Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Reading: Judge Rules Visa Must Face New Debit Card Antitrust Case
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Judge Rules Visa Must Face New Debit Card Antitrust Case

Editorial
Last updated: August 21, 2025 9:56 am
Editorial
Published August 21, 2025
Share
Photo by energepic.com: https://www.pexels.com/photo/black-payment-terminal-2988232/

Visa Inc. will have to continue defending itself in court against fresh antitrust claims over its role in the U.S. debit card market. A federal judge in Brooklyn, New York, ruled on August 20 that a 2019 settlement resolving earlier litigation over card swipe fees does not shield the company from new lawsuits brought by merchants, Bloomberg reported.

In her decision, U.S. District Judge Margo Brodie held that while there is some overlap between the two sets of cases, “the facts in the new group are materially different.” The earlier proceedings, which began in 2005 and also involved MasterCard, culminated in a $5.6 billion settlement. That agreement resolved many—but not all—claims related to credit and debit card fees. However, Brodie emphasized that the new suits, filed in October 2024, concern separate issues focused solely on Visa’s alleged monopolization of the debit card market.

The merchants’ claims are closely aligned with those advanced by the U.S. Department of Justice in a separate lawsuit filed the previous month in Manhattan federal court. According to the DOJ, Visa controls more than 60% of all U.S. debit transactions, generating in excess of $7 billion annually in processing fees. The government alleges that Visa illegally maintains this market dominance by discouraging competition. Tactics cited in the complaint include offering financial incentives to potential rivals to partner with Visa rather than compete, as well as imposing punitive fees designed to deter entry by other networks.

Visa had argued that certain merchants involved in the new cases should be barred from proceeding because they had already released claims under the 2019 settlement. Judge Brodie rejected that position, clearing the way for the lawsuits to move forward. A Visa spokesperson declined to comment on the ruling.

The decision means Visa now faces parallel litigation: one set of claims brought by federal authorities, and another by private plaintiffs. Both avenues could extend for years, potentially influencing the competitive conditions of the U.S. debit card market.

You Might Also Like

Honda and Nissan Abandon $60 Billion Merger Talks, Raising Uncertainty

FedEx, UPS, DHL Executives to Face Rare Cross-Examination in Indian Antitrust Case

Telefónica Fined €20 Million in Spain for Breaking Pay-TV Commitments

German Antitrust Watchdog Challenges Amazon’s Marketplace Price Controls

Amazon Responds to the FTC lawsuit

TAGGED:antitrustCardpayment servicesUSAvisa

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Covestro’s 10% Drop: Merger Arbitrage Opportunity or Value Trap?

Editorial
Editorial
September 9, 2025
Zalando’s EU Court Loss Harmless; Real Threats Are Weak Demand, Shein and Temu
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?