Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Sign in
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • For Lawyers
    For Lawyers
    Want to know where markets are heading—and gain just enough financial insight to impress your clients? Ready to spot that one trend or idea that…
    Show More
    Latest News
    CMA Kicks Off Omnicom-IPG’s $25 Billion Deal Review, Eyeing Approval on August 13
    June 17, 2025
    Microsoft Could Repeat its Teams Strategy, this time with Bing and Edge 
    June 15, 2025
    Mexico’s Supreme Court Boosts Regulator’s Power to Collect Confidential Information
    June 12, 2025
    Why Antitrust Lawyers Should Read 10-K Reports
    June 11, 2025
  • For Investors
    For Investors
    Have you ever considered using Antitrust as an event-driven investing strategy? Now you can identify investment opportunities stemming from market studies, M&A, investigations and more
    Show More
    Latest News
    Cartel Decisions: An Untapped Antitrust Event-Driven Opportunity?
    June 16, 2025
    Corning’s Moat Keeps Investors Positive—EU Decision Could Add Upside
    June 17, 2025
    Telekom Slovenije Braces for Impact After Damage Claim Suit
    June 12, 2025
    BBVA-Sabadell Acquiring Market: Moat or Anticompetitive?
    June 12, 2025
  • News
    News
    Stay informed with our global antitrust news compilation—bringing you the latest developments, regulatory updates, and key cases from around the world, all in one place
    Show More
    Latest News
    Italy Launches Probe into AI Firm DeepSeek Over Misinformation Risks
    June 17, 2025
    Slovak Authority Raids Firms in Air Conditioning Sector
    June 17, 2025
    The CNMC Conducts New Inspections in the FBO Services Market at Spanish Airports
    June 16, 2025
    Telefónica Continues Strategic Exit from Latin America with Sale of Ecuador Unit to Millicom for €330 Million
    June 16, 2025
  • Free
  • Memberships
Reading: U.S. Judge Rules Google Illegally Monopolized Digital Ad Tech Market
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Free
  • Memberships
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

U.S. Judge Rules Google Illegally Monopolized Digital Ad Tech Market

Editorial
Last updated: April 17, 2025 4:48 pm
Editorial
Published April 17, 2025
Share
Photo by Salvino Fidacaro on Unsplash

A federal judge has ruled that Google unlawfully monopolized key segments of the online advertising technology market, marking a major victory for U.S. antitrust authorities and clearing the path for possible structural remedies, including a breakup of Google’s ad tech business.

In a decision issued by Judge Leonie Brinkema of the U.S. District Court in Alexandria, Virginia, the court found that Google violated Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act by tying its dominant publisher ad server (DoubleClick for Publishers, or DFP) with its ad exchange (AdX). The judge concluded that Google “willfully acquired and maintained monopoly power” in these two critical markets: publisher ad servers and ad exchanges.

While the ruling rejected the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) claim that Google held a monopoly in advertiser ad networks, it upheld core allegations that the company distorted competition in other parts of the ad tech ecosystem. The judgment allows the DOJ to move forward with remedies, potentially requiring Google to divest parts of its advertising technology stack—most notably its Google Ad Manager suite, which includes DFP and AdX.

The DOJ and a coalition of U.S. states argued that Google had engaged in anticompetitive conduct by acquiring rivals, restricting interoperability with competitors, and leveraging its position to favor its own services across the digital advertising supply chain. The case follows a three-week trial held in 2024.

Lee-Anne Mulholland, Google’s Vice President of Regulatory Affairs, stated that the company plans to appeal the decision. “We won half of this case and will appeal the other half,” she said. “We believe publishers choose Google because our ad tech tools are simple, affordable, and effective.”

Following the ruling, Google’s shares dropped by approximately 2.1% in midday trading.

The ruling sets the stage for a future court hearing to determine appropriate remedies. The DOJ has indicated that Google should be required to divest at least its ad server and exchange businesses to restore competitive conditions. A timeline for the next phase of proceedings has not yet been announced.

This case adds to Google’s growing regulatory challenges. Next week, a separate antitrust trial in Washington will address the DOJ’s request for the company to divest its Chrome browser and implement further changes to curb its dominance in online search.

Google previously considered selling its ad exchange business to satisfy concerns raised by European regulators, according to earlier reporting by Reuters.

You Might Also Like

Trump Administration Retains Biden-Era Merger Review Guidelines

BBVA’s Takeover Bid for Banco Sabadell to Undergo Public Consultation

Minor Fines to Three Retailer In Ireland For Misleading Discount Practices

Broadcom’s $61 Billion VMware Bid May Get EU approval, Sources

German Media Firm Hits Google with EU Complaint Over SEO Crackdown

TAGGED:Digital Ad Tech Marketgooglemonopolyonline advertising

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
This field is required.
This field is required.
This field is required.
This field is required.
Investors

Cartel Decisions: An Untapped Antitrust Event-Driven Opportunity?

Editorial
Editorial
June 18, 2025
BBVA-Sabadell Acquiring Market: Moat or Anticompetitive?
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Mergers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About US
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

This field is required.
This field is required.
This field is required.
This field is required.

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
This field is required.
This field is required.
This field is required.
This field is required.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?