Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • What We Offer
Reading: Musk Faces FTC Antitrust Review on Twitter Purchase and 9% Stake
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • What We Offer
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Musk Faces FTC Antitrust Review on Twitter Purchase and 9% Stake

Editorial
Last updated: March 10, 2025 9:45 am
Editorial
Published May 5, 2022
Share

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission is reviewing Elon Musk’s $44 billion Twitter Inc. takeover, a person familiar with the deal said, setting up a deadline in the next month for the agency to decide whether to conduct an in-depth review of the transaction, Bloomberg Reported

Under U.S. merger law, Musk is required to notify the FTC and the Justice Department of the transaction and wait at least 30 days before closing to allow an investigation into potential antitrust concerns. The FTC can ask for additional information, issuing what’s known as a second request, which would further delay closing. 

Antitrust experts don’t expect the deal to raise antitrust concerns. 

However, Open Markets -– the anti-monopoly non-profit group where Democratic FTC Chair Lina Khan got her start in antitrust –- has urged the agency to block the deal, arguing that it would give Musk too much control over free speech platforms. Musk also owns Starlink, a satellite-based internet provider operated by Space Exploration Technologies Corp., which is being used to provide internet to Ukraine.

 The FTC is separately probing whether Musk should have notified the agencies when he acquired a 9% stake in the company in March. The Tesla Chief Executive Officer didn’t file paperwork with the FTC, seeking to take advantage of an exemption in the law for voting securities acquired solely for investment purposes, the person said. 

The Information reported earlier on the FTC’s probe into Musk’s 9% stake.

The FTC generally doesn’t take action if it finds a notification failure was accidental. But the agency can seek fines of up to $43,792 per day if the failure was flagrant or occurs repeatedly. In December, for example, the FTC fined Clarence Werner, founder of trucking giant Werner Enterprises Inc., nearly $500,000 for failing to notify the agency about several stock purchases.  Capital One Financial Corporation CEO Richard Fairbank was also dinged by the FTC last year for $637,950 for failing to file.

You Might Also Like

Japan FTC Orders Google to Cease Android Search Service Practices

CMA Kicks Off Omnicom-IPG’s $25 Billion Deal Review, Eyeing Approval on August 13

France Fines Shein €40 Million for Misleading Discounts

Greece Probes Pet Food Market Over Competition Concerns

Google Under DOJ Scrutiny Over Character.AI Agreement

TAGGED:big techelon muskM&Amergerremediestwitter

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Microsoft, Google & Amazon Soar in the Cloud While Watchdogs Hit Snooze

Editorial
Editorial
August 3, 2025
Telefónica’s M&A Ambitions Meet Reality Check After Q2 Results
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?