Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Sign in
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • For Lawyers
    For Lawyers
    Here, you’ll find the regulatory trends and hidden market shifts that others miss. You’ll learn where markets (and your clients’ industries) are heading—and how to…
    Show More
    Latest News
    Apple, Meta Refusal to Comply with EU rules May Bring New Fines, But Profits Too
    July 20, 2025
    Getty Images + Shutterstock: A Deal That Puts UK Regulator to the Test
    July 16, 2025
    Meta Bets Big on Smart Glasses, But Money is on Ads, Not Hardware
    July 15, 2025
    OpenAI–Google AI Browser War Exposes Limits of EU Tech Rules
    July 14, 2025
  • For Investors
    For Investors
    Regulatory events move markets—often faster than earnings reports. A merger approval or a hefty fine can send a stock soaring or sinking in a day.…
    Show More
    Latest News
    New EU rules targeting Shein and Temu Likely to Benefit Zalando
    July 18, 2025
    Symrise: How to benefit from a Cartel Investigation
    July 16, 2025
    Bank Pekao: On Its Way to lead Poland’s financial sector
    July 14, 2025
    Nexi: Solid Numbers With Regulatory Events as Catalysts
    July 14, 2025
  • News
    News
    Stay informed with our global antitrust news compilation—bringing you the latest developments, regulatory updates, and key cases from around the world, all in one place
    Show More
    Latest News
    CNMC Clears Esseco’s Takeover of Ercros with Conditions
    July 21, 2025
    EU Launches Legal Action Against Spain Over Bank Merger Rules
    July 21, 2025
    Zuckerberg, Meta Executives Settle $8 Billion Privacy Lawsuit
    July 18, 2025
    Turkish Authority Opens Antitrust Probe into Mastercard and Visa
    July 18, 2025
  • What We Offer
  • Prices
Reading: Elon Musk Supports Bill to Merge FTC and DOJ Antitrust Divisions
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • What We Offer
  • Prices
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Elon Musk Supports Bill to Merge FTC and DOJ Antitrust Divisions

Editorial
Last updated: March 10, 2025 9:45 am
Editorial
Published March 2, 2025
Share

Elon Musk, the billionaire entrepreneur and advocate for government efficiency, has publicly endorsed a legislative proposal aimed at consolidating antitrust enforcement under a single agency.

The proposal, known as the One Agency Act, seeks to transfer antitrust authority from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Reuters reported. This move has sparked significant debate, with supporters arguing for streamlined oversight and critics warning of weakened competition protections.

Musk signaled his approval of the proposal via a post on X, formerly known as Twitter, in response to U.S. Senator Mike Lee’s statement supporting the bill. Senator Lee, a Republican from Utah, has long championed the consolidation of federal antitrust enforcement, asserting that maintaining two agencies with overlapping responsibilities is inefficient. “We should no more have two antitrust agencies than two presidents of the United States—no more than the Catholic Church should have two popes,” Lee stated.

Currently, both the FTC and DOJ share jurisdiction over antitrust matters, with the DOJ primarily handling criminal cases and the FTC focusing on civil enforcement. This division has existed for over a century, with each agency playing a critical role in monitoring and curbing anticompetitive business practices. If the One Agency Act were enacted, the FTC would retain its consumer protection responsibilities but lose its authority to regulate unfair methods of competition—a power it has used to take legal action against major corporations, including pharmacy benefit managers in 2024.

While proponents, including Musk, argue that consolidating antitrust enforcement under the DOJ would eliminate bureaucratic redundancies and improve government efficiency, opponents express concerns that the move would significantly weaken competition oversight. Democratic lawmakers have voiced fears that stripping the FTC of its authority would hinder efforts to prevent monopolistic practices and protect market competition.

The bill, originally proposed by Lee in 2020, has been reintroduced in the U.S. House of Representatives by Representative Ben Cline, a Republican from Virginia. Under the proposed legislation, the head of the DOJ’s antitrust division would gain the authority to restructure the newly merged agency, further reshaping federal competition enforcement.

The debate over antitrust enforcement reform is likely to continue, with policymakers weighing the potential benefits of streamlined regulation against the risk of diminishing critical oversight mechanisms. While Musk’s support lends visibility to the initiative, the broader implications of the One Agency Act remain a contentious issue among lawmakers, regulatory experts, and business leaders.

You Might Also Like

EU Defends Digital Markets Act, Denies Targeting U.S. Tech Giants

InPost Buys Yodel, Becomes UK’s #3 Logistics Player

Spanish Regulator Imposes Hefty Fines on Amazon and Apple

Zalando Challenges EU Tech Regulations, Argues Distinction from Amazon and AliExpress

Vestager Confirms DMA Will “Enter Into Force” Next Spring

TAGGED:antitrustDOJftcMusk

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

New EU rules targeting Shein and Temu Likely to Benefit Zalando

Editorial
Editorial
July 18, 2025
Symrise: How to benefit from a Cartel Investigation
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?