Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Sign in
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • For Lawyers
    For Lawyers
    Here, you’ll find the regulatory trends and hidden market shifts that others miss. You’ll learn where markets (and your clients’ industries) are heading—and how to…
    Show More
    Latest News
    Apple, Meta Refusal to Comply with EU rules May Bring New Fines, But Profits Too
    July 20, 2025
    Getty Images + Shutterstock: A Deal That Puts UK Regulator to the Test
    July 16, 2025
    Meta Bets Big on Smart Glasses, But Money is on Ads, Not Hardware
    July 15, 2025
    OpenAI–Google AI Browser War Exposes Limits of EU Tech Rules
    July 14, 2025
  • For Investors
    For Investors
    Regulatory events move markets—often faster than earnings reports. A merger approval or a hefty fine can send a stock soaring or sinking in a day.…
    Show More
    Latest News
    New EU rules targeting Shein and Temu Likely to Benefit Zalando
    July 18, 2025
    Symrise: How to benefit from a Cartel Investigation
    July 16, 2025
    Bank Pekao: On Its Way to lead Poland’s financial sector
    July 14, 2025
    Nexi: Solid Numbers With Regulatory Events as Catalysts
    July 14, 2025
  • News
    News
    Stay informed with our global antitrust news compilation—bringing you the latest developments, regulatory updates, and key cases from around the world, all in one place
    Show More
    Latest News
    CNMC Clears Esseco’s Takeover of Ercros with Conditions
    July 21, 2025
    EU Launches Legal Action Against Spain Over Bank Merger Rules
    July 21, 2025
    Zuckerberg, Meta Executives Settle $8 Billion Privacy Lawsuit
    July 18, 2025
    Turkish Authority Opens Antitrust Probe into Mastercard and Visa
    July 18, 2025
  • What We Offer
  • Prices
Reading: Meta Faces Investigation by Polish Authorities Over Facebook Content Display Practices
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • What We Offer
  • Prices
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Meta Faces Investigation by Polish Authorities Over Facebook Content Display Practices

Editorial
Last updated: March 10, 2025 9:45 am
Editorial
Published October 24, 2024
Share

The Polish Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (UOKiK) has launched an investigation into Meta, the parent company of Facebook, following recent changes to how content from Polish publishers is displayed on the platform.

Contents
Meta’s Market Influence Under ScrutinyConnection to EU Copyright DirectiveMeta’s Response to Polish Copyright LawBroader Implications and International Disputes
Photo by Mariia Shalabaieva on Unsplash

The UOKiK, led by President Tomasz Chróstny, is examining whether Meta’s modifications to content display could represent an abuse of its dominant market position. This move follows concerns that the changes, which limit posts linking to news articles to only a hyperlink and headline, may have negatively affected the visibility and engagement of journalistic content.

Meta’s Market Influence Under Scrutiny

Facebook has become a critical distribution platform for news publishers, with many users turning to the social media giant for current events from Poland and the surrounding region. By altering the format in which news articles are presented—previously shown with graphics and text previews—Meta’s decision has potentially reduced reader engagement and led to fewer article views. According to President Chróstny, the explanatory proceeding aims to determine whether Meta’s practices violated competition and consumer protection laws by leveraging its dominant position in a way that disadvantages publishers.

The investigation, however, is currently focused on the company’s practices rather than targeting any specific entity. Should the evidence support UOKiK’s concerns, formal antitrust proceedings will be initiated. Businesses found guilty of anti-competitive behavior in Poland could face fines of up to 10% of their annual revenue.

Connection to EU Copyright Directive

The changes implemented by Meta appear to be linked to Poland’s recent adaptation of the European Union’s Copyright Directive (DSM Directive), which was incorporated into Polish law in September 2023. This legislation guarantees publishers and content creators the right to negotiate compensation for their content used on digital platforms like Facebook. The directive aims to ensure that press publishers and audiovisual creators are fairly remunerated for the distribution of their work online.

Under the new law, if publishers and platforms fail to reach an agreement on compensation, a mediation process can be initiated, with the Polish Office of Electronic Communications (UKE) responsible for resolving disputes. The law is intended to provide a framework for fair negotiations, ensuring that digital platforms cannot exploit content without proper remuneration.

Meta’s Response to Polish Copyright Law

Meta has defended its actions, stating that the change in how articles are displayed on Facebook in Poland was a direct response to the country’s implementation of Article 15 of the EU Copyright Directive. According to Meta, this step was taken out of legal caution while awaiting clarification from the European Court of Justice, which is reviewing a similar case in Italy.

In a statement, Meta emphasized that news content does not constitute a significant source of revenue for the platform, representing less than 3% of the content viewed by users globally. The company also noted that feedback from users indicates they do not want political or news content to dominate their feeds. Meta further argued that Poland’s implementation of the EU directive goes beyond its intended scope, infringing on the freedom to contract and conduct business.

Broader Implications and International Disputes

Meta’s clash with Polish authorities mirrors similar disputes in other countries where the company has resisted compensation obligations for local publishers. In Canada, for example, Facebook completely blocked access to news content after the government imposed requirements for compensating local media. In contrast, Australia managed to avoid such a standoff through negotiations between the government, media outlets, and platforms. In Italy, Meta has challenged amendments to copyright law at the European Court of Justice, with proceedings still in the early stages.

The controversy in Poland highlights broader tensions between Big Tech and governments seeking to regulate digital platforms and ensure fair compensation for content creators. While Poland’s law aims to provide a balanced solution, Meta’s reaction—limiting the visibility of news content—has raised concerns that the company may be leveraging its market dominance to avoid compliance with the new regulations.

You Might Also Like

Japan FTC Designates Specified Software Operators Under New Competition Act

Uber Sues DoorDash Over Food-Delivery Practices

EU Court Upholds Bond Cartel Fines for UBS, Trims Penalties for Nomura and UniCredit

NFL Faces Antitrust Lawsuit Over Bluesky Ban

New EU Guidelines Revise When Competitors Can Cooperate

TAGGED:antitrustEuropean Union’s Copyright Directivemetathe Polish Office of Competition and Consumer ProtectionUOKiK

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Symrise: How to benefit from a Cartel Investigation

Editorial
Editorial
July 16, 2025
New EU rules targeting Shein and Temu Likely to Benefit Zalando
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?