Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • Antitrust Intelligence
  • Antitrust Club
  • Antitrust Investor
Reading: Pfizer’s $25.5 Million Effexor XR Antitrust Settlement Marks Turning Point in Long-standing Legal Battle
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • Antitrust Intelligence
  • Antitrust Club
  • Antitrust Investor
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Pfizer’s $25.5 Million Effexor XR Antitrust Settlement Marks Turning Point in Long-standing Legal Battle

Editorial
Last updated: March 10, 2025 9:45 am
Editorial
Published April 30, 2024
Share
Photo by Pixabay: https://www.pexels.com/photo/20-mg-label-blister-pack-208512/

The Effexor XR Antitrust Litigation, centered around allegations of collusion between pharmaceutical giant Pfizer’s predecessor, Wyeth, and competitor Teva, has taken a significant turn with Pfizer’s agreement to a $25.5 million settlement.

This settlement aims to address claims of conspiring to delay the release of a more affordable generic version of the widely-used antidepressant Effexor XR. The recent agreement follows closely on the heels of a $39 million settlement disclosed earlier this month. Legal representatives for the plaintiffs have taken proactive steps by filing a motion seeking approval from a federal judge in New Jersey for the proposed settlement. Should the settlement gain judicial approval, it will primarily benefit a class of “indirect purchasers” who acquired Effexor XR through intermediaries rather than directly from Wyeth. Notably, the proposed allocation of settlement funds designates 78% to third-party payors, including insurance companies and employee health plans, with the remaining 22% earmarked for individual consumers. Plaintiffs’ attorneys stand to receive approximately $8.7 million, representing 34% of the total settlement amount. While Pfizer has not admitted wrongdoing, the company expressed in a statement that it views the settlement as equitable, reasonable, and the most expedient means to resolve the ongoing litigation. Lead attorney for the plaintiffs, James Cecchi, opted not to provide additional commentary on the matter. In addition to the recent $25.5 million settlement, a separate $39 million settlement, subject to judicial approval earlier this month, pertained to a distinct class of purchasers who acquired Effexor XR directly from Wyeth, including drug wholesalers. Should these settlements receive judicial approval, they would mark the culmination of over 12 years of legal disputes surrounding allegations that Wyeth’s collaboration with Teva violated U.S. antitrust laws. Notably, Teva remains excluded from the settlement agreements, indicating that legal proceedings against the company will continue unabated.

You Might Also Like

Italian Competition Authority Investigates Eni Plenitude for Alleged Unfair Commercial Practices

EU Regulators Drop Kingspan Probe

FTC Updates Endorsement Guides to Prevent Fake Reviews

DuckDuckGo CEO Criticizes Google Antitrust Remedies as Inadequate

EU To Open Office in Silicon Valley

TAGGED:antitrust litigationEffexorXRPfizerpharmasettlmentTeva

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Financial Analysis

Unicredit’s Results Show the Way for European Banking

Editorial
Editorial
October 27, 2025
Shares Fall 8% After CMA Decision — Getty–Shutterstock May Become a Buying Opportunity
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Insights
  • Financial Analysis
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?