Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Sign in
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Mergers
    Mergers
    Identify regulatory challenges and understand how they impact deal closing to gain the insights needed to make informed decisions.
    Show More
    Latest News
    Brazil Recommends Structural Remedies for Bimbo’s Acquisition of Wickbold
    May 28, 2025
    UniCredit–Banco BPM: Remedies Submitted in Brussels, Lawsuit Expected in Italy
    May 27, 2025
    Gold Mining Consolidation Unlikely to Face Regulatory Pushback
    May 27, 2025
    Petz and Cobasi Merger Set to Reshape Brazil’s Pet Retail Market
    May 20, 2025
  • Market Intelligence
    Market Intelligence
    Explore the risks and opportunities arising from regulatory decisions to understand their impact on companies and markets, ensuring your company and clients benefit.
    Show More
    Latest News
    How Investor Filings Can Strengthen Your Legal and Strategic Arguments
    May 29, 2025
    Pets at Home Rallies on Vet Growth—But CMA Risk Lurks Larger Than for CVS
    May 28, 2025
    Grieg Seafood Slides 4% Amid Weak Q1 and Rising Legal Risks
    May 27, 2025
    Bumpy Road To Claim Damages May Shield Carmakers in Second UK Cartel Risk (Part 2)
    May 26, 2025
  • News
    News
    Stay informed with our global antitrust news compilation—bringing you the latest developments, regulatory updates, and key cases from around the world, all in one place
    Show More
    Latest News
    UK Begins BNPL Regulation Process, with New Rules Expected in 2026
    May 29, 2025
    Korea’s Competition Watchdog Launches Market Survey On the Data Sector
    May 29, 2025
    Chilean Supreme Court Upholds Record Fine Against CDF
    May 28, 2025
    The Future of BBVA’s Takeover of Sabadell Rests with the Spanish Government
    May 28, 2025
  • Memberships
Reading: Google Accuses India’s Antitrust Watchdog of Favoring Amazon
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • Home
  • Mergers
  • Market Intelligence
  • News
  • Memberships
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Google Accuses India’s Antitrust Watchdog of Favoring Amazon

Editorial
Last updated: March 10, 2025 9:45 am
Editorial
Published July 10, 2023
Share

Google has lodged a complaint against India’s antitrust regulatory body, accusing it of ordering changes to Google’s business model to protect its rival, Amazon. 

Photo by Daniel Romero on Unsplash

Legal papers reveal that Amazon claimed Google’s restrictions hindered the development of its customized Android system, Fire OS. Google has sought to reverse the Competition Commission of India’s (CCI) October 2022 order, which demanded multiple changes to Google’s business practices. The order aimed to address monopolistic practices and resulted in a fine of $163 million imposed on Google by the CCI.

Google’s Allegations and Response

Google contends that the CCI’s investigation unit relied on European evidence that was not examined in India, claiming that certain sections were “copypasted” from a European ruling against the company. Google argues that the CCI unfairly based its adverse decision on Amazon’s accusation, asserting that Amazon’s Fire OS failed commercially due to poor user experience and was not even launched in India. Google believes that the CCI’s directives were intended solely to protect Amazon, which had complained about the limitations imposed by Google’s restrictions on developing its Android fork.

The CCI’s Order and Google’s Actions

The CCI’s October order required Google to allow the distribution of modified versions of its Android operating system without licensing restrictions, including pre-installation of Google apps. Google has approached India’s Supreme Court to challenge the CCI’s order and seeks to nullify the 10 mandated changes to its business model. The company argues that it did not abuse its market position and that the CCI’s investigation lacked fairness and relied on flawed evidence.

Implications and Disagreements

Google’s dispute with the CCI underscores its disagreement with the manner in which the Android investigation was conducted. The CCI’s directives were seen as more extensive than the European Commission’s landmark ruling in 2018 against Google’s Android market abuse. This ongoing legal battle raises concerns for Google, particularly in India, as it faces penalties and demands to comply with the CCI’s directives.

Google’s Business Model Adjustments and Future Prospects

Following the CCI’s order, Google has made significant changes to its Android business model in India. However, it continues to contest the penalty and the finding that it abused its market position. The CCI is urging Google to comply with all its directives, while Google maintains its stance in the Supreme Court.

You Might Also Like

Alphabet in Advanced Talks to Acquire Wiz for Over $30 Billion

Federal Judge Allows FTC’s Antitrust Lawsuit Against Amazon to Proceed, Dismisses Some State Claims

French Antitrust Authority Approves Carrefour’s Acquisition of Delhaize’s French Business with Conditions

Sutter Health Reaches Settlement in Long-Running Antitrust Case

Argentina Suspends Telecom Merger Over Market Concerns

TAGGED:amazonandroidbig techCCIgoogleIndia
Popular News

Weekly Newsletter

Impress your colleagues, boss or clients with our weekly unique insights
News

ICE’s Target Black Knight Sells Unit to Ease Antitrust Concerns

Editorial
Editorial
July 17, 2023
Romania Opens Public Consultation on Vodafone-Digi’s Proposed Remedies
EU Parliament Endorsed New Rules To Keep Foreign Buyers At Bay
Antitrust Scrutiny on India’s Quick Commerce Giants: A Deepening Controversy
Prosus’ €4.1B Just Eat Takeaway Acquisition: Consolidation or Diversification?
Antitrust Intelligence

About US

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Mergers
  • Market Intelligence
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About US
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe US

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?