Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Reading: EU Hits Google with €2.95 Billion Fine and Warns of Possible Adtech Breakup
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

EU Hits Google with €2.95 Billion Fine and Warns of Possible Adtech Breakup

Editorial
Last updated: September 5, 2025 5:25 pm
Editorial
Published September 5, 2025
Share
Photo by BoliviaInteligente on Unsplash

The European Commission has fined Google €2.95 billion for abusing its dominant position in the display advertising technology (Adtech) sector and has ordered the company to end its illegal practices.

“Google abused its power by favouring its own adtech services to the detriment of rivals, advertisers and publishers,” said Executive Vice-President Teresa Ribera. “This behaviour harmed competition, raised costs for businesses, and ultimately hit European consumers with higher prices and lower-quality services. This is illegal under EU competition rules.”

The Commission found that Google engaged in anticompetitive conduct on both sides of the Adtech supply chain. By leveraging its dominance, the company raised advertising costs for businesses, which were often passed on to consumers, while at the same time reducing revenues for publishers. This distortion of competition lasted for more than a decade and affected the entire European Economic Area.

Given that this is Google’s third major breach of EU competition rules, the Commission increased the fine. Ribera stressed, however, that financial penalties alone are not enough. Google is required to end its illegal conduct and address the inherent conflict of interest in its Adtech business. The company has 60 days to present a viable plan, failing which the Commission is prepared to impose its own remedy. At this stage, structural measures, such as divestiture of part of Google’s Adtech operations, appear both necessary and proportionate.

The decision also carries a global dimension. A U.S. federal court recently upheld key claims in a Department of Justice case against Google that closely mirrors the Commission’s findings. Ribera highlighted the importance of a coordinated transatlantic approach, noting that “it is in everyone’s interest to achieve a joint outcome to ensure effective remedies for citizens worldwide.”

Reaffirming the EU’s commitment to fair and transparent enforcement, Ribera concluded: “Our founding Treaties, our laws, and our values are not up for debate. We will continue to apply the rules firmly and fairly, without fear or favour.”

You Might Also Like

Norway’s Food Retailers Receive Substantial Reduction in Antitrust Fines

Judge Rules Visa Must Face New Debit Card Antitrust Case

ICE Has an Easy Way Out in Mortgage Software M&A if Needed

Antitrust Scrutiny on India’s Quick Commerce Giants: A Deepening Controversy

Microsoft’s Acquisition of Inflection AI: What the CMA Found and What It Means

TAGGED:Adtechbig techEUeuropean commissionfinegoogle

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Zalando’s EU Court Loss Harmless; Real Threats Are Weak Demand, Shein and Temu

Editorial
Editorial
September 4, 2025
Covestro’s 10% Drop: Merger Arbitrage Opportunity or Value Trap?
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?