Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Sign in
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • For Lawyers
    For Lawyers
    Want to know where markets are heading—and gain just enough financial insight to impress your clients? Ready to spot that one trend or idea that…
    Show More
    Latest News
    CMA Kicks Off Omnicom-IPG’s $25 Billion Deal Review, Eyeing Approval on August 13
    June 17, 2025
    Microsoft Could Repeat its Teams Strategy, this time with Bing and Edge 
    June 15, 2025
    Mexico’s Supreme Court Boosts Regulator’s Power to Collect Confidential Information
    June 12, 2025
    Why Antitrust Lawyers Should Read 10-K Reports
    June 11, 2025
  • For Investors
    For Investors
    Have you ever considered using Antitrust as an event-driven investing strategy? Now you can identify investment opportunities stemming from market studies, M&A, investigations and more
    Show More
    Latest News
    Cartel Decisions: An Untapped Antitrust Event-Driven Opportunity?
    June 16, 2025
    Corning’s Moat Keeps Investors Positive—EU Decision Could Add Upside
    June 17, 2025
    Telekom Slovenije Braces for Impact After Damage Claim Suit
    June 12, 2025
    BBVA-Sabadell Acquiring Market: Moat or Anticompetitive?
    June 12, 2025
  • News
    News
    Stay informed with our global antitrust news compilation—bringing you the latest developments, regulatory updates, and key cases from around the world, all in one place
    Show More
    Latest News
    Commission Accepts AliExpress Commitments and Advances Probe into Illegal Product Risks
    June 18, 2025
    Mexico’s IFT Fines Telcel and Oxxo $96 Million for Anticompetitive Practices in SIM Card Sales
    June 18, 2025
    Italy Launches Probe into AI Firm DeepSeek Over Misinformation Risks
    June 17, 2025
    Slovak Authority Raids Firms in Air Conditioning Sector
    June 17, 2025
  • Free
  • Memberships
Reading: Why Deliveroo and Just Eat Takeaway Got Acquisition Offers and Delivery Hero Didn’t
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Free
  • Memberships
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
delivery food rider
Investors

Why Deliveroo and Just Eat Takeaway Got Acquisition Offers and Delivery Hero Didn’t

Editorial
Last updated: June 2, 2025 11:51 am
Editorial
Published April 28, 2025
Share
Photo by Czapp Árpád: https://www.pexels.com/photo/man-in-yellow-raincoat-riding-bicycle-in-front-of-building-10373728/

Legal risks, growth concerns, and regulatory scrutiny could explain why investors are favoring Deliveroo and Just Eat Takeaway over Delivery Hero.

Contents
Delivery Hero’s Strategic PositionDelivery Hero’s Legal RisksAntitrust InvestigationWorker Reclassification and VAT RisksNote for InvestorsConclusion

The European food delivery sector is undergoing a transformation, and Delivery Hero’s legal problems could cost the company more than just fines. During the pandemic, the stock prices of major players such as Deliveroo, Delivery Hero, and Just Eat Takeaway soared, but they suffered sharp declines in order volumes once COVID-19 restrictions were lifted. This downturn also led these companies to post heavy losses for several consecutive years.

However, as we reported earlier this year, financial analysts have identified 2025 as a potential turning point for the sector. Recent financial statements suggest the worst may be over, with losses shrinking and some companies even returning to profitability. Deliveroo, for instance, reported an EBITDA of GBP 16 million, while Just Eat Takeaway also posted a positive EBITDA, although it continues to report a net loss.

With stock prices still relatively low and signs of recovery emerging, it was only a matter of time before larger companies began scouting for acquisition opportunities. In February, Prosus announced its acquisition of Just Eat Takeaway for €4.1 billion, a deal still subject to regulatory approval. And just last Friday, DoorDash made headlines with its €3.6 billion offer to acquire Deliveroo.

Delivery Hero’s Strategic Position

Delivery Hero, despite being objectively larger than Deliveroo and Just Eat Takeaway, may not appear as attractive to investors for several reasons. One concern is that, according to analysts, its projected revenue, EBITDA, and EPS growth are not expected to match the performance of its two rivals (see table below).

