Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Reading: German Antitrust Watchdog Challenges Amazon’s Marketplace Price Controls
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
amazon marketplace
News

German Antitrust Watchdog Challenges Amazon’s Marketplace Price Controls

Editorial
Last updated: June 2, 2025 11:44 am
Editorial
Published June 2, 2025
Share
Photo by Sagar Soneji: https://www.pexels.com/photo/close-up-of-smartphone-screen-with-icons-4560039/

The German Federal Cartel Office (Bundeskartellamt) has issued a formal statement of objections to Amazon, raising serious concerns over the tech giant’s use of algorithm-driven price control mechanisms that allegedly suppress competition on its marketplace platform.

In its preliminary legal assessment, the authority concluded that Amazon’s pricing policies — which prevent third-party sellers on the Amazon.de Marketplace from exceeding certain price thresholds — may violate both German and EU competition laws. The conduct could constitute an abuse of market power under Section 19a(2) and Section 19 of the German Competition Act (GWB) and Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), which prohibit the abuse of a dominant market position.

The concerns stem from Amazon’s enforcement of so-called “Fair Pricing” policies, which use internal algorithms and statistical models to set dynamic price caps. These caps are calculated based on internal and external price comparisons and are used to determine whether a seller’s product remains visible on the platform. Sellers who breach Amazon’s pricing thresholds risk their products being removed entirely, excluded from the prominently placed “Buy Box,” or hidden from search results and advertising.

“Competition in online retail in Germany is largely determined by Amazon’s rules,” said Andreas Mundt, President of the Federal Cartel Office. “Given that Amazon competes directly with sellers on its platform, any influence it exerts on their pricing — even indirectly — raises serious antitrust concerns.”

Amazon, which commands around 60% of the German online retail market, operates both as a direct retailer (Amazon Retail) and as a host of third-party sellers (Marketplace). This dual role has led to intensified regulatory scrutiny over potential conflicts of interest and platform neutrality.

One of the main issues highlighted by the watchdog is the lack of transparency and objectivity in Amazon’s price-setting mechanisms. According to Mundt, the parameters that determine acceptable price ranges are controlled solely by Amazon and are not disclosed to sellers, leaving them with limited ability to challenge or understand the criteria behind price-related penalties.

The Cartel Office noted several competition concerns in its initial findings:

  • Lack of Transparency: Price restrictions are based on opaque mechanisms, making it difficult for sellers to understand or anticipate enforcement actions.
  • Market Exit Risk: Price caps that prevent sellers from covering their costs may lead to exit from the platform, reducing consumer choice.
  • Coordinated Pricing Risks: Amazon’s system could inadvertently align third-party sellers’ prices with Amazon’s own pricing strategies, potentially creating a de facto uniform pricing model across the platform.
  • Barrier to Price Competition: By systematically tracking and enforcing the lowest external prices, Amazon’s pricing tools could deter other retailers from undercutting prices, limiting downward price movement in the broader online retail sector.

Amazon now has the opportunity to respond to the allegations. The findings follow an extensive investigation by the authority, including a large-scale survey of marketplace sellers conducted in 2024.

This latest move builds on a 2022 decision in which the Federal Cartel Office designated Amazon as a company of “paramount cross-market significance,” placing it under special antitrust scrutiny pursuant to Section 19a of the GWB. That designation was upheld by Germany’s Federal Court of Justice in April 2024.

The investigation is being closely coordinated with the European Commission, which enforces the Digital Markets Act, and Germany’s Federal Network Agency, responsible for implementing the EU’s Platform-to-Business Regulation.

Amazon has not yet issued a public response.

You Might Also Like

Meta Faces Potential Daily Fines as EU Scrutinizes Pay-or-Consent Model

Apple and Meta Likely to Face Modest Fines Over DMA Breaches

Brazil Fines Companies for Gun Jumping Violations

Azul-Gol Merger: Transforming Brazil’s Skies

French Antitrust Authority Approves Carrefour’s Acquisition of Delhaize’s French Business with Conditions

TAGGED:amazonBundeskartellamtEUgermanyMarketplaceprice controls

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Zalando’s EU Court Loss Harmless; Real Threats Are Weak Demand, Shein and Temu

Editorial
Editorial
September 4, 2025
Covestro’s 10% Drop: Merger Arbitrage Opportunity or Value Trap?
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?