Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What we do?
  • Insights
  • Financial Analysis
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
  • Antitrust Investor
Reading: Romanian Competition Council Fines Four Companies for Bid-Rigging in Road Maintenance Tenders
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What we do?
  • Insights
  • Financial Analysis
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
  • Antitrust Investor
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Romanian Competition Council Fines Four Companies for Bid-Rigging in Road Maintenance Tenders

Editorial
Last updated: October 21, 2025 4:34 pm
Editorial
Published October 21, 2025
Share
Photo by sq lim on Unsplash

The Romanian Competition Council (Consiliul Concurenței) has fined four companies a total of 2.32 million lei (around €466,000) for colluding in several public tenders organized by the National Company for Road Infrastructure Administration (CNAIR). The sanctioned firms are Tredeco Holding SRL, Trecon Logistic SRL, Data Capture SRL, and Geo Drumuri Banat SRL.

According to the investigation, the four companies coordinated their bids in seven public procurement procedures for road maintenance works on Romania’s national and motorway network. The tenders were organized by CNAIR’s regional offices in Brașov, Bucharest, Constanța, and Timișoara. The Competition Council found that the companies exchanged sensitive commercial information and agreed to divide the market among themselves, which effectively limited genuine competition.

The fines were distributed as follows: Tredeco Holding SRL (Arad) was fined 1.79 million lei (€360,000); Trecon Logistic SRL (Arad) received 187,718 lei (€38,000); Data Capture SRL (Arad) was fined 229,624 lei (€46,000); and Geo Drumuri Banat SRL (Caraș-Severin) received 110,515 lei (€22,000).

Romania’s competition law prohibits any agreements or coordinated practices between companies that restrict, prevent, or distort competition. This includes arrangements that fix prices, share markets, or manipulate bidding processes.

The Competition Council’s decision is legally binding, and the fines will be collected by the National Agency for Fiscal Administration (ANAF). The decision will be published on the Council’s website once confidential details are removed.

This case underscores the authority’s focus on maintaining fair competition in public procurement. Bid-rigging in infrastructure projects not only harms public budgets but also undermines efficiency and transparency in the use of public funds.

You Might Also Like

Czech Competition Office Investigates TV Station for Potencial Abuse of Dominance

Spain Fines Mémora for Breach of Merger Commitments

EU Regulator Probes Pierre Cardin for Anticompetitive Practices

Amazon Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Lawsuit Over Cloud Networking Practices

France Clears Vossloh’s Acquisition of Sateba, Subject to Commitment

TAGGED:bid-riggingData CaptureGeo Drumuri Banatroad maintenanceRomaniatendersTredeco

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
telefonica
Financial Analysis

Financial Headwinds Temper Telefónica’s Consolidation Agenda

Editorial
Editorial
November 6, 2025
The App Store Is Apple’s Profit Engine — and Its Most Guarded Secret
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Insights
  • Financial Analysis
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?