Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • What We Offer
Reading: Mexico’s IFT Fines Telcel and Oxxo $96 Million for Anticompetitive Practices in SIM Card Sales
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • What We Offer
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
oxxo and telcel
News

Mexico’s IFT Fines Telcel and Oxxo $96 Million for Anticompetitive Practices in SIM Card Sales

Editorial
Last updated: June 18, 2025 9:10 am
Editorial
Published June 18, 2025
Share

The Federal Telecommunications Institute (IFT), Mexico’s telecommunications regulator, has imposed fines totaling approximately $96 million USD on several companies for engaging in anticompetitive conduct in the distribution of SIM cards through convenience store chains.

Telcel Hit with Largest Sanction

Radiomóvil Dipsa, the operator of Telcel and a subsidiary of América Móvil, received the largest penalty: 1.7826 billion pesos (roughly $93.8 million USD). The IFT concluded that Telcel engaged in relative monopolistic practices on a national scale by influencing how SIM cards were sold through dominant convenience store chains—including Oxxo, 7-Eleven, Extra, and Circle K—which jointly controlled 93% of the relevant retail channel in 2023.

Telcel has strongly contested the ruling, calling the fine “disproportionate and biased,” and claims it represents 3.03% of the company’s Q1 2025 revenue. In a public statement, Telcel rejected the accusation of anticompetitive conduct, criticizing the IFT’s investigation as “based on claims from a competitor” and “lacking in objectivity and evidence.” The company has pledged to exhaust all legal avenues to overturn the decision.

Oxxo and IMMEX Also Penalized

The IFT also sanctioned two of Telcel’s retail partners. Oxxo and Impulsora de Mercados de México (IMMEX) were each fined 19.5 million pesos (about $1 million USD) for their role in the alleged conduct. This brings the total fine for all parties involved to 1.8216 billion pesos, or approximately $95.8 million USD.

Investigation Origin and Broader Scope

The investigation began in August 2021 and was publicly disclosed in December 2021, following a formal complaint—reportedly by Telcel’s rival, AT&T Mexico. The IFT clarified that the probe focused on the entire national market and was not initially targeted at any specific company.

According to the IFT, the case involved possible violations of Articles 54 and 56, Section I of Mexico’s Federal Economic Competition Law, particularly concerning exclusive dealing arrangements and market foreclosure tactics in the sale and distribution of SIM cards.

The retail channel under scrutiny includes not only convenience stores but also major self-service and department store chains such as Walmart, Soriana, Suburbia, Liverpool, and Coppel. This suggests that further enforcement actions may be forthcoming.

Prior Sanctions and Pending Legal Reform

This is not Telcel’s first sanction. In September 2024, the IFT fined the company 90.66 million pesos for offering incentives to distributors in Colima, Jalisco, and Michoacán to stop selling competitors’ SIM cards and instead promote only Telcel’s products.

The present fine could still be overturned through Mexico’s judicial system, including commercial courts, telecom-specialized appellate courts, and potentially the Supreme Court of Justice.

This ruling also comes at a time of regulatory transition. The IFT is expected to be dissolved within the next five weeks and replaced by a new federal body, the Agency for Digital Transformation and Telecommunications (ATDT), as part of pending legislative reforms. The future of competition enforcement in the telecom sector under this new agency remains uncertain.

You Might Also Like

Google Accuses India’s Antitrust Watchdog of Favoring Amazon

U.S. Department of Justice Considers Breaking Up Google

Independent Porsche Parts Reseller Files Antitrust Claim Against Porsche UK Entities

Meta Faces Tougher Antitrust Oversight in Germany

Minor Fines to Three Retailer In Ireland For Misleading Discount Practices

TAGGED:anticompetitive practicesAntitrust fineIFTMexicooxxoSIM cardtelcel

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Microsoft, Google & Amazon Soar in the Cloud While Watchdogs Hit Snooze

Editorial
Editorial
August 3, 2025
Telefónica’s M&A Ambitions Meet Reality Check After Q2 Results
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?