Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Sign in
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • For Lawyers
    For Lawyers
    Here, you’ll find the regulatory trends and hidden market shifts that others miss. You’ll learn where markets (and your clients’ industries) are heading—and how to…
    Show More
    Latest News
    Apple, Meta Refusal to Comply with EU rules May Bring New Fines, But Profits Too
    July 20, 2025
    Getty Images + Shutterstock: A Deal That Puts UK Regulator to the Test
    July 16, 2025
    Meta Bets Big on Smart Glasses, But Money is on Ads, Not Hardware
    July 15, 2025
    OpenAI–Google AI Browser War Exposes Limits of EU Tech Rules
    July 14, 2025
  • For Investors
    For Investors
    Regulatory events move markets—often faster than earnings reports. A merger approval or a hefty fine can send a stock soaring or sinking in a day.…
    Show More
    Latest News
    New EU rules targeting Shein and Temu Likely to Benefit Zalando
    July 18, 2025
    Symrise: How to benefit from a Cartel Investigation
    July 16, 2025
    Bank Pekao: On Its Way to lead Poland’s financial sector
    July 14, 2025
    Nexi: Solid Numbers With Regulatory Events as Catalysts
    July 14, 2025
  • News
    News
    Stay informed with our global antitrust news compilation—bringing you the latest developments, regulatory updates, and key cases from around the world, all in one place
    Show More
    Latest News
    Zuckerberg, Meta Executives Settle $8 Billion Privacy Lawsuit
    July 18, 2025
    Turkish Authority Opens Antitrust Probe into Mastercard and Visa
    July 18, 2025
    Malaysia Fines Three Contractors for Bid Rigging
    July 17, 2025
    EU to Launch Antitrust Probe into Universal’s Downtown Music Deal
    July 17, 2025
  • Why Join?
  • Memberships
Reading: Live Nation’s Bid to Narrow DOJ Ticketmaster Case Denied by Federal Judge
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Why Join?
  • Memberships
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Live Nation’s Bid to Narrow DOJ Ticketmaster Case Denied by Federal Judge

Editorial
Last updated: March 14, 2025 10:09 am
Editorial
Published March 14, 2025
Share
Photo by picjumbo.com: https://www.pexels.com/photo/crowd-in-front-of-people-playing-musical-instrument-during-nighttime-196652/

A federal judge in New York has denied Live Nation Entertainment Inc.’s attempt to narrow the Justice Department’s antitrust case, which seeks to break off Ticketmaster Entertainment Inc. from Live Nation, Bloomberg reported.

Contents
DOJ’s Antitrust Case Against Live NationBroader Antitrust EffortsNext Steps in the Case

The companies merged more than 15 years ago, but the DOJ and multiple states now argue that Live Nation has unlawfully monopolized the live events industry.

US District Judge Arun Subramanian informed both parties in a hearing on Thursday that he was rejecting Live Nation’s motion to dismiss certain claims in the case. While Subramanian did not provide his reasoning at the hearing, he stated that his written order would be made public later on Thursday or Friday. Live Nation’s motion was not intended to dismiss the case entirely but to eliminate specific claims.

Neither the DOJ nor Live Nation provided immediate comments following the ruling. The hearing was also convened to address concerns raised by the DOJ regarding Live Nation’s alleged failure to submit documents according to the case’s schedule.

DOJ’s Antitrust Case Against Live Nation

The Justice Department, joined by around 30 states, filed suit against Live Nation last year, accusing the company of illegally monopolizing the live events industry. According to the lawsuit, Live Nation controls over 265 concert venues in North America and manages more than 400 musical artists. The complaint also alleges that the company holds at least 80% of major concert venue ticketing, giving it an overwhelming market dominance.

Live Nation has denied any wrongdoing and filed motions to dismiss parts of the case, including a claim arguing that the company has no legal duty to grant access to its concert venues to competitors. While motions to dismiss are common in antitrust litigation, they rarely succeed in government-initiated cases.

Broader Antitrust Efforts

The case against Live Nation is part of a broader push by the Justice Department’s antitrust division, which is also pursuing major monopolization cases against Alphabet Inc.’s Google, Apple Inc., and Visa Inc. The DOJ has intensified scrutiny of dominant market players, aiming to curb anticompetitive practices in various industries.

Live Nation and Ticketmaster have long been targets of both consumer complaints and government oversight. Their 2010 merger was approved under a settlement agreement that imposed certain conditions. However, the Justice Department argues that this settlement failed to prevent ongoing violations of antitrust laws, leading to the current lawsuit.

Next Steps in the Case

A trial is scheduled for March 2026. During the hearing, a DOJ attorney indicated that the government intends to hold an initial trial to determine whether Live Nation violated antitrust laws. If a violation is found, a separate proceeding will be held to determine appropriate remedies, which could include structural changes such as breaking up the company.

You Might Also Like

DOJ Launches Task Force to Cut Market-Restrictive Rules

ARGENTINA: La Nueva Competencia

BBVA Eyes Conditional Antitrust Approval for Sabadell’s Deal

EU Takes Action on Safer and Fairer E-Commerce

DG Competition Probes Amazon’s $1.7 Billion iRobot Deal

TAGGED:antitrustDOJLive NationTicketmasterUSA

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Symrise: How to benefit from a Cartel Investigation

Editorial
Editorial
July 16, 2025
New EU rules targeting Shein and Temu Likely to Benefit Zalando
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?