Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • Antitrust Intelligence
  • Antitrust Club
  • Antitrust Investor
Reading: Spain’s CNMC Fines Booking.com €413 Million for Anticompetitive Practices
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • Antitrust Intelligence
  • Antitrust Club
  • Antitrust Investor
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Spain’s CNMC Fines Booking.com €413 Million for Anticompetitive Practices

Editorial
Last updated: March 10, 2025 9:45 am
Editorial
Published August 23, 2024
Share
Photo by Jakub Zerdzicki: https://www.pexels.com/photo/real-estate-agent-holding-new-home-keys-31015267/

The Spanish competition authority, Comisión Nacional de los Mercados y la Competencia (CNMC), has imposed a substantial fine of €413.24 million (approximately $447 million) on the online travel agency Booking.com.

Contents
Investigation and FindingsPenalties and Future ComplianceBooking.com’s Response and Future Implications

The fine, announced on Tuesday, stems from findings that the company abused its dominant market position over the past five years, particularly affecting hotels in Spain and competing online travel agencies (OTAs).

Investigation and Findings

The CNMC initiated an investigation in October 2022, prompted by complaints from the Spanish Association of Hotel Managers and the Regional Hotel Association of Madrid. The probe uncovered that Booking.com maintained a dominant market share, ranging from 70% to 90%, in the provision of online booking intermediation services to hotels in Spain. This dominance facilitated the imposition of unfair commercial terms on hotels and restricted competition from other OTAs.

Unfair Commercial Conditions

The investigation revealed that Booking.com enforced a pricing clause preventing hotels from offering lower rates on their own websites than those listed on Booking.com. Moreover, the platform retained the right to unilaterally lower room prices, which hotels had to honor. The CNMC also criticized the legal terms that forced disputes to be settled under Dutch law and in Amsterdam courts, placing an undue burden on Spanish entities seeking legal recourse.

Lack of Transparency and Exclusionary Practices

The CNMC highlighted the lack of transparency surrounding Booking.com’s subscription products, such as the Preferred, Preferred Plus, and Genius programs. These programs allow hotels to improve their visibility on the platform in exchange for higher commissions or discounted rates. The authority found that the performance metrics used to rank hotels in these programs were primarily based on profitability for Booking.com, thereby encouraging hotels to channel more bookings through the platform and limiting their engagement with competing OTAs.

The CNMC determined that these practices not only created an inequitable commercial relationship with Spanish hotels but also stifled competition by making it difficult for other OTAs to enter or expand within the market.

Penalties and Future Compliance

The CNMC has divided the fine into two penalties of €206.62 million each, corresponding to the two categories of abuse: imposing unfair terms and conditions, and restricting competition from other OTAs. Additionally, the authority has mandated Booking.com to cease the infringing practices and ensure no similar conduct occurs in the future.

Booking.com’s Response and Future Implications

Booking.com has announced its intention to appeal the decision. In a statement, company spokesperson Allison Voight expressed strong disagreement with the CNMC’s findings, arguing that the EU’s Digital Markets Act (DMA) should be the appropriate forum for addressing such issues uniformly across Europe. The company emphasized the competitive nature of the online travel sector and the variety of choices available to both consumers and accommodation partners.

“Booking.com operates in a highly competitive sector, and in an industry characterized by a high degree of choice for businesses and consumers alike.  We offer accommodation partners support programs such as our Preferred Plus and Genius that they can opt into. The decision today by the CNMC does not take this into account, adding to a lack of consistency for consumers and accommodation partners in Spain, against a global backdrop.“- spokesperson Allison Voight.

Beyond this case, Booking.com, designated as a gatekeeper under the EU’s DMA, faces tighter regulatory scrutiny across the European Union. Compliance with the new regime is required by mid-November, with potential penalties for non-compliance reaching up to 10% of global annual turnover, or 20% for repeat offenses.

The CNMC’s ruling highlights significant regulatory concerns around market dominance and fairness in digital marketplaces, setting a precedent for future enforcement actions both within Spain and across Europe.

You Might Also Like

Sweden Reviews Contractual Terms Between Food Platforms and Restaurants

IFF Reaches $26 Million Settlement in U.S. Fragrance Price-Fixing Class Action

Apple Prevails in Consumer Lawsuit Over iCloud Storage—For Now

Hungary Penalizes Paradox and Distributor in Security Market Case

ARGENTINA: La Nueva Competencia

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Insights
  • Financial Analysis
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?