Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Sign in
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • For Lawyers
    For Lawyers
    Here, you’ll find the regulatory trends and hidden market shifts that others miss. You’ll learn where markets (and your clients’ industries) are heading—and how to…
    Show More
    Latest News
    Apple, Meta Refusal to Comply with EU rules May Bring New Fines, But Profits Too
    July 20, 2025
    Getty Images + Shutterstock: A Deal That Puts UK Regulator to the Test
    July 16, 2025
    Meta Bets Big on Smart Glasses, But Money is on Ads, Not Hardware
    July 15, 2025
    OpenAI–Google AI Browser War Exposes Limits of EU Tech Rules
    July 14, 2025
  • For Investors
    For Investors
    Regulatory events move markets—often faster than earnings reports. A merger approval or a hefty fine can send a stock soaring or sinking in a day.…
    Show More
    Latest News
    New EU rules targeting Shein and Temu Likely to Benefit Zalando
    July 18, 2025
    Symrise: How to benefit from a Cartel Investigation
    July 16, 2025
    Bank Pekao: On Its Way to lead Poland’s financial sector
    July 14, 2025
    Nexi: Solid Numbers With Regulatory Events as Catalysts
    July 14, 2025
  • News
    News
    Stay informed with our global antitrust news compilation—bringing you the latest developments, regulatory updates, and key cases from around the world, all in one place
    Show More
    Latest News
    CNMC Clears Esseco’s Takeover of Ercros with Conditions
    July 21, 2025
    EU Launches Legal Action Against Spain Over Bank Merger Rules
    July 21, 2025
    Zuckerberg, Meta Executives Settle $8 Billion Privacy Lawsuit
    July 18, 2025
    Turkish Authority Opens Antitrust Probe into Mastercard and Visa
    July 18, 2025
  • What We Offer
  • Prices
Reading: Pfizer’s $25.5 Million Effexor XR Antitrust Settlement Marks Turning Point in Long-standing Legal Battle
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • What We Offer
  • Prices
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Pfizer’s $25.5 Million Effexor XR Antitrust Settlement Marks Turning Point in Long-standing Legal Battle

Editorial
Last updated: March 10, 2025 9:45 am
Editorial
Published April 30, 2024
Share
Photo by Pixabay: https://www.pexels.com/photo/20-mg-label-blister-pack-208512/

The Effexor XR Antitrust Litigation, centered around allegations of collusion between pharmaceutical giant Pfizer’s predecessor, Wyeth, and competitor Teva, has taken a significant turn with Pfizer’s agreement to a $25.5 million settlement.

This settlement aims to address claims of conspiring to delay the release of a more affordable generic version of the widely-used antidepressant Effexor XR. The recent agreement follows closely on the heels of a $39 million settlement disclosed earlier this month. Legal representatives for the plaintiffs have taken proactive steps by filing a motion seeking approval from a federal judge in New Jersey for the proposed settlement. Should the settlement gain judicial approval, it will primarily benefit a class of “indirect purchasers” who acquired Effexor XR through intermediaries rather than directly from Wyeth. Notably, the proposed allocation of settlement funds designates 78% to third-party payors, including insurance companies and employee health plans, with the remaining 22% earmarked for individual consumers. Plaintiffs’ attorneys stand to receive approximately $8.7 million, representing 34% of the total settlement amount. While Pfizer has not admitted wrongdoing, the company expressed in a statement that it views the settlement as equitable, reasonable, and the most expedient means to resolve the ongoing litigation. Lead attorney for the plaintiffs, James Cecchi, opted not to provide additional commentary on the matter. In addition to the recent $25.5 million settlement, a separate $39 million settlement, subject to judicial approval earlier this month, pertained to a distinct class of purchasers who acquired Effexor XR directly from Wyeth, including drug wholesalers. Should these settlements receive judicial approval, they would mark the culmination of over 12 years of legal disputes surrounding allegations that Wyeth’s collaboration with Teva violated U.S. antitrust laws. Notably, Teva remains excluded from the settlement agreements, indicating that legal proceedings against the company will continue unabated.

You Might Also Like

Uber Sues DoorDash Over Food-Delivery Practices

Italian Regulator Investigates Rail Operator for Limiting SNCF’s Market Access

EU Regulator’s Concerns Threat Adobe’s $20 Billion Bid for Figma

U.S. Merger Changes Will Increase Timelines, Costs for Companies

NCLAT Reduces CCI’s Fine on Google in Play Store Case by 75%

TAGGED:antitrust litigationEffexorXRPfizerpharmasettlmentTeva

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

New EU rules targeting Shein and Temu Likely to Benefit Zalando

Editorial
Editorial
July 18, 2025
Symrise: How to benefit from a Cartel Investigation
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?