Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Reading: EU Court Sides with Qualcomm in $1Bn Antitrust Fine
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

EU Court Sides with Qualcomm in $1Bn Antitrust Fine

Editorial
Last updated: March 10, 2025 9:45 am
Editorial
Published June 15, 2022
Share

U.S. chipmaker Qualcomm on Wednesday won its fight against a 997 million euro ($1.05 billion) fine imposed by EU antitrust regulators four years ago, dealing a major setback to EU antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager’s crackdown on Big Tech.

The European Commission in its 2018 decision said Qualcomm paid billions of dollars to Apple from 2011 to 2016 to use only its chips in all its iPhones and iPads in order to block out rivals such as Intel Corp.

Qualcomm’s fine is one of several imposed by Vestager on companies ranging from Alphabet unit Google to banks and truckmakers over anti-competitive practices. Apple, Amazon and Facebook are being investigated.

The General Court, Europe’s second-highest, annulled the EU finding and faulted the EU competition enforcer over the handling of the case.

“A number of procedural irregularities affected Qualcomm’s rights of defence and invalidate the Commission’s analysis of the conduct alleged against Qualcomm,” judges said.

“The Commission did not provide an analysis which makes it possible to support the findings that the payments concerned had actually reduced Apple’s incentives to switch to Qualcomm’s competitors in order to obtain supplies of LTE chipsets for certain iPad models to be launched in 2014 and 2015,” they said.

The EU competition enforcer can appeal on matters of law to the EU Court of Justice (CJEU), Europe’s highest court. The Commission said it would carefully study the judgement and its implications and consider its next steps.

“The high-level conclusion is that the Court is telling the Commission to be extremely cautious in pricing abuses,” said Assimakis Komninos, a partner at law firm White & Case.

“The Commission will now be very hesitant to start investigations into such cases unless they are really sure,” he said.

This is the second major defeat for Vestager who in January lost the court’s backing for a 1.06 billion euro fine on Intel 12 years ago for squeezing rival Advanced Micro Devices

You Might Also Like

Apple May Face New EU Antitrust Charges in Payments

Mexico Passes New Antitrust and Telecom Laws

$3.9 Billion Deal: DoorDash to Acquire Deliveroo

Italian Competition Authority Fines Shein €1 Million Over Misleading Environmental Claims

Samsung’s EU Cloud Gaming Push: Market Dynamics Ahead

TAGGED:102eu courteuropean commissionqualcommrebates

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Covestro’s 10% Drop: Merger Arbitrage Opportunity or Value Trap?

Editorial
Editorial
September 9, 2025
Zalando’s EU Court Loss Harmless; Real Threats Are Weak Demand, Shein and Temu
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?