Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Sign in
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • For Lawyers
    For Lawyers
    Here, you’ll find the regulatory trends and hidden market shifts that others miss. You’ll learn where markets (and your clients’ industries) are heading—and how to…
    Show More
    Latest News
    Apple, Meta Refusal to Comply with EU rules May Bring New Fines, But Profits Too
    July 20, 2025
    Getty Images + Shutterstock: A Deal That Puts UK Regulator to the Test
    July 16, 2025
    Meta Bets Big on Smart Glasses, But Money is on Ads, Not Hardware
    July 15, 2025
    OpenAI–Google AI Browser War Exposes Limits of EU Tech Rules
    July 14, 2025
  • For Investors
    For Investors
    Regulatory events move markets—often faster than earnings reports. A merger approval or a hefty fine can send a stock soaring or sinking in a day.…
    Show More
    Latest News
    New EU rules targeting Shein and Temu Likely to Benefit Zalando
    July 18, 2025
    Symrise: How to benefit from a Cartel Investigation
    July 16, 2025
    Bank Pekao: On Its Way to lead Poland’s financial sector
    July 14, 2025
    Nexi: Solid Numbers With Regulatory Events as Catalysts
    July 14, 2025
  • News
    News
    Stay informed with our global antitrust news compilation—bringing you the latest developments, regulatory updates, and key cases from around the world, all in one place
    Show More
    Latest News
    EU Launches Legal Action Against Spain Over Bank Merger Rules
    July 21, 2025
    Zuckerberg, Meta Executives Settle $8 Billion Privacy Lawsuit
    July 18, 2025
    Turkish Authority Opens Antitrust Probe into Mastercard and Visa
    July 18, 2025
    Malaysia Fines Three Contractors for Bid Rigging
    July 17, 2025
  • Why Join?
  • Memberships
Reading: IOC’s Ticketing Policies Face EU Antitrust Challenge from German Marketplace
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Why Join?
  • Memberships
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

IOC’s Ticketing Policies Face EU Antitrust Challenge from German Marketplace

Editorial
Last updated: April 1, 2025 7:09 am
Editorial
Published April 1, 2025
Share
Photo by Nathan Cima: https://www.pexels.com/photo/olympic-rings-monument-in-paris-france-31376813/

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) is facing an antitrust complaint filed with the European Union’s competition regulators by German online ticket marketplace Ticombo.

The complaint alleges that the IOC’s ticketing policies, which restrict ticket resale to its own exclusive platform, are anticompetitive and detrimental to consumer choice.

Ticombo contends that the IOC maintains an exclusive monopoly over the resale of tickets for major sporting events, including the upcoming Paris 2024 Olympic Games and the Milano-Cortina 2026 Winter Olympics. The company argues that by prohibiting independent resale platforms, the IOC is limiting competition and restricting access to the secondary ticketing market, Reuters reported

“By restricting independent resale platforms, the IOC not only limits consumer choice but also undermines the natural balance of the market,” Ticombo stated. The company further criticized the IOC’s resale system, which requires tickets to be resold exclusively through its official platform under strict conditions. These conditions mandate that tickets be sold at face value plus a platform fee, even in cases where demand is low, thereby preventing market-driven pricing adjustments.

The complaint is part of a broader trend in which companies and athletes have increasingly turned to the European Commission with concerns about the power wielded by sports-governing bodies. In recent years, allegations of dominance abuse have become more frequent, with claimants asserting that such practices violate EU competition law.

This case is expected to add to the ongoing scrutiny of the IOC’s commercial practices, particularly in relation to ticket sales and distribution. If the European Commission decides to investigate the complaint, it could lead to changes in the regulatory framework governing ticketing practices for major sporting events within the EU. The outcome of this challenge may have broader implications for the sports industry, potentially setting a precedent for how ticketing policies are structured and enforced in the future.

You Might Also Like

Brazilian CADE Issues Interim Measure Against Apple Amid Antitrust Investigation

Independent Porsche Parts Reseller Files Antitrust