Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Reading: EU M&A Banking: at the Table or on the Menu
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
Investors

EU M&A Banking: at the Table or on the Menu

Editorial
Last updated: March 10, 2025 9:46 am
Editorial
Published September 24, 2020
Share

European lenders are scouting for investment opportunities after Intesa-UBI and Caixa-Bankia kicked off a consolidation race in pursuit of healthier balance sheets and better margins. Possible deals could include Unicredit-Monte Paschi and Deutsche Bank with either Commerzbank, BNP Paribas or UBS.

Intesa San Paolo’s acquisition of UBI Banca in 2Q20, followed by the Caixa-Bankia proposed merger in 3Q20 and possibly Unicredit’s acquisition of the Italian government’s majority stake in Monte Paschi have shaken the market. These deals had something in common, a big national lender acquiring a medium one with an important amount of “badwill” involved and the need to reduce costs. These domestic deals may be more palatable for national regulators and politicians but they may carry on higher antitrust risks, especially in retail and corporate banking where normally the parties have significant overlaps in some regions. This was the case of Intesa and UBI where the combined market share reached 60% in deposits and loans in some regions in the north of Italy. Yet, the political will, and considerable divestitures, appeased regulators and the approval was granted in just two months.

Source: Intesa San Paolo

Caixa-Bankia, likely to be reviewed by Spanish regulators and Unicredit-Monte Paschi, to be reviewed by EU regulators, could follow a similar fate. The Spanish lenders face fierce competition from Santander and BBVA as well as from medium and small banks. The Italian banks, despite facing a more concentrated market after the Intesa-UBI deal, will likely obtain the antitrust approval. Combined market shares are expected to be lower than its rivals both at regional and national levels. Additionally, Monte Paschi’s market shares are too low to give Unicredit any leverage to engage in anticompetitive bundling or tying with other products or services.

While other domestic deals may be on the table, including Commerzbank, BNP Paribas, Banco BPM or Unicaja, global lenders such as UBS, Credit Suisse and Deutsche Bank have already shown interest in being part of this consolidation wave. However, these lenders are more interested in cross border mergers, not only because antitrust risks will be lower but also to expand its footprint in Europe and compete better with U.S. rivals.

UBS may be considering a full merger with Credit Suisse (CS). A deal of this size, companies’s assets account for more than Switzerland’s GDP, would likely face some regulatory pushback in their home country given the domestic overlaps in retail and corporate banking. However, UBS’s interest on this deal is driven by CS’s investment banking and wealth management, areas that are more likely to be defined EU-wide and may not be subject to antitrust scrutiny. While a full merger may face antitrust issues, even if the lenders are poised to offer divestitures, the companies may explore other forms of collaboration in the most profitable areas such as investment banking and wealth management.

Deutsche bank is the latest bank to announce its intention to scout for opportunities. After a failed attempt in 2019 to merger with Commerzbank, the bank is now looking at cross border, rather than domestic, targets. This may include BNP Paribas and UBS, though the bank, according to the media, hasn’t engaged yet with any of these two competitors. Other targets in Spain and Italy can’t be ruled out as Deutsche Bank’s strategy for commercial banking outside Germany is focused in these two countries plus Belgium. Any of these possible combinations shouldn’t face a difficult merger review given Deutsche Bank’s limited presence in retail banking in those countries and possible overlaps in asset management, wealth or investment banking won’t be large enough to raise concerns.

Source: Intesa San Paolo

You Might Also Like

Facebook May Fare Better than Google, Apple After EU Antitrust Report

Telekom Slovenije Braces for Impact After Damage Claim Suit

How Corning Turned a $1.4B Antitrust Fine Risk Into a $5B Win in 9 Days

Pets at Home Rallies on Vet Growth—But CMA Risk Lurks Larger Than for CVS

Spirit-JetBlue Talks Fell Apart On Antitrust Risks

TAGGED:bankiabbvabnp paribascaixacommerzbankcredit suissedeutsche bankintesamergermonte paschisantanderUBIubsunicredit

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Zalando’s EU Court Loss Harmless; Real Threats Are Weak Demand, Shein and Temu

Editorial
Editorial
September 4, 2025
Covestro’s 10% Drop: Merger Arbitrage Opportunity or Value Trap?
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?