Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Reading: Microsoft’s Acquisition of Inflection AI: What the CMA Found and What It Means
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Microsoft’s Acquisition of Inflection AI: What the CMA Found and What It Means

Editorial
Last updated: March 10, 2025 9:45 am
Editorial
Published September 4, 2024
Share

The UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has completed its investigation into Microsoft’s acquisition of assets from Inflection AI, Inc.

Contents
What Happened?Why Did the CMA Get Involved?How Might This Affect Competition?What’s Next?
microsoft
Source: turag-photography-1uQe5BIiH8w-unsplash.jpg

The CMA determined that while this deal falls under its merger control jurisdiction, it does not pose a significant threat to competition in the UK market. The main concern was whether this acquisition might reduce competition, particularly in consumer chatbots and foundation models (FMs).

What Happened?

On March 19, 2024, Microsoft announced that it had hired almost all of Inflection AI’s team, including its co-founders, Mustafa Suleyman and Karén Simonyan. Alongside this, Microsoft also made several agreements with Inflection AI, including a non-exclusive license to use its intellectual property. Together, these actions were referred to as the “Transaction” by the CMA.

Microsoft is a global leader in technology, heavily involved in artificial intelligence (AI), including developing foundation models and AI applications like chatbots. Inflection AI, before the acquisition, was also working on similar AI projects, including its chatbot called Pi. Due to these overlapping activities, the CMA reviewed the merger to ensure it wouldn’t remove a significant competitor from the market.

Why Did the CMA Get Involved?

The CMA’s main job is to protect competition for the benefit of consumers. It investigates mergers that might reduce competition. In this case, the CMA decided that the Microsoft-Inflection AI deal created what they call a “relevant merger situation,” which they needed to examine more closely. They based this decision on three key points:

  1. Combining Businesses: The CMA found that Microsoft acquired enough of Inflection AI’s assets, including its key team members, to be considered a business acquisition. This is crucial because these assets, especially the team’s expertise, are vital for developing FMs and chatbots.
  2. Market Share: The CMA determined that the combined share of Microsoft and Inflection AI in the UK chatbot market was over 25%, meeting the threshold for further scrutiny.
  3. Timing: The CMA made its decision within the legal deadline, which confirmed its authority to review the transaction.

How Might This Affect Competition?

The CMA focused on two main areas: consumer chatbots and foundation models.

  1. Consumer Chatbots: The CMA looked at whether the deal would reduce competition by removing a close competitor. They found that Inflection AI had only a small share of the UK market and was not seen as a major competitor to Microsoft’s chatbots, such as Copilot and ChatGPT. While Inflection’s products emphasized emotional intelligence (EQ), this was not enough to significantly challenge Microsoft or other players in the market.
  2. Foundation Models: Similarly, the CMA found that Inflection AI’s foundation model offerings were still in the early stages and did not pose a serious competitive threat to Microsoft or other established FM providers. Inflection’s plans to use its FM capabilities for enterprise customers were just beginning and didn’t have enough momentum to compete effectively.

What’s Next?

The CMA concluded that Microsoft’s acquisition of Inflection AI’s assets does not significantly reduce competition in the UK. Therefore, the transaction will not be referred for further investigation. Joel Bamford, the CMA’s executive director, stated that while the deal qualifies as a merger under UK law, it is unlikely to have a major impact on the consumer chatbot market.

This decision closes the CMA’s investigation, allowing Microsoft to move forward with integrating Inflection AI’s assets into its broader AI strategy. The findings highlight the CMA’s careful approach to balancing innovation with maintaining a competitive market.

You Might Also Like

U.S. Judge Orders Google to Share Search Data but Allows Chrome and Apple Deal to Continue

EU Court Adviser Backs €4.1 Billion Fine Against Google in Android Antitrust Case

Danone, Nestlé Risk Margin Erosion After CMA Baby Formula Report

Lack of Competition Affects Poorer Households the Most, CMA reports

Turkey Approves Uber’s Acquisition of Majority Stake in Trendyol Go

TAGGED:aibig techcmacompetitionmicrosoftuk

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Covestro’s 10% Drop: Merger Arbitrage Opportunity or Value Trap?

Editorial
Editorial
September 9, 2025
Zalando’s EU Court Loss Harmless; Real Threats Are Weak Demand, Shein and Temu
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?