Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Reading: Spanish Regulator Imposes Hefty Fines on Amazon and Apple
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Spanish Regulator Imposes Hefty Fines on Amazon and Apple

Editorial
Last updated: March 10, 2025 9:45 am
Editorial
Published July 21, 2023
Share
Screenshot

Spain’s antitrust watchdog, known as the CNMC, levied substantial fines on global tech giants Amazon and Apple.

The regulatory authority found evidence of collusive behavior between the two companies, specifically in relation to limiting the online sale of Apple devices and stifling competition in Spain’s electronic device market. The CNMC’s investigation revealed that the contracts signed between Amazon and Apple included anti-competitive clauses that hindered the operations of other retailers, leading to the imposition of fines totaling €194.1 million ($218.03 million). Both companies have the option to appeal the decision within a two-month window.

In 2018, Amazon was granted the status of an authorized Apple dealer through two contracts signed on October 31st. However, it became evident that these agreements contained clauses that harmed competition and disrupted the online market for electronic devices in Spain. The CNMC’s investigation brought to light how the collaboration between Amazon and Apple impacted the availability and pricing of Apple devices on Amazon’s platform. The actions of the two companies hindered other sellers’ access to the market, affecting over 90% of the existing retailers using Amazon to sell Apple products. Furthermore, Amazon limited the advertising capabilities of Apple’s competitors on its website, leading to a significant increase in the prices of Apple devices sold online in Spain.

 In response to the anti-competitive practices, the CNMC imposed significant fines on both Amazon and Apple. Apple was fined €143.6 million, while Amazon was ordered to pay €50.5 million. The CNMC justified the fines as a means of penalizing the companies for unjustified restrictions on competition in the Spanish market. The substantial penalties send a clear message that colluding to control and restrict competition will not be tolerated.

In an emailed statement to Reuters, Amazon’s spokesperson rejected the CNMC’s suggestion that the company benefited from excluding sellers from its marketplace. The spokesperson clarified that Amazon’s business model is dependent on the success of companies selling through their platform. Furthermore, the spokesperson argued that the deal had proven beneficial for Apple device buyers, leading to an increase in the number of discounts on iPads and iPhones.

“We reject the suggestion made by CNMC that Amazon benefits from excluding sellers from its market place, as our business model hinges precisely on the success of the companies selling through Amazon,” Amazon’s spokesman said in statement sent to Reuters.

Apple defended the collaboration with Amazon, stating that the agreement aimed to combat the sale of counterfeit devices online. The company pointed out that prior to the arrangement, it had incurred significant expenses and effort in issuing hundreds of thousands of ‘take-down’ notices to halt the sale of counterfeit products. The deal with Amazon was intended to address this issue more effectively.

Coincidentally, a case involving Amazon and Apple in Italy bore similarities to the one brought before the Spanish antitrust watchdog. However, in the Italian instance, the two companies faced initial fines of €200 million ($224.8 million) before the charges were eventually dropped. It remains to be seen how the appeal process and legal landscape in Spain will unfold.

You Might Also Like

Chile asks the TDLC to lift restrictions on the VTR–Metrópolis Intercom merger after 20 years

Facebook Offers Commitments in French Antitrust Probe

Microsoft Faces EU, French Antitrust Probes Over Teams, Bing

Leadership Shakeup at Paramount Global: CEO Steps Down Amidst Merger Turmoil

Portugal Opens In-Depth Investigation into Idealista’s Acquisition of Portal47

TAGGED:amazonantitrustapplecnmconline sale

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Zalando’s EU Court Loss Harmless; Real Threats Are Weak Demand, Shein and Temu

Editorial
Editorial
September 4, 2025
Covestro’s 10% Drop: Merger Arbitrage Opportunity or Value Trap?
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?