Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Reading: US Judge Halts Microsoft-Activision Amidst FTC Challenge
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

US Judge Halts Microsoft-Activision Amidst FTC Challenge

Editorial
Last updated: March 10, 2025 9:45 am
Editorial
Published June 14, 2023
Share

In a significant setback for Microsoft’s ambitious $75 billion acquisition of Activision Blizzard, a US federal judge has temporarily blocked the deal in response to a request from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

microsoft
Photo by Turag Photography on Unsplash

The move comes as the FTC pursues a legal challenge against the acquisition, citing concerns about potential anticompetitive practices and a breach of US antitrust laws. The decision by the judge puts a hold on the closure of the gaming industry’s largest-ever deal and sets the stage for an evidentiary hearing next week.

Legal Proceedings and Judge’s Order

On Tuesday, June 13, a US district court judge in California issued an order prohibiting the completion of Microsoft’s acquisition of Activision Blizzard pending an evidentiary hearing scheduled for June 22-23. The FTC, which had previously filed a lawsuit against the deal, requested the court’s intervention to prevent the transaction from closing until the conclusion of its own in-house proceedings, set to begin in August. The judge’s temporary restraining order aims to maintain the status quo and enable the court to consider the FTC’s allegations and determine if a preliminary injunction is warranted.

FTC’s Allegations and Microsoft’s Response

The FTC’s complaint argues that if Microsoft gains control of Activision’s content, it would have the power to manipulate or restrict access to that content, thereby stifling competition in terms of product quality, pricing, and innovation. “Today we seek to stop Microsoft from gaining control over a leading independent game studio and using it to harm competition in multiple dynamic and fast-growing gaming markets.”The regulatory body expressed concerns over reports suggesting an imminent closure of the deal, prompting its decision to seek a federal court order. Microsoft, in response, emphasized the need to expedite the legal process, asserting that it would ultimately bring more choice and competition to the gaming market. The company expressed confidence in the court’s decision-making process and its commitment to complying with regulatory requirements.

Impact on the Biden Administration’s Antitrust Policies

The FTC’s challenge against the Microsoft-Activision deal represents a significant merger challenge under the current administration led by President Joe Biden. The administration has adopted a tough stance on anti-competitive practices, appointing progressive officials, including FTC Chair Lina Khan, who prioritize enforcing antitrust laws. This case highlights the administration’s commitment to ensuring fair competition and preventing consolidation that could harm consumers and market competition.

International Perspectives and Regulatory Actions

The UK’s Competition and Markets Authority dealt a severe blow to the deal in April by ordering its blockage. The authority raised concerns that Microsoft might make Activision’s games exclusive to its own cloud gaming service. In contrast, the European Union approved the deal in May after Microsoft made concessions, including allowing European consumers to stream Activision games on all cloud gaming providers for a decade. These diverging regulatory decisions underscore the challenges of navigating antitrust regulations across jurisdictions.

The temporary restraining order imposed by the US federal judge represents a significant obstacle for Microsoft’s acquisition of Activision Blizzard. The hearing next week will determine whether a preliminary injunction will be granted, effectively prolonging the legal battle. The outcome will shape the future of this high-profile deal, with potential repercussions for the gaming industry and the broader landscape of mergers and acquisitions. As the legal process unfolds, the case will continue to test the Biden administration’s commitment to promoting competition and ensuring a level playing field in the tech and gaming sectors.

You Might Also Like

Trump’s Picks for SEC and DOJ Signal a Shift in Crypto and Tech Regulation

Deadline Set for Interest in Seven & i and Couche-Tard U.S. Stores

UK Watchdog Warns of Higher Prices in Aramark–Entier Merger

Japan FTC Orders Google to Cease Android Search Service Practices

Azul-Gol Merger: Transforming Brazil’s Skies

TAGGED:acquisitionActivision Blizzardcompetitionftcgaming marketmicrosoftTech

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Zalando’s EU Court Loss Harmless; Real Threats Are Weak Demand, Shein and Temu

Editorial
Editorial
September 4, 2025
Covestro’s 10% Drop: Merger Arbitrage Opportunity or Value Trap?
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?