Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Sign in
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Mergers
    Mergers
    Identify regulatory challenges and understand how they impact deal closing to gain the insights needed to make informed decisions.
    Show More
    Latest News
    Portugal Opens In-Depth Investigation into Idealista’s Acquisition of Portal47
    June 3, 2025
    Aura Minerals Acquires Serra Grande Gold Mine in Brazil
    June 2, 2025
    SalMar’s Wilsgård Merger Strengthens Core Operations, Yet Legal Risks Could Weigh on Stock
    June 2, 2025
    Brazil Recommends Structural Remedies for Bimbo’s Acquisition of Wickbold
    May 28, 2025
  • Market Intelligence
    Market Intelligence
    Explore the risks and opportunities arising from regulatory decisions to understand their impact on companies and markets, ensuring your company and clients benefit.
    Show More
    Latest News
    Tariffs, Lawsuits, and a Cash Crunch: Stellantis’ Risk Pile-Up
    June 3, 2025
    How Investor Filings Can Strengthen Your Legal and Strategic Arguments
    May 29, 2025
    Pets at Home Rallies on Vet Growth—But CMA Risk Lurks Larger Than for CVS
    May 28, 2025
    Grieg Seafood Slides 4% Amid Weak Q1 and Rising Legal Risks
    June 2, 2025
  • News
    News
    Stay informed with our global antitrust news compilation—bringing you the latest developments, regulatory updates, and key cases from around the world, all in one place
    Show More
    Latest News
    Chile Seeks $74M Fine Against Pedidos Ya and Glovo Over Market-Sharing Deal
    June 3, 2025
    EU Slaps €329M Fine on Delivery Hero and the Stock Price Rises. Why?
    June 2, 2025
    German Antitrust Watchdog Challenges Amazon’s Marketplace Price Controls
    June 2, 2025
    UK Begins BNPL Regulation Process, with New Rules Expected in 2026
    May 29, 2025
  • Memberships
Reading: Intel Secures $536 Million from EU in 15-Year Antitrust Battle
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • Home
  • Mergers
  • Market Intelligence
  • News
  • Memberships
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Intel Secures $536 Million from EU in 15-Year Antitrust Battle

Editorial
Last updated: March 10, 2025 9:45 am
Editorial
Published February 6, 2025
Share

U.S. chipmaker Intel has received €515.55 million ($536 million) in default interest from the European Union (EU) following a prolonged legal battle over a €1.06 billion antitrust fine imposed in 2009, Reuters reported.

Contents
Legal Victory and Financial ReimbursementOngoing Claims and Legal PrecedentRegulatory Scrutiny and Market ImplicationsFuture Outlook

This development follows Intel’s successful appeal, which led to the fine being overturned in court.

Legal Victory and Financial Reimbursement

In 2022, Intel sued the European Commission for €593 million in default interest after convincing the General Court of the European Union to annul the original penalty. The Commission returned $1.2 billion to Intel in January 2024 but initially refused to reimburse the default interest. After continued legal efforts, Intel received its due interest compensation on November 6, 2024.

Ongoing Claims and Legal Precedent

Despite this partial reimbursement, Intel is pursuing an additional €593 million ($624 million) in interest payments. The company argues that the interest should be calculated based on the European Central Bank’s refinancing rate, initially set at 1.25% in May 2009 and later adjusted to 3.5% until February 2024. Intel’s case aligns with a precedent established by Europe’s top court, which mandates that late payment of interest will itself accrue additional interest.

Regulatory Scrutiny and Market Implications

The European Commission had originally penalized Intel for allegedly paying major PC manufacturers—HP, Acer, and Lenovo—to delay or halt rival chip products. While the bulk of the Commission’s findings were dismissed, a portion of Intel’s conduct led to a separate €376 million fine in 2023. This case underscores a growing trend of companies seeking legal recourse against regulatory fines, pushing the EU to ensure prompt reimbursement and fair interest calculations.

Future Outlook

As Intel continues to pursue additional compensation, this case sets a significant precedent for corporations challenging EU antitrust rulings. The outcome may influence future regulatory enforcement and the financial responsibilities of the European Commission when fines are overturned.

You Might Also Like

EU Defends Digital Markets Act, Denies Targeting U.S. Tech Giants

Sen. Warren Proposed Merger Bill Is Unlikely to be Approved

UK Payment Systems Regulator Finds Market Inefficiencies in Card Processing Fees

Lufthansa’s airBaltic Stake Doesn’t Require Latvian Competition Review

Germany Fines Seven Companies €10.5 Million for Road Repair Cartel

TAGGED:appealbig techEUeuropean commissionintel
Popular News

Weekly Newsletter

Impress your colleagues, boss or clients with our weekly unique insights
News

TSMC Proposes Joint Venture to Operate Intel’s Foundry Business

Editorial
Editorial
March 12, 2025
Global Antitrust Regulators Meet in Berlin
EU Slaps €329M Fine on Delivery Hero and the Stock Price Rises. Why?
European Commission Reconsiders Investigations Into Tech Giants
Brazil Recommends Limits on TIM-Vivo Network Sharing Deal
Antitrust Intelligence

About US

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Mergers
  • Market Intelligence
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About US
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe US

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?