Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Sign in
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • For Lawyers
    For Lawyers
    Here, you’ll find the regulatory trends and hidden market shifts that others miss. You’ll learn where markets (and your clients’ industries) are heading—and how to…
    Show More
    Latest News
    Apple, Meta Refusal to Comply with EU rules May Bring New Fines, But Profits Too
    July 20, 2025
    Getty Images + Shutterstock: A Deal That Puts UK Regulator to the Test
    July 16, 2025
    Meta Bets Big on Smart Glasses, But Money is on Ads, Not Hardware
    July 15, 2025
    OpenAI–Google AI Browser War Exposes Limits of EU Tech Rules
    July 14, 2025
  • For Investors
    For Investors
    Regulatory events move markets—often faster than earnings reports. A merger approval or a hefty fine can send a stock soaring or sinking in a day.…
    Show More
    Latest News
    New EU rules targeting Shein and Temu Likely to Benefit Zalando
    July 18, 2025
    Symrise: How to benefit from a Cartel Investigation
    July 16, 2025
    Bank Pekao: On Its Way to lead Poland’s financial sector
    July 14, 2025
    Nexi: Solid Numbers With Regulatory Events as Catalysts
    July 14, 2025
  • News
    News
    Stay informed with our global antitrust news compilation—bringing you the latest developments, regulatory updates, and key cases from around the world, all in one place
    Show More
    Latest News
    CNMC Clears Esseco’s Takeover of Ercros with Conditions
    July 21, 2025
    EU Launches Legal Action Against Spain Over Bank Merger Rules
    July 21, 2025
    Zuckerberg, Meta Executives Settle $8 Billion Privacy Lawsuit
    July 18, 2025
    Turkish Authority Opens Antitrust Probe into Mastercard and Visa
    July 18, 2025
  • Why Join?
  • Memberships
Reading: Sports Direct Settles Antitrust Dispute Over Newcastle United Replica Kit
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Why Join?
  • Memberships
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Sports Direct Settles Antitrust Dispute Over Newcastle United Replica Kit

Editorial
Last updated: March 10, 2025 9:45 am
Editorial
Published March 3, 2025
Share
Photo by Jannes Glas on Unsplash

The long-running competition dispute between SportsDirect.com Retail Limited and Newcastle United Football Club has been settled by consent, bringing an end to legal proceedings that centered on allegations of anti-competitive behavior in the wholesale and retail supply of replica football kits.

Contents
Background of the CaseLegal Developments and Tribunal RulingsKey Allegations Against Newcastle United and AdidasSettlement

Background of the Case

The case originated from a claim filed on 15 March 2024 by Sports Direct, part of the Frasers Group plc, against Newcastle United Football Club, its parent company Newcastle United Limited, and major sportswear retailers JD Sports Fashion Plc, Adidas (UK) Limited, and Adidas AG.

Sports Direct alleged that Newcastle United had abused its dominant position in the wholesale supply of replica kits by granting JD Sports exclusive third-party retail rights to sell the club’s official merchandise. The claim argued that this foreclosed Sports Direct from the market, limiting consumer choice and eliminating effective competition.

Sports Direct further contended that if this exclusivity arrangement stemmed from agreements between Newcastle United and Adidas or JD Sports, those agreements themselves violated UK competition law by engaging in anti-competitive exclusivity provisions.

Legal Developments and Tribunal Rulings

Throughout 2024, the case saw multiple hearings and legal maneuvers:

  • April 2024: Sports Direct sought an injunction to prevent Newcastle United and its partners from enforcing the exclusive supply arrangement. However, the Competition Appeal Tribunal rejected the injunction application, a decision later upheld by the Court of Appeal in May 2024.
  • October 2024: Following a Case Management Conference (CMC), Adidas (UK) Limited and Adidas AG were formally joined to the proceedings.
  • February 2025: The case was officially settled, with a Tomlin Order issued on 24 February 2025, confirming the terms agreed in a confidential settlement agreement dated 20 February 2025.

Key Allegations Against Newcastle United and Adidas

Sports Direct’s claim primarily focused on the wholesale supply of Newcastle United replica kits, which are high-demand items among fans. Historically, Sports Direct had stocked and sold Newcastle United kits through a long-standing agreement with the club’s previous kit supplier, Castore. However, Newcastle United terminated its contract with Castore and entered a new agreement with Adidas as its exclusive manufacturer for the 2024/25 season and beyond.

Sports Direct argued that Newcastle United’s decision to reserve wholesale distribution rights exclusively for itself—while allowing only JD Sports as an external retailer—created an anti-competitive market structure. The retailer claimed that this:

  1. Prevented fair competition by blocking Sports Direct from accessing wholesale supply.
  2. Violated Chapter II of the Competition Act 1998, which prohibits the abuse of market dominance.
  3. Potentially breached Chapter I of the Act, if exclusivity agreements between Newcastle United, JD Sports, and Adidas contained anti-competitive clauses.

Settlement

Under the Tomlin Order issued by the Competition Appeal Tribunal, the case has been stayed, meaning no further proceedings will take place unless required to enforce the settlement terms.

While the full details of the confidential settlement agreement remain undisclosed, it marks the end of the legal battle between Sports Direct and Newcastle United over replica kit distribution rights.

This case highlights ongoing scrutiny in the sports retail sector, particularly regarding exclusive supply agreements between football clubs, kit manufacturers, and retailers. It also underscores the importance of fair competition in ensuring that fans have access to club merchandise through multiple retail channels.

You Might Also Like

DPG Media’s RTL Deal Gets Green Light from Dutch Regulator — With Major Strings Attached

Czech Competition Office Investigates TV Station for Potencial Abuse of Dominance

Spain’s CNMC Fines Booking.com €413 Million for Anticompetitive Practices

Spain Investigates Agricultural Machinery Distributors for Possible Anticompetitive Practices

Brazil Investigates Ericsson for Alleged 5G Patent Abuses

TAGGED:antitrustFootball ClubNewcastle UnitedReplica Kitsettled by consentSports Direct

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Symrise: How to benefit from a Cartel Investigation

Editorial
Editorial
July 16, 2025
New EU rules targeting Shein and Temu Likely to Benefit Zalando
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?