Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Reading: Zuckerberg, Meta Executives Settle $8 Billion Privacy Lawsuit
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Zuckerberg, Meta Executives Settle $8 Billion Privacy Lawsuit

Editorial
Last updated: July 18, 2025 10:56 am
Editorial
Published July 18, 2025
Share
Photo by Dima Solomin on Unsplash

Mark Zuckerberg and other current and former Meta executives have reached a surprise settlement in a high-profile shareholder lawsuit seeking $8 billion in damages for alleged failures to protect Facebook users’ privacy. The deal abruptly ended a trial in Delaware’s Court of Chancery just as it was set to enter its second day, Reuters reported.

The case accused Zuckerberg, Meta board members including venture capitalist Marc Andreessen, and former COO Sheryl Sandberg of allowing repeated privacy violations that ultimately cost the company billions. Facebook was fined $5 billion by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in 2019 for breaching a 2012 consent decree to safeguard user data.

Plaintiffs alleged Meta’s leadership knowingly ignored legal obligations and enabled a system of mass data harvesting, citing scandals like the Cambridge Analytica breach. The suit aimed to make 11 individual defendants financially accountable for the resulting regulatory fallout and legal costs. Defendants denied wrongdoing and dismissed the claims as extreme.

Lawyers did not disclose settlement terms. Judge Kathaleen McCormick, who presided over the case, adjourned proceedings and congratulated the parties on the resolution. Zuckerberg and Sandberg were scheduled to testify later in the trial, which was expected to run through next week.

The lawsuit marked the first trial of so-called “Caremark” claims—a notoriously difficult type of case alleging directors failed to oversee company compliance. Even if shareholders had won, the case was likely to be appealed.

Observers noted the settlement avoids public testimony that could have further damaged Meta’s reputation. Critics, including Jason Kint of Digital Content Next, called it a “missed opportunity for public accountability.”

Meta, which was not a defendant in the case, declined to comment. The company maintains it has invested billions in improving privacy protections since 2019.

You Might Also Like

DOJ Antitrust Chief Targets Costly Consultants in Efficiency Push

Apple Challenges €1.8 Billion EU Antitrust Fine Over App Store Restrictions

Competition authorities monitoring food prices in Europe

BBVA’s Battle for Sabadell Enters Critical Phase as Antitrust Ruling Nears

ICE’s Target Black Knight Sells Unit to Ease Antitrust Concerns

TAGGED:facebookmetaprivacysettlementUSAZuckerberg

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Covestro’s 10% Drop: Merger Arbitrage Opportunity or Value Trap?

Editorial
Editorial
September 9, 2025
Zalando’s EU Court Loss Harmless; Real Threats Are Weak Demand, Shein and Temu
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?