Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Sign in
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Mergers
    Mergers
    Identify regulatory challenges and understand how they impact deal closing to gain the insights needed to make informed decisions.
    Show More
    Latest News
    Portugal Opens In-Depth Investigation into Idealista’s Acquisition of Portal47
    June 3, 2025
    Aura Minerals Acquires Serra Grande Gold Mine in Brazil
    June 2, 2025
    SalMar’s Wilsgård Merger Strengthens Core Operations, Yet Legal Risks Could Weigh on Stock
    June 2, 2025
    Brazil Recommends Structural Remedies for Bimbo’s Acquisition of Wickbold
    May 28, 2025
  • Market Intelligence
    Market Intelligence
    Explore the risks and opportunities arising from regulatory decisions to understand their impact on companies and markets, ensuring your company and clients benefit.
    Show More
    Latest News
    Tariffs, Lawsuits, and a Cash Crunch: Stellantis’ Risk Pile-Up
    June 3, 2025
    How Investor Filings Can Strengthen Your Legal and Strategic Arguments
    May 29, 2025
    Pets at Home Rallies on Vet Growth—But CMA Risk Lurks Larger Than for CVS
    May 28, 2025
    Grieg Seafood Slides 4% Amid Weak Q1 and Rising Legal Risks
    June 2, 2025
  • News
    News
    Stay informed with our global antitrust news compilation—bringing you the latest developments, regulatory updates, and key cases from around the world, all in one place
    Show More
    Latest News
    Chile Seeks $74M Fine Against Pedidos Ya and Glovo Over Market-Sharing Deal
    June 3, 2025
    EU Slaps €329M Fine on Delivery Hero and the Stock Price Rises. Why?
    June 3, 2025
    German Antitrust Watchdog Challenges Amazon’s Marketplace Price Controls
    June 2, 2025
    UK Begins BNPL Regulation Process, with New Rules Expected in 2026
    May 29, 2025
  • Memberships
Reading: Germany Deals a Blow to Apple: Stricter Oversight Ahead
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • Home
  • Mergers
  • Market Intelligence
  • News
  • Memberships
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Germany Deals a Blow to Apple: Stricter Oversight Ahead

Editorial
Last updated: March 18, 2025 1:34 pm
Editorial
Published March 18, 2025
Share
Photo by Armand Valendez: https://www.pexels.com/photo/apple-logo-544295/

Germany’s competition authority, the Bundeskartellamt, has secured a significant legal victory in its efforts to regulate the dominance of large digital companies.

Contents
Strengthened Regulatory Oversight Under Section 19a GWBTwo-Stage Examination ProcessApple’s Regulatory ChallengesImplications and Ongoing Proceedings

On Tuesday, the Federal Court of Justice upheld the Bundeskartellamt’s 2023 designation of Apple as a “company of paramount cross-market significance for competition.” This ruling subjects Apple to stricter oversight under Germany’s expanded abuse control framework, aligning it with other tech giants such as Alphabet/Google and Meta.

Strengthened Regulatory Oversight Under Section 19a GWB

With the enactment of the 10th amendment to the German Competition Act (GWB) in 2021, the Bundeskartellamt gained a powerful tool—Section 19a GWB—to prevent and mitigate anti-competitive practices by dominant digital firms. This provision enables the authority to take proactive measures against companies that hold significant market power across multiple sectors.

Two-Stage Examination Process

  1. Assessment of Market Significance: The Bundeskartellamt first determines whether a company holds a position of paramount significance for competition across markets. This designation has been confirmed for Meta, Alphabet, Amazon, and Apple, with the Federal Court of Justice upholding the decisions against Amazon and Apple in March 2025.
  2. Prohibition of Anti-Competitive Practices: Once designated under Section 19a GWB, the authority can prohibit practices such as self-preferencing and market penetration through unfair competitive means.

Apple’s Regulatory Challenges

Apple’s ecosystem, built around its iOS operating system and App Store, grants the company substantial control over digital markets. The Bundeskartellamt’s 2023 assessment confirmed that Apple’s dominance extends beyond individual product categories, influencing competition on a broader scale. Apple challenged this ruling in court, but the Federal Court of Justice’s March 2025 decision upheld the regulator’s findings, cementing Apple’s status under Section 19a GWB.

One of the key investigations against Apple focuses on its App Tracking Transparency Framework (ATTF). Since April 2021, Apple has required third-party app developers to obtain additional user consent before accessing certain data for advertising purposes. However, Apple’s own services are not subject to the same strict rules, raising concerns about potential self-preferencing.

In June 2022, the Bundeskartellamt launched an investigation into whether Apple’s tracking regulations unfairly disadvantage third-party developers. In February 2025, the authority issued its preliminary legal assessment, suggesting that ATTF may violate both Section 19a(2) GWB and Article 102 TFEU, which prohibits abuse of market dominance in the EU.

Implications and Ongoing Proceedings

The Federal Court of Justice’s ruling strengthens the Bundeskartellamt’s authority to impose stricter measures against Apple and other major tech firms. The regulator’s president, Andreas Mundt, welcomed the decision, stating:

“This means that the highest court has confirmed that Apple is subject to stricter abuse control. Our ongoing review of Apple’s tracking regulation for third-party apps is therefore on a solid footing, and we are working flat out on this case and other cases against the major internet companies.”

In addition to Apple, the Bundeskartellamt continues its proceedings against Alphabet/Google, Meta, and Amazon, addressing concerns over data processing, self-preferencing, and other competition-restricting behaviors. Significant improvements have already been achieved in areas such as Google News Showcase and Meta’s VR headset practices.

You Might Also Like

BT Explores International Partnerships with AT&T and Orange

ARGENTINA: La Nueva Competencia

Italiy Investigates Morellato Over Alleged Online Sales Restrictions

Meta Faces Tougher Antitrust Oversight in Germany

Playtech Secures Mexican Antitrust Approval for Caliplay Deal

TAGGED:abuse controlantitrustappleBundeskartellamtgermanyinvestigationtracking regulation
Popular News

Weekly Newsletter

Impress your colleagues, boss or clients with our weekly unique insights
Market Intelligence

What if Google wins the Android Case in Court?

Editorial
Editorial
January 13, 2019
Korea’s Competition Watchdog Launches Market Survey On the Data Sector
Broadcom’s $61 Billion VMware Bid May Get EU approval, Sources
The Weaponization of Trade (Episode 2): Steel, Aluminum, and Timber
FTC Sues Amazon For Deceptive Practices With Prime Subscribers
Antitrust Intelligence

About US

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Mergers
  • Market Intelligence
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About US
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe US

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?