Source: investing.com

Another major factor is the antitrust risk. Delivery Hero operates in numerous European markets, and any acquisition by major players like DoorDash or Uber could trigger regulatory scrutiny in several jurisdictions, especially if the deal would significantly strengthen its market position. For instance, just last March, the Taiwanese regulator blocked Uber’s proposed acquisition of Delivery Hero’s Foodpanda unit on antitrust grounds.

However, other pending legal risks facing Delivery Hero may also have deterred potential buyers—not only because of the inherent risk, but also because these issues could give its competitors a strategic advantage.

Delivery Hero’s Legal Risks

The German company has disclosed several legal risks that could significantly impact its cash flow and impair revenue in the near future. Delivery Hero has set aside provisions totaling nearly €900 million to cover these risks. However, this figure represents an estimate before any liabilities are finalized, meaning the actual financial impact could ultimately be higher—or lower—than currently anticipated.

For context, Delivery Hero reported a net loss of €254 million last year, narrowing its losses by almost half compared to the previous year, but still falling short of achieving profitability. Furthermore, its levered free cash flow (FCF)—the amount available to pay dividends, fund acquisitions, or settle fines—stood at €499 million.

Antitrust Investigation

One of the most significant legal challenges Delivery Hero faces is an antitrust investigation. In July 2024, the European Commission opened a formal probe into Delivery Hero and Glovo, focusing on allegations of market allocation and the exchange of commercially sensitive information, such as strategies, prices, capacity, costs, and product characteristics.

Delivery Hero has estimated a potential fine of over €400 million in connection with this investigation and has increased its provision accordingly. While this move should prevent a direct immediate hit to the company’s balance sheet, the final amount could still affect its 2025 profit margins and, more critically, its cash flow. Interestingly, the company reclassified this provision from non-current to current liabilities, suggesting that a resolution could arrive within the next year.

Beyond the financial impact, Delivery Hero also faces the prospect of follow-on damage claims in Europe and, perhaps even more significantly, reputational damage. Both factors could put additional pressure on the company’s stock price.

Worker Reclassification and VAT Risks

A second major legal provision relates to the reclassification of workers and associated VAT liabilities. In Spain, Glovo had previously classified its riders as self-employed contractors, but regulatory actions forced the company to reclassify them as employees. Delivery Hero has set aside €492 million to cover potential fines, retroactive social security contributions, and unpaid VAT obligations.

This reclassification is expected to have a long-lasting negative impact on the company’s bottom line, affecting profitability for years to come.

Note for Investors

Delivery Hero’s legal provisions underscore the seriousness of the risks the company faces. It is worth noting that companies do not always set aside provisions for antitrust fines, particularly when they intend to appeal.

While the company recently changed its risk classification from “high” to “moderate,” this adjustment reflects reduced uncertainty regarding the size of the fine—not a lower probability of it being imposed.

The timing of any cash outflows will ultimately depend on the resolution of these proceedings. However, given Delivery Hero’s current levered free cash flow of €499 million and potential combined penalties totaling €892 million, the company faces a highly uncertain financial outlook for 2025.

Conclusion

While the broader European food delivery sector shows signs of recovery, Delivery Hero’s position is increasingly precarious. Slower projected growth, major unresolved legal risks, and financial strain could leave the company at a disadvantage compared to its peers. Investors should watch closely how these legal proceedings unfold over the coming months, as their outcome could significantly influence Delivery Hero’s strategic options and valuation.

Want more exclusive content? Sign up for our newsletter

You Might Also Like

Bondalti-Ercros’ Approval Likely Hinges on Divestitures

China’s SAMR Tightens Its Grip on M&A Notification, May Close VIE Gap

BBVA-Sabadell Acquiring Market: Moat or Anticompetitive?

Tariffs, Lawsuits, and a Cash Crunch: Stellantis’ Risk Pile-Up

€6 Million Fine for Price-Fixing in Audio Product Companies

TAGGED:dashdoordeliveroodelivery heroEditor's Pickgermanyjusteattakeawaymergeruk

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Corning’s Moat Keeps Investors Positive—EU Decision Could Add Upside

Editorial
Editorial
June 17, 2025
Telekom Slovenije Braces for Impact After Damage Claim Suit
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Mergers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About US
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?