or Siemens’ Velaro models, as well as a five-year license for the new Velaro Novo line.

At this point, the parties are likely devising a new remedy proposal to change the regulator’s opinion on the deal. They may have approached potential buyers for the assets to be divested in Europe and elsewhere. Hitachi, Bombardier and CAF are some of the companies that have shown interest in acquiring some of the assets. Yet, the European Commission is likely to favour one single buyer for all assets as this may be the best way to create a strong competitor vis-a-vis the merged entity.

Decision likely in 1Q

The statutory deadline for a decision is February 18, set after the parties submitted remedies on December 12. Under EU law, when companies in a merger offer concessions, the timeline is normally extended by 15 working days. It is unlikely that this deadline will be pushed back again, even if the parties need to beef up the remedy proposal. The European Commission and the parties may work a new proposal within the timeframe established.

You Might Also Like

$33 Billion IBM-Red Hat M&A Shouldn’t Spark Antitrust Concerns

Apple’s Financial Services Plans May Clash with EU Rules

Potential Intel-Broadcom Deal: Strategic Implications and Market Impact

Mexican IFT Clears CFE’s Non-Controlling Acquisition with Conditions

Independent Publishers File EU Antitrust Complaint Over Google’s AI Overviews

TAGGED:alstomdivestituresEuropeM&Aoverlapsiemens

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Zalando’s EU Court Loss Harmless; Real Threats Are Weak Demand, Shein and Temu

Editorial
Editorial
September 4, 2025
Covestro’s 10% Drop: Merger Arbitrage Opportunity or Value Trap?
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?