Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • Antitrust Intelligence
  • Antitrust Club
  • Antitrust Investor
Reading: Sweden Reviews Contractual Terms Between Food Platforms and Restaurants
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • Antitrust Intelligence
  • Antitrust Club
  • Antitrust Investor
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Sweden Reviews Contractual Terms Between Food Platforms and Restaurants

Editorial
Last updated: October 20, 2025 11:48 am
Editorial
Published October 20, 2025
Share
Photo by Dan Burton on Unsplash

The Swedish Competition Authority (SCA) has published the results of a follow-up analysis on contractual terms used by digital food ordering platforms in agreements with affiliated restaurants. The study focuses on exclusivity arrangements and price parity conditions, which may influence competition in the market for online food delivery.

The analysis is primarily based on a survey conducted in December 2024, following up on a broader 2021 sector survey examining competition in digital platform markets. The 2021 platform study investigated restaurants’ use of digital food platforms, including the prevalence of exclusivity agreements, under which a restaurant is contractually obligated to partner with only one platform. The survey at that time indicated that around half of the restaurants connected to a platform operated exclusively through that platform. Many of these restaurants reported that they considered themselves bound by formal exclusivity agreements.

In recent years, concerns have emerged regarding price parity conditions, where a restaurant is contractually restricted from offering lower prices through channels other than the food platform. While the Finnish Competition Authority has investigated such practices, the 2021 Swedish platform study did not examine these conditions in detail.

To address this gap, the SCA conducted a follow-up survey in autumn 2024, targeting restaurants using the three largest platforms in Sweden — Foodora, Uber Eats, and Wolt. The survey asked whether restaurants used multiple platforms and whether their agreements included exclusivity or price parity clauses. Of the 3,766 restaurants contacted, 2,962 successfully received the survey, and 177 responses were submitted, corresponding to a 6 percent response rate.

The SCA noted that the limited response rate requires cautious interpretation of the results, but the survey provides updated insights into the prevalence of exclusivity and pricing restrictions in agreements between food platforms and restaurants. The findings will inform the authority’s ongoing monitoring and supervision of competition in the digital food delivery market.

You Might Also Like

CNMC Fines Endesa and Naturgy €1.2 Million for Missing Info on Bills

Amex GBT’s $570M Acquisition of CWT Clears UK Regulatory Hurdle, Faces US Challenge

Turkey opens antitrust investigation into Google over app store payment practices

Meta Faces Potential Daily Fines as EU Scrutinizes Pay-or-Consent Model

German FCO Launches Investigation into Fuel Wholesale Market Disruptions

TAGGED:digital food orderingfoodonlinerestaurantsSCASwedenterms

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Financial Analysis

CVS Group Rises 13% in One Month, Though the CMA Market Study Didn’t Help

Editorial
Editorial
October 16, 2025
Shares Fall 8% After CMA Decision — Getty–Shutterstock May Become a Buying Opportunity
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Insights
  • Financial Analysis
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?