Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Sign in
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • For Lawyers
    For Lawyers
    Here, you’ll find the regulatory trends and hidden market shifts that others miss. You’ll learn where markets (and your clients’ industries) are heading—and how to…
    Show More
    Latest News
    Lloyds, Barclays, Santander’s £6 billion Risk Hinges on July UK Supreme Court Ruling
    July 10, 2025
    Zoetis Faces Higher Risks in UK Study than EU Antitrust Probe
    July 9, 2025
    OECD List with Most and Least Competitive Industries
    July 6, 2025
    CMA Set to Review Global Payments–Worldpay, A Deal Investors Don’t Cheer For
    July 3, 2025
  • For Investors
    For Investors
    Regulatory events move markets—often faster than earnings reports. A merger approval or a hefty fine can send a stock soaring or sinking in a day.…
    Show More
    Latest News
    Bank Pekao: On Its Way to lead Poland’s financial sector
    July 8, 2025
    Nexi: Solid Numbers With Regulatory Events as Catalysts
    July 2, 2025
    Ercros: A Risky Bet With a Good Margin is Coming to an End
    June 25, 2025
    Zalando: two upcoming regulatory events may have minor upside
    June 23, 2025
  • News
    News
    Stay informed with our global antitrust news compilation—bringing you the latest developments, regulatory updates, and key cases from around the world, all in one place
    Show More
    Latest News
    Italy Launches Investigation into Revolut for Alleged Unfair Commercial Practices
    July 10, 2025
    Türkiye Imposes Daily Fines on Google Over Continued Non-Compliance With Competition Order
    July 10, 2025
    Ferrero Nears $3 Billion Deal to Acquire WK Kellogg, Expanding U.S. Food Empire
    July 10, 2025
    Seven Housebuilders agreed to pay £100 Million to Settle Cartel Probe
    July 9, 2025
  • Why Join?
  • Memberships
Reading: Microsoft Needs UK Court Win to Close Activision’s Deal
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Why Join?
  • Memberships
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
Lawyers

Microsoft Needs UK Court Win to Close Activision’s Deal

Editorial
Last updated: March 10, 2025 9:45 am
Editorial
Published June 5, 2023
Share

Microsoft’s $75 billion Activision deal is facing significant hurdles in both the UK and the US. In these jurisdictions, the companies need to win in the courtrooms if they want to close the deal. The interpretation of the remedies pertaining to the distribution of cloud gaming services could change the fate of the deal.

Contents
Rationale of the DealChallengesScope of the remediesTiming

Rationale of the Deal

This acquisition will provide Microsoft with a valuable array of gaming content, including renowned titles such as Call of Duty, World of Warcraft, and Candy Crush. This assortment of content will facilitate Microsoft’s implementation of a cross-platform strategy, enabling players to enjoy gaming experiences across various devices. The video gaming industry, with an estimated value of $220 billion, is currently undergoing a significant transition from a console-centric approach dominated by Sony (PlayStation, accounting for 20-40% of market share by sales value), Microsoft (Xbox, accounting for 20-30% of market share by sales value), and Nintendo (Switch, accounting for 30-40% of market share by sales value). The industry is now embracing a cross-platform, cloud-based strategy wherein consumers have the ability to stream games on multiple devices, such as smart TVs, mobiles, tablets, and PCs.

Although the cloud gaming sector is still in its early stages, it is experiencing rapid growth, with expectations of reaching a market value of GBP 1 billion in the UK by 2026. As the market expands, new players like Nvidia, Amazon, and Boosteroid are actively seeking to solidify their positions in the industry.

Challenges

Despite receiving approvals from the European Union, China, Japan, and several other countries, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in the US and the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) in the UK have raised concerns and either blocked or sought to block the deal through legal means. While the concerns raised in the US primarily revolve around potential anticompetitive implications within the console market, an aspect that does not appear to trouble other regulatory bodies due to the robust competition exerted by Sony (PlayStation), the concerns in the UK are centered on the provision of cloud gaming services.

According to the UK regulator, post-merger, Microsoft would possess the capacity and incentive to restrict the access of other cloud gaming services to Activision’s games and exclusively distribute them through Microsoft’s own cloud services. This, according to the regulator, would inevitably lead to reduced competition.

Interestingly, the European Union also expressed concerns regarding the supply of cloud gaming services. However, the remedies proposed by Microsoft were satisfactory to assuage the regulators’ worries in the EU, in contrast to the UK, where the provided remedies were deemed inadequate in addressing these concerns.

Scope of the remedies

Microsoft proposed behavioral remedies (free licesing agreements) in both Europe and the UK. However, it is important to note that the scope of these remedies may differ between the two regions.

In Europe, Microsoft offered a comprehensive solution by providing a 10-year free license to consumers in the European Economic Area (EEA). This license would enable them to stream all current and future Activision Blizzard PC and console games via any cloud game streaming service of their choice. Additionally, Microsoft extended a corresponding free license to cloud game streaming service providers, allowing EEA-based gamers to stream Activision Blizzard’s games through their preferred platforms.

On the other hand, Microsoft’s offering in the UK involved a 10-year royalty-free license, but it was limited to certain cloud gaming providers rather than encompassing all providers as in the European Union. Microsoft forged agreements with specific providers such as Nvidia, Boosteroid, and Ubitus for the distribution of games across different cloud gaming services in the UK. For consumers, the license is perpetual; however, the games must be played on eligible streaming services. Moreover, when it comes to PC games, they need to be purchased from authorized game stores. The CMA concluded that these limitations, along with others, would still curtail the ability of cloud gaming services to effectively compete with Microsoft.

In summary, while Microsoft’s remedies in Europe covered a broad range of stakeholders and provided greater flexibility, the UK remedies were more restricted, leading the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) to determine that they would impede effective competition among cloud gaming services.

Timing

Microsoft challenged the CMA’s decision before the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) on May 26. The CAT will likely call for a case management conference in 3Q to shed light on the many procedural issues of the case, but it is unlikely to make any determinations on the substance of the case. Given the complexity of the case, and the volume of evidence the court will have to review, a final decision isn’t likely before the end of the year. In the US, the FTC challenged the merger in December 2022, and an evidentiary hearing is scheduled for Aug. 2, 2023 before an Administrative Law Judge at the FTC’s headquarters.

You Might Also Like

AMD’s $4.9Bn Bet on AI Won’t Face Regulatory Hurdles

FTC Orders Mastercard to Cease Blocking Competing Networks

Nvidia Challenges EU Antitrust Regulators Over AI Startup Acquisition Review

Zoetis Faces Higher Risks in UK Study than EU Antitrust Probe

German Antitrust Regulator Clears Unicredit’s 29.9% Bid for Commerzbank

TAGGED:cmaeuropean commissionftcgamingM&Amergerremedies

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?