Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Sign in
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • For Lawyers
    For Lawyers
    Here, you’ll find the regulatory trends and hidden market shifts that others miss. You’ll learn where markets (and your clients’ industries) are heading—and how to…
    Show More
    Latest News
    Apple, Meta Refusal to Comply with EU rules May Bring New Fines, But Profits Too
    July 20, 2025
    Getty Images + Shutterstock: A Deal That Puts UK Regulator to the Test
    July 16, 2025
    Meta Bets Big on Smart Glasses, But Money is on Ads, Not Hardware
    July 15, 2025
    OpenAI–Google AI Browser War Exposes Limits of EU Tech Rules
    July 14, 2025
  • For Investors
    For Investors
    Regulatory events move markets—often faster than earnings reports. A merger approval or a hefty fine can send a stock soaring or sinking in a day.…
    Show More
    Latest News
    New EU rules targeting Shein and Temu Likely to Benefit Zalando
    July 18, 2025
    Symrise: How to benefit from a Cartel Investigation
    July 16, 2025
    Bank Pekao: On Its Way to lead Poland’s financial sector
    July 14, 2025
    Nexi: Solid Numbers With Regulatory Events as Catalysts
    July 14, 2025
  • News
    News
    Stay informed with our global antitrust news compilation—bringing you the latest developments, regulatory updates, and key cases from around the world, all in one place
    Show More
    Latest News
    CNMC Clears Esseco’s Takeover of Ercros with Conditions
    July 21, 2025
    EU Launches Legal Action Against Spain Over Bank Merger Rules
    July 21, 2025
    Zuckerberg, Meta Executives Settle $8 Billion Privacy Lawsuit
    July 18, 2025
    Turkish Authority Opens Antitrust Probe into Mastercard and Visa
    July 18, 2025
  • What We Offer
  • Prices
Reading: Brazil Fines Companies for Gun Jumping Violations
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • What We Offer
  • Prices
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Brazil Fines Companies for Gun Jumping Violations

Editorial
Last updated: April 14, 2025 11:47 am
Editorial
Published April 14, 2025
Share
Image by usertrmk on Freepik

The Administrative Council for Economic Defense (CADE), Brazil’s competition authority, has imposed penalties on automotive companies for violating merger notification rules.

Contents
Fines Against Renauto and Navesa for Unnotified DealGrupo Dahruj Case: Multiple Transactions Without Clearance

The most recent decision, issued during CADE’s 245th Ordinary Session, targets a 2025 transaction involving Renauto Veículos e Peças Ltda and Navesa Nacional de Veículos Ltda, with additional sanctions stemming from a series of past transactions involving Grupo Dahruj.

Fines Against Renauto and Navesa for Unnotified Deal

CADE fined Renauto and Navesa approximately BRL 5.36 million (USD 1.07 million) for gun jumping after the two companies completed a concentration act without the authority’s prior approval. In March 2025, Renauto transferred various tangible and intangible assets—such as tools, parts, machinery, and dealership facilities—to Navesa, in the context of operating Renault do Brasil S.A. dealerships in Goiânia (GO).

The General Superintendence at CADE initiated proceedings in 2020, determining through a Technical Note that the transaction between Renauto and Navesa required mandatory notification. Although the CADE Tribunal formally ruled in August 2023 that the transaction was notifiable, the parties failed to submit the merger filing until November 2024. The process was only concluded in February 2025, long after the deal had been implemented.

Commissioner Camila Pires Alves, rapporteur in the case, confirmed the violation and CADE unanimously approved the decision, holding both companies liable for prematurely closing the deal.

Grupo Dahruj Case: Multiple Transactions Without Clearance

In a separate decision, CADE sanctioned six companies—Automec, Andreta, Tempo, Dahruj, Arguri, and Mais Distribuidora—connected to Grupo Dahruj for failing to notify eight transactions conducted over the past five years.

Launched in 2020, the investigation concluded in August 2023, with Commissioner Gustavo Augusto affirming that each transaction was implemented without prior notification. Although CADE’s General Superintendence later cleared all the deals without objections, the authority emphasized that skipping the notification process violated Brazil’s merger control regime.

CADE ordered the companies to pay a total fine of BRL 5.9 million (USD 1.18 million), with the funds directed to the Fund for De Facto Joint Rights (FDD) under the Ministry of Justice and Public Security.

These rulings reinforce CADE’s strict stance on procedural compliance, underscoring the obligation of companies to seek regulatory approval before executing transactions subject to notification.

You Might Also Like

UniCredit Secures ECB Approval to Increase Commerzbank Stake to 29.9%

Amazon Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Lawsuit Over Cloud Networking Practices

Italy Fines Tour Operators €20M Over Colosseum Ticket Practices

Chile Seeks $74M Fine Against Pedidos Ya and Glovo Over Market-Sharing Deal

U.S. Revises Antitrust Case Against Google, Drops AI Divestiture Demand

TAGGED:automotive companiesBrazilCADEGun JumpingRenauto

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

New EU rules targeting Shein and Temu Likely to Benefit Zalando

Editorial
Editorial
July 18, 2025
Symrise: How to benefit from a Cartel Investigation
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?