Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Reading: Uber’ Labor Costs to Raise After U.K. Ruling
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
Investors

Uber’ Labor Costs to Raise After U.K. Ruling

Editorial
Last updated: March 10, 2025 9:46 am
Editorial
Published January 11, 2019
Share

On December 2018, Uber lost an appeal over driver employment rights. In a close vote (2-1), judges from the U.K. Court of Appeal endorsed a lower court’s ruling stating that drivers should be classed as workers with access to the minimum wage and paid holidays. Under U.K. employment law, there is a distinction between “workers” and “employees” where the latter enjoy more rights, like maternity leave. Thus, Uber may face now higher labour costs in the U.K. and this isn’t good news for a company whose biggest operational cost is precisely labour.

Uber may appeal the ruling to the U.K. Supreme Court, but it has slim chances to succeed as precedents aren’t favourable for the company. Lower tribunals in the U.K. have put more emphasis in the control that companies exercises on its employees or workers, rather than the language of the contracts, to determine the category of a employee. Both, EU and U.K. courts have previously considered Uber a transportation, not software company, subject to rules that these companies have to observe.

Interestingly, regulators and courts across Europe are pushing Uber to look and act as a transportation company, but this may play out well for the ride-hailing company. Despite the higher operational costs, these decisions help the company to navigate the turbulent regulatory waters that is facing. Rather than blanket prohibitions, courts in the U.K. or France are limiting, but not banning Uber services. In Spain, courts are helping Uber and Cabify to get more licenses. This could eventually allow Uber to become a monopoly as it is increasing bookings, driver and revenue much faster than any competitor. Besides, companies seeking entry or expansion in these markets will also have higher costs to bear.

Source: Bloomberg

Last, Uber’s court defeat may be good news for JustEat, its competitor in the food-delivery market. JustEat may just got an unexpected advantage over its rivals as the company isn’s as exposed to driver’s labor claims as Uber and Deliveroo. These two companies rely heavily on a fleet of delivery staff while JustEat let local restaurants to do the delivery. While UberEats and Deliveroo aren’t legally bound by this recent ruling, the similarities with Uber in their employment arrangements suggest they could likewise be subject to claims and also face higher labor costs.

You Might Also Like

EU Court Backs Antitrust Regulators’ Privacy Checks

Margrethe Vestager to Step Down as EU’s Competition Chief: A Decade of Big Tech Accountability

Epic Games Seeks $205 Million in Legal Fees From Google After Antitrust Trial Win

U.K. Bets on Synthetic Data For Open Finance

Alior Bank: An Underdog with a 9% Dividend Yield

TAGGED:antitrustlawsuituber

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Zalando’s EU Court Loss Harmless; Real Threats Are Weak Demand, Shein and Temu

Editorial
Editorial
September 4, 2025
Covestro’s 10% Drop: Merger Arbitrage Opportunity or Value Trap?
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?