Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Reading: U.S. Considers Sanctions on EU Officials Over Digital Services Act
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

U.S. Considers Sanctions on EU Officials Over Digital Services Act

Editorial
Last updated: August 29, 2025 10:47 am
Editorial
Published August 29, 2025
Share
https://www.freepik.com/free-photo/glitter-american-flag_2330160.htm#fromView=search&page=1&position=9&uuid=59d86551-f386-41a3-8673-aaf9f5955577&query=EU+and+USA+flags

The Trump administration is weighing whether to impose sanctions on European Union and member state officials responsible for implementing the bloc’s landmark Digital Services Act (DSA), according to two sources familiar with the matter. The potential punitive measures reflect U.S. concerns that the law suppresses freedom of expression and disproportionately burdens American technology companies.

Contents
U.S. Escalates Campaign Against DSAEU Defends Digital Services ActBroader Political TensionsIndustry PushbackOutlook

If enacted, the move would mark an unprecedented step, escalating tensions between Washington and Brussels at a time when transatlantic relations are already strained by tariff disputes and digital tax disagreements. The sanctions under consideration would likely take the form of visa restrictions, though no final decision has been made, the sources said, Reuters reported.

U.S. Escalates Campaign Against DSA

Internal meetings at the State Department last week explored possible targets for such measures, though it remains unclear which officials might be affected. The discussions come against the backdrop of President Donald Trump’s broader campaign against digital regulations abroad. Earlier this week, Trump threatened countries with “substantial additional tariffs” should they fail to repeal digital tax laws targeting U.S. companies.

According to an internal State Department cable previously reported by Reuters, Secretary of State Marco Rubio directed U.S. diplomats in Europe to lobby aggressively against the DSA in early August, urging engagement with EU governments and regulators to convey U.S. concerns. Rubio had already warned in May that visa bans could be applied to foreign officials accused of “censoring” Americans online.

EU Defends Digital Services Act

The European Commission has consistently rejected U.S. accusations of censorship, stressing that the DSA is designed to make online spaces safer. The law obliges large digital platforms to more actively remove illegal content, such as hate speech and child sexual abuse material, while safeguarding free expression.

“Freedom of expression is a fundamental right in the EU. It lies at the heart of the DSA,” an EU spokesperson said, dismissing Washington’s claims as “completely unfounded.”

Broader Political Tensions

The Trump administration’s posture reflects a shift from the traditional U.S. emphasis on democracy promotion toward a more transactional foreign policy, with selective advocacy for issues linked to conservative causes. Washington has increasingly criticized European governments for alleged suppression of right-wing voices, with senior officials including Vice President J.D. Vance accusing EU leaders of “censoring” Americans and backsliding on democratic values.

This confrontational approach has also included sanctions abroad. Earlier this year, the U.S. imposed measures on a Brazilian Supreme Court justice, accusing him of restricting the political speech of Trump ally and former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro.

Industry Pushback

Major U.S. technology companies, including Meta Platforms, have also voiced strong opposition to the DSA, arguing that it imposes censorship on their platforms and creates costly compliance burdens. European regulators, however, maintain that the measure is essential to ensure accountability and protect citizens online.

Outlook

While it remains uncertain whether sanctions against EU officials will move forward, the prospect underscores the deepening rift between Washington and Brussels over digital governance. A decision to penalize European officials for implementing domestic legislation would mark a rare and provocative departure from established diplomatic practice, potentially triggering a broader trade and political confrontation between the U.S. and the EU.

You Might Also Like

How Can I Save an Anticompetitive Merger? Remedies!

Italian Competition Authority Fines Shein €1 Million Over Misleading Environmental Claims

Spanish Regulator Imposes Hefty Fines on Amazon and Apple

Alphabet in Advanced Talks to Acquire Wiz for Over $30 Billion

SGS Ends $30 Billion Merger Talks with Bureau Veritas

TAGGED:DSAEUsanctionsUSA

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Zalando’s EU Court Loss Harmless; Real Threats Are Weak Demand, Shein and Temu

Editorial
Editorial
September 4, 2025
Covestro’s 10% Drop: Merger Arbitrage Opportunity or Value Trap?
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?