Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Reading: Microsoft Faces EU, French Antitrust Probes Over Teams, Bing
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Microsoft Faces EU, French Antitrust Probes Over Teams, Bing

Editorial
Last updated: March 10, 2025 3:53 pm
Editorial
Published February 10, 2025
Share

Microsoft has proposed increasing the price gap between its Office suite bundled with Teams and the version without the collaboration app in an effort to avoid potential European Union (EU) antitrust fines, sources familiar with the matter revealed.

Contents
Background of the InvestigationProposed Adjustments and Industry ResponseAdditional Regulatory ChallengesOutlook and Potential Impact

This move follows ongoing scrutiny from the European Commission over Microsoft’s product bundling practices.

Background of the Investigation

The EU’s investigation stems from a 2020 complaint by Slack, a Salesforce-owned messaging platform, which alleged that Microsoft’s bundling of Teams with Office gave the U.S. tech giant an unfair competitive advantage. A similar complaint was filed in 2023 by German competitor alfaview. Teams, which was integrated into Office 365 in 2017 at no additional cost, eventually replaced Skype for Business and surged in popularity, especially during the pandemic.

The European Commission initiated an antitrust probe in mid-2023, focusing on whether Microsoft’s practices stifled competition by making it difficult for rival software providers to compete effectively. In response, Microsoft unbundled Teams from Office in August 2023, offering Office without Teams for €2 less than the bundled version. Additionally, a standalone Teams subscription was priced at €5 per month. However, regulators indicated that these measures might not be sufficient to address competition concerns.

Proposed Adjustments and Industry Response

Microsoft’s latest proposal, which includes a more substantial price difference between Office with and without Teams, aims to allow competitors to offer more attractive alternatives. The company has also pledged improved interoperability terms, making it easier for rival collaboration tools to integrate with Office products.

While Microsoft’s concessions could persuade regulators to drop the case without issuing a fine or formal charges, industry sources suggest that further adjustments may be required. The European Commission has sought feedback from businesses impacted by Microsoft’s bundling strategy before determining its next steps.

If Microsoft fails to sufficiently address regulatory concerns, the Commission could move forward with formal charges by autumn 2025. Under EU law, Microsoft faces potential fines of up to 10% of its global annual revenue, which could amount to billions of euros.

Additional Regulatory Challenges

Beyond the Office-Teams investigation, Microsoft is also under scrutiny from the French antitrust authority regarding the use of Bing search technology. Regulators are assessing whether Microsoft is limiting the quality of search results when smaller search engine providers pay to access Bing’s data. While Microsoft has stated its full cooperation with the investigation, the case could lead to formal charges and financial penalties.

Microsoft has a history of regulatory clashes in Europe, having accumulated €2.2 billion in EU antitrust fines over the past two decades for bundling practices related to its Windows operating system. The current investigation adds to the growing regulatory pressure on the tech giant as European authorities intensify their focus on competition enforcement in the digital sector.

Outlook and Potential Impact

If Microsoft’s latest proposal is accepted, it could free up resources within the European Commission to focus on ongoing antitrust cases against other major tech firms, including Apple and Google. However, should the Commission find Microsoft’s adjustments insufficient, the company could face prolonged legal battles and substantial financial penalties.

For now, Microsoft awaits the European Commission’s decision, which could shape the future of software competition in the EU. As regulators deliberate, rivals and consumers alike will be closely monitoring how these policy shifts impact market dynamics and pricing within the productivity software landscape.

You Might Also Like

U.S. Justice Department Sues Apple Over Alleged Antitrust Violations

White House Strikes Historic Deal for 10% Stake in Intel

UCI Faces EU Antitrust Complaint Over Sanctions on Rival Cycling Events

EU Fines Apple and Meta for DMA Breaches

Greece Probes Pet Food Market Over Competition Concerns

TAGGED:antitrust probeBingEUfrench antitrust authoritymicrosoftOfficeTeams

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Zalando’s EU Court Loss Harmless; Real Threats Are Weak Demand, Shein and Temu

Editorial
Editorial
September 4, 2025
Covestro’s 10% Drop: Merger Arbitrage Opportunity or Value Trap?
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?