Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Reading: Frito-Lay Fined $36M for Antitrust Violations in Türkiye
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Frito-Lay Fined $36M for Antitrust Violations in Türkiye

Editorial
Last updated: March 10, 2025 9:45 am
Editorial
Published February 16, 2025
Share

The Turkish Competition Authority has imposed a significant antitrust penalty of 1.3 billion liras ($36 million) on Frito-Lay, a subsidiary of PepsiCo Inc., following an extensive investigation into the company’s competitive practices.

Contents
Findings of the InvestigationBroader Implications and Historical PrecedentsIndustry Impact and Future Outlook

The ruling, announced on Saturday, is aimed at fostering a more competitive market for packaged snack foods in Türkiye, was reported by Bloomberg.

Frito-Lay, a dominant force in Türkiye’s snack industry with brands such as Lays, Ruffles, Doritos, Cheetos, and Çerezza, was found to have engaged in practices that allegedly obstructed the sales of rival brands. The Turkish Competition Authority initiated its investigation in response to concerns that Frito-Lay and its distributors may have limited competitors’ access to sales outlets, particularly small grocery stores and kiosks.

Findings of the Investigation

The probe, which was launched following a preliminary inquiry in February, revealed that Frito-Lay engaged in several anti-competitive activities, including:

  • Restricting competitors’ sales to outlets purchasing Frito-Lay products.
  • Reducing the visibility of rival products in retail stores.
  • Removing competing brands from store shelves.
  • Establishing verbal exclusivity agreements with retailers to limit the availability of rival products.

As part of the penalty, Frito-Lay will also be required to allocate a section of its display stands to rival brands in smaller stores where these competitors lack their own display presence. This measure aims to increase consumer choice and level the playing field for smaller snack companies in Türkiye.

Broader Implications and Historical Precedents

This is not the first instance of regulatory action against Frito-Lay in Türkiye. The company was previously fined nearly 88 million TL (Turkish Lira) in late 2022 for involvement in a cartel-forming scheme. Additionally, in 2013, Frito-Lay faced an 18 million TL fine for violating competition regulations.

The latest penalty is part of a broader enforcement initiative by the Turkish Competition Authority, which levied a total of 7.7 billion liras in administrative fines on corporations in 2024, according to reports by the Anadolu Agency.

The regulator hopes that its measures will promote greater competition in the snack food industry by making it easier for smaller brands to enter and compete in retail spaces. This move aligns with the authority’s ongoing commitment to ensuring fair market practices and preventing monopolistic behavior in the Turkish economy.

Industry Impact and Future Outlook

The decision is expected to have a considerable impact on the Turkish snack industry, particularly in how multinational corporations conduct business in the country. Moving forward, Frito-Lay and other major players in the market will likely have to reassess their distribution and sales strategies to ensure compliance with Turkish competition laws.

The Turkish Competition Authority’s firm stance on anti-competitive behavior serves as a warning to other corporations operating in Turkey, reinforcing the country’s commitment to a fair and open marketplace.

You Might Also Like

Banco Master in Talks to Sell Assets to BTG Pactual

EU Court Confirms Credit Suisse’s Role in FOREX Cartel but Slashes Fine by Over €50 Million

UCI Faces EU Antitrust Complaint Over Sanctions on Rival Cycling Events

Google Accuses India’s Antitrust Watchdog of Favoring Amazon

Musk’s xAI Sues Apple, OpenAI Over AI Competition

TAGGED:antitrustFrito-LayPepsiCo.Turkish Competition Authority

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Zalando’s EU Court Loss Harmless; Real Threats Are Weak Demand, Shein and Temu

Editorial
Editorial
September 4, 2025
Covestro’s 10% Drop: Merger Arbitrage Opportunity or Value Trap?
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?