Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Sign in
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • For Lawyers
    For Lawyers
    Here, you’ll find the regulatory trends and hidden market shifts that others miss. You’ll learn where markets (and your clients’ industries) are heading—and how to…
    Show More
    Latest News
    Apple, Meta Refusal to Comply with EU rules May Bring New Fines, But Profits Too
    July 20, 2025
    Getty Images + Shutterstock: A Deal That Puts UK Regulator to the Test
    July 16, 2025
    Meta Bets Big on Smart Glasses, But Money is on Ads, Not Hardware
    July 15, 2025
    OpenAI–Google AI Browser War Exposes Limits of EU Tech Rules
    July 14, 2025
  • For Investors
    For Investors
    Regulatory events move markets—often faster than earnings reports. A merger approval or a hefty fine can send a stock soaring or sinking in a day.…
    Show More
    Latest News
    New EU rules targeting Shein and Temu Likely to Benefit Zalando
    July 18, 2025
    Symrise: How to benefit from a Cartel Investigation
    July 16, 2025
    Bank Pekao: On Its Way to lead Poland’s financial sector
    July 14, 2025
    Nexi: Solid Numbers With Regulatory Events as Catalysts
    July 14, 2025
  • News
    News
    Stay informed with our global antitrust news compilation—bringing you the latest developments, regulatory updates, and key cases from around the world, all in one place
    Show More
    Latest News
    Zuckerberg, Meta Executives Settle $8 Billion Privacy Lawsuit
    July 18, 2025
    Turkish Authority Opens Antitrust Probe into Mastercard and Visa
    July 18, 2025
    Malaysia Fines Three Contractors for Bid Rigging
    July 17, 2025
    EU to Launch Antitrust Probe into Universal’s Downtown Music Deal
    July 17, 2025
  • Why Join?
  • Memberships
Reading: UK Court Blocks Motorola’s Appeal, Upholds Price Cap
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Why Join?
  • Memberships
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

UK Court Blocks Motorola’s Appeal, Upholds Price Cap

Editorial
Last updated: March 10, 2025 9:45 am
Editorial
Published February 3, 2025
Share

The United Kingdom Court of Appeal has ruled against Motorola Solutions in a landmark competition law case, solidifying government-imposed price controls on the company’s Airwave TETRA network.

This ruling effectively denies Motorola’s efforts to overturn a charge control order established by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) and is expected to cost the company over $1 billion in projected revenue this decade.

Court Rejects Motorola’s Appeal

The Court of Appeal (CoA) unanimously dismissed Motorola Solutions’ application for permission to appeal the CMA’s findings. The CMA had previously determined that Motorola was earning “supernormal profits” by maintaining a monopoly over communications network services for UK emergency services. Given the lack of competition, the CMA imposed a price cap in July 2023, reducing the cost by nearly £200 million per year.

Motorola had initially challenged the CMA’s findings at the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT), which also ruled in favor of the CMA. Motorola then sought permission to appeal to the CoA, arguing that the CMA had erred in its competition assessment and in evaluating Airwave Network’s profitability in 2021. The CoA, however, rejected these claims and upheld the CMA’s reasoning, bringing the case to a definitive close.

Impact on UK Emergency Services and Taxpayers

The CMA’s price cap ensures that the UK’s emergency services pay fair market rates for Airwave services. According to CMA estimates, without the intervention, Motorola would have continued to charge emergency services approximately £200 million per year above competitive market levels. These inflated costs would ultimately have been borne by taxpayers.

George Lusty, Executive Director of Consumer Protection and Markets at the CMA, welcomed the decision, stating:

“Our investigation showed that Motorola had been charging emergency services in the UK £200 million a year more than they would if the market was working well. The Court’s judgment today means that our price cap remains in place, which limits how much Motorola can charge emergency services for using its Airwave Network.”

Motorola’s Response

Motorola Solutions expressed disappointment with the ruling but emphasized its commitment to providing high-quality, mission-critical communication services for UK emergency services. In a statement, the company said:

“While we continue to strongly disagree with the CMA’s unprecedented decision, we are focused on moving forward and continuing to deliver this world-class emergency communications service for the UK’s public-safety users.”

Background of the Investigation

The CMA launched its investigation into Motorola’s Airwave Network pricing in October 2021, citing concerns that the lack of competition was leading to excessive charges. Motorola had acquired the Airwave Network in 2016, shortly after securing a contract to develop the LTE-based Emergency Services Network (ESN). The ESN, originally intended to replace Airwave by 2019, has faced repeated delays and is now expected to be operational no earlier than 2029. As a result, UK emergency services remain dependent on Airwave, giving Motorola a dominant position in the market.

The CMA’s investigation revealed that Motorola’s Airwave revenues accounted for only 7% of its global income but contributed to approximately 21% of its global pre-tax profits. This led to the decision to impose price controls, effectively reducing Airwave’s projected revenue by more than 40% for the contract extension period from 2023 to 2029.

Legal and Financial Implications

The CoA ruling marks the final legal hurdle in this case, as Motorola has no further avenues to challenge the CMA’s decision. Lord Justice Nicholas Green, writing the unanimous opinion, acknowledged the significant financial impact on Motorola but found no basis for overturning the CMA’s findings:

“There is no proper basis upon which this Court can interfere. For all these reasons, I would refuse permission to appeal.”

This decision reinforces regulatory oversight in the telecommunications sector and ensures fair pricing in critical public service contracts. Moving forward, Motorola Solutions must operate within the established price cap, while the UK government continues its efforts to transition emergency services to the long-delayed ESN.

You Might Also Like

Mexico´s President Proposes New Antitrust Legislation

 eToro Europe fined 1.3 million euros in Italy

CMA Targets AWS and Microsoft: the Hidden Battle Over GenAI

Zalando Challenges EU Tech Regulations, Argues Distinction from Amazon and AliExpress

U.S. Judge Rules Google Illegally Monopolized Digital Ad Tech Market

TAGGED:CATcmacommunicacionsnetwork servicesMotorola solutionsUK Court of AppealUK emergency services

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Symrise: How to benefit from a Cartel Investigation

Editorial
Editorial
July 16, 2025
New EU rules targeting Shein and Temu Likely to Benefit Zalando
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?