Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Reading: China’s Antitrust Probe into Google: A New Trade Battle
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

China’s Antitrust Probe into Google: A New Trade Battle

Editorial
Last updated: March 10, 2025 9:45 am
Editorial
Published February 4, 2025
Share

China has announced an antitrust investigation into Google, marking a significant development in the ongoing trade tensions between Beijing and Washington, as Reuters reported.

The investigation, initiated by the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR), follows the imposition of tariffs by the U.S. government on Chinese products. In addition to the probe, China has introduced retaliatory tariffs on various U.S. imports, including coal, liquefied natural gas, crude oil, and certain industrial machinery.

Google’s Complex Relationship with China

Google’s relationship with China has been fraught with challenges and regulatory roadblocks. The tech giant first entered the Chinese market in 2006 with a localized, censored search engine, google.cn. By 2009, it held a substantial share of the Chinese search engine market, approximately 36%. However, in 2010, citing cybersecurity concerns and increasing restrictions on information access, Google ceased its search engine operations in China. The company redirected users to its Hong Kong-based site, a move that led to the eventual blocking of Google’s services, including Gmail and Chrome, under China’s Great Firewall.

Despite its withdrawal from the Chinese search market, Google maintains limited operations in the country, particularly in advertising services that support Chinese businesses seeking international outreach.

The Antitrust Investigation and Its Implications

China’s decision to launch an antitrust probe into Google aligns with broader regulatory scrutiny the company faces globally. The investigation comes amid escalating trade frictions between the two economic superpowers, signaling a possible strategic response to U.S. measures against Chinese firms.

The inquiry will assess whether Google has engaged in monopolistic practices that violate China’s anti-monopoly laws. While details of the alleged violations remain unspecified, similar investigations have been conducted by other global regulatory bodies. In the U.S., Google lost a lawsuit in August 2023 after being accused of monopolizing the general search market and creating significant barriers to competition. Furthermore, the U.S. Department of Justice has advocated for the divestiture of Google’s Chrome browser to enhance market competition.

The United Kingdom’s Competition and Markets Authority is also currently investigating Google under new regulatory frameworks assessing companies with significant market influence.

Trade and Regulatory Context

China’s announcement of the antitrust probe coincides with its imposition of new tariffs on U.S. goods. The country’s finance ministry stated that, effective February 10, tariffs of 15% would be applied to U.S. coal and liquefied natural gas, while crude oil, agricultural machinery, and certain vehicles would face an additional 10% tariff. These measures reflect China’s broader strategy of countering U.S. economic policies targeting Chinese enterprises.

Potential Outcomes

The antitrust investigation into Google could have multiple possible outcomes. Experts suggest that it may conclude without penalties, similar to some past regulatory inquiries. However, the probe may also lead to restrictions on Google’s business operations in China or potential fines if violations are confirmed.

Regardless of the final decision, the investigation underscores the deepening complexities in U.S.-China relations, particularly in the technology sector. It also highlights the growing role of antitrust enforcement as a geopolitical tool in international trade disputes.

You Might Also Like

EU Commission Probes ADNOC’s Planned Acquisition of Covestro Over Foreign Subsidy Concerns

Sutter Health Reaches Settlement in Long-Running Antitrust Case

Finland Opens Probe Into Suspected Asphalt Cartel

Brazil Investigates Ericsson for Alleged 5G Patent Abuses

Deadline Set for Interest in Seven & i and Couche-Tard U.S. Stores

TAGGED:chinagooglemonopolySAMRUS tariffs

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Covestro’s 10% Drop: Merger Arbitrage Opportunity or Value Trap?

Editorial
Editorial
September 9, 2025
Zalando’s EU Court Loss Harmless; Real Threats Are Weak Demand, Shein and Temu
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?