Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Sign in
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • For Lawyers
    For Lawyers
    Here, you’ll find the regulatory trends and hidden market shifts that others miss. You’ll learn where markets (and your clients’ industries) are heading—and how to…
    Show More
    Latest News
    Apple, Meta Refusal to Comply with EU rules May Bring New Fines, But Profits Too
    July 20, 2025
    Getty Images + Shutterstock: A Deal That Puts UK Regulator to the Test
    July 16, 2025
    Meta Bets Big on Smart Glasses, But Money is on Ads, Not Hardware
    July 15, 2025
    OpenAI–Google AI Browser War Exposes Limits of EU Tech Rules
    July 14, 2025
  • For Investors
    For Investors
    Regulatory events move markets—often faster than earnings reports. A merger approval or a hefty fine can send a stock soaring or sinking in a day.…
    Show More
    Latest News
    New EU rules targeting Shein and Temu Likely to Benefit Zalando
    July 18, 2025
    Symrise: How to benefit from a Cartel Investigation
    July 16, 2025
    Bank Pekao: On Its Way to lead Poland’s financial sector
    July 14, 2025
    Nexi: Solid Numbers With Regulatory Events as Catalysts
    July 14, 2025
  • News
    News
    Stay informed with our global antitrust news compilation—bringing you the latest developments, regulatory updates, and key cases from around the world, all in one place
    Show More
    Latest News
    EU Launches Legal Action Against Spain Over Bank Merger Rules
    July 21, 2025
    Zuckerberg, Meta Executives Settle $8 Billion Privacy Lawsuit
    July 18, 2025
    Turkish Authority Opens Antitrust Probe into Mastercard and Visa
    July 18, 2025
    Malaysia Fines Three Contractors for Bid Rigging
    July 17, 2025
  • Why Join?
  • Memberships
Reading: Judge Denies Musk’s Injunction Request Against OpenAI, Expedites Trial
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Why Join?
  • Memberships
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Judge Denies Musk’s Injunction Request Against OpenAI, Expedites Trial

Editorial
Last updated: March 10, 2025 9:45 am
Editorial
Published March 5, 2025
Share
Photo by Mariia Shalabaieva on Unsplash

In a significant development in the ongoing legal battle between Elon Musk and OpenAI, a U.S. judge has denied Musk’s request for a preliminary injunction to halt OpenAI’s transition to a for-profit model.

However, the court has agreed to fast-track the trial, setting it for the fall of this year, Reuters reported.

Judicial Ruling and Legal Implications

U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, presiding in Oakland, California, ruled that Musk did not meet the high legal burden required to justify an injunction against OpenAI’s corporate restructuring. Nevertheless, Rogers emphasized the importance of a swift resolution, citing “the public interest at stake and potential for harm if a conversion contrary to law occurred.“

Musk, who co-founded OpenAI as a nonprofit in 2015 but later parted ways with the organization, has accused the AI developer of deviating from its original mission of prioritizing humanity over corporate profit. The lawsuit centers on OpenAI’s transformation into a for-profit entity, a shift that Musk argues contradicts the startup’s foundational principles.

Responses from Key Stakeholders

OpenAI and its CEO, Sam Altman, have rejected Musk’s claims, maintaining that the transition to a for-profit model is essential for securing capital in the highly competitive and resource-intensive AI industry. OpenAI welcomed the judge’s ruling, asserting that Musk’s lawsuit is “always been about competition.” Microsoft, OpenAI’s primary investor, declined to comment on the decision.

Marc Toberoff, Musk’s attorney, expressed satisfaction with the court’s decision to accelerate the trial. “We look forward to a jury confirming that Altman accepted Musk’s charitable contributions knowing full well they had to be used for the public’s benefit rather than his own enrichment,” Toberoff stated.

Competitive and Financial Stakes

The ruling follows a recent high-profile incident in which Altman rejected a $97.4 billion unsolicited takeover bid from a Musk-led consortium with a curt “no thank you.” Altman has publicly accused Musk of attempting to hinder a competing AI company.

Meanwhile, OpenAI continues to attract major financial backing. Reuters recently reported that SoftBank Group is in discussions to lead a funding round of up to $40 billion, potentially valuing OpenAI at $300 billion. This valuation far exceeds the $75 billion that Musk’s AI startup, xAI, reportedly discussed in its recent fundraising efforts.

With the trial set to proceed on an expedited timeline, the legal battle between Musk and OpenAI will likely have far-reaching implications for the future of AI governance, corporate structure, and competitive dynamics in the rapidly evolving artificial intelligence sector.

You Might Also Like

Telefónica Continues Strategic Exit from Latin America with Sale of Ecuador Unit to Millicom for €330 Million

Trump’s Picks for SEC and DOJ Signal a Shift in Crypto and Tech Regulation

Federal Cartel Office Probes Vodafone Over 1&1 Network Delays

Norway’s Food Retailers Receive Substantial Reduction in Antitrust Fines

Mexico´s President Proposes New Antitrust Legislation

TAGGED:elon muskExpedites TrialmicrosoftOpenAIU.S. District Court

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Symrise: How to benefit from a Cartel Investigation

Editorial
Editorial
July 16, 2025
New EU rules targeting Shein and Temu Likely to Benefit Zalando
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?