Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What it is?
  • Antitrust Club
    • What it is?
Reading: Brazil’s Antitrust Authority Reaches Three Agreements in Gun Jumping Cases
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What it is?
  • Antitrust Club
    • What it is?
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Brazil’s Antitrust Authority Reaches Three Agreements in Gun Jumping Cases

Editorial
Last updated: September 12, 2025 9:12 am
Editorial
Published September 12, 2025
Share
Photo by Samuel Costa Melo on Unsplash

The Administrative Council for Economic Defense (CADE) has signed three agreements in cases involving mergers carried out before official clearance, a practice known as gun jumping. The agreements, announced on 3 September, will result in companies paying more than BRL 1.5 million (USD 278,000) in financial contributions to Brazil’s Fund for De Facto Joint Rights.

The first two cases involved Mitsui & Co., Mitsui O.S.K. Lines (MOL), Marine Projects Investment (MPIC) and Modec Holdings Netherlands (MHNL). CADE found that the companies completed two transactions related to offshore platform vessels before submitting them for approval. The first concerned the acquisition of equity in Marlim1 MV33 B.V., responsible for the Anita Garibaldi platform vessel in the Marlim field. Although the deal met the legal criteria under Article 90 of Law 12.529/2011, it was finalized in 2020 and only notified to CADE in 2024.

The second case concerned the acquisition of equity in Búzios5 MV32 B.V., operator of the FPSO Almirante Barroso unit. Mitsui, MOL and MPIC acquired shares and signed a shareholders’ agreement in 2019, but only notified CADE in March 2024. Both transactions, according to CADE commissioners, were subject to mandatory prior notification.

The third agreement involved the acquisition of assets from Cia. Paraná de Alimentos S.A. (Paraná Supermercados) by Cooperativa Agroindustrial Copagril (Copagril). The transaction was completed in December 2023 but notified only in July 2025, following CADE’s determination that it constituted gun jumping.

By signing settlement agreements in these cases, the companies avoided prolonged litigation but accepted financial penalties. The contributions, exceeding BRL 1.5 million (USD 278,000) in total, underscore CADE’s determination to enforce Brazil’s merger control rules and deter future violations of mandatory pre-merger notification requirements.

You Might Also Like

ARGENTINA: ¿Puede el regulator revertir la venta de Telefónica a Telecom?

Brazil Investigates Alleged Bus Transport Cartel

ICE’s Target Black Knight Sells Unit to Ease Antitrust Concerns

Schlumberger’s Acquisition of ChampionX Under CMA Scrutiny

Google Urges EU Court To Scrap $1.6 billion Ad Fine

TAGGED:agreementBrazilCADEGun Jumping

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Financial Analysis

Getty Stock Raises 10% In a Day, But October Will Be Bumpy

Editorial
Editorial
October 5, 2025
Which Cartellist is a “Buy” Opportunity?
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Insights
  • Financial Analysis
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?