Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • Antitrust Intelligence
  • Antitrust Club
  • Antitrust Investor
Reading: EU Finds TikTok and Meta in Preliminary Breach of DSA Transparency Rules
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • Antitrust Intelligence
  • Antitrust Club
  • Antitrust Investor
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

EU Finds TikTok and Meta in Preliminary Breach of DSA Transparency Rules

Editorial
Last updated: October 24, 2025 3:46 pm
Editorial
Published October 24, 2025
Share
Photo by cottonbro studio: https://www.pexels.com/photo/person-using-a-smartphone-5081926/

The European Commission has issued preliminary findings that TikTok and Meta have breached their transparency and user protection obligations under the Digital Services Act (DSA). The Commission’s initial assessment indicates that both platforms failed to provide adequate access to public data for researchers, while Meta – for both Facebook and Instagram – may also have violated its duties related to user notification of illegal content and content moderation appeals.

According to the Commission, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok appear to have imposed excessively complex and restrictive procedures for researchers seeking access to public data. These obstacles have reportedly resulted in partial or unreliable datasets, hindering independent research into issues such as user exposure – particularly of minors – to harmful or illegal content. Ensuring access to platform data is a key transparency requirement under the DSA, enabling greater public scrutiny of the societal impacts of large online platforms.

The Commission also raised concerns about Meta’s “Notice and Action” mechanisms, which are intended to allow users to flag illegal content. The current systems on Facebook and Instagram, the Commission found, do not appear to be user-friendly or easily accessible and may include unnecessary steps that deter users from reporting harmful material. In addition, the Commission noted the use of “dark patterns” – deceptive interface designs — which can mislead or discourage users, thereby undermining the effectiveness of the reporting process.

Under the DSA, online platforms are obliged to act expeditiously upon being notified of illegal content and to ensure users can easily submit such notices. Failure to do so can remove the liability exemption that platforms otherwise enjoy for third-party content.

The investigation further highlighted shortcomings in Meta’s content moderation appeal mechanisms. The Commission found that users challenging the removal of their content or account suspensions on Facebook and Instagram are not currently given sufficient opportunity to submit explanations or supporting evidence. This limitation, it said, weakens users’ right to an effective remedy under EU law.

The Commission’s findings are preliminary and do not prejudge the outcome of the ongoing investigations. TikTok and Meta now have the opportunity to review the case files and respond in writing to the Commission’s concerns. They may also take corrective measures to address the alleged breaches. The European Board for Digital Services will be consulted as part of the process.

If confirmed, the Commission may issue a non-compliance decision, exposing the companies to fines of up to 6% of their total worldwide annual turnover and potential periodic penalty payments to ensure compliance.

The Commission also announced that new rules on researcher access to non-public data from very large online platforms and search engines will take effect on 29 October 2025. These measures are designed to enhance transparency, accountability, and the identification of systemic risks arising from online platforms’ activities.

Commenting on the findings, Henna Virkkunen, Executive Vice-President for Tech Sovereignty, Security and Democracy, stated:

“Our democracies depend on trust. That means platforms must empower users, respect their rights, and open their systems to scrutiny. The DSA makes this a duty, not a choice. With today’s actions, we have now issued preliminary findings on researchers’ access to data to four platforms. We are making sure platforms are accountable for their services, as ensured by EU law, towards users and society.”

The preliminary findings form part of ongoing formal proceedings against Meta and TikTok under the DSA. These are separate from other ongoing EU investigations into the companies’ compliance with different areas of EU law.

You Might Also Like

$10.55 Billion Sale: Boeing to Divest Jeppesen and Digital Assets to Thoma Bravo

Boeing Seeks EU Nod for Spirit Deal with Remedies

Leipzig Court Orders Meta to Pay €5,000 in Facebook Data Privacy Case

UK Regulator Flags Monopoly in Spreadex-Sporting Index Deal

Mexico Replaces Antitrust Regulator: What you need to know

TAGGED:breachDSAEUmetaTikToktransparency

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Insights
  • Financial Analysis
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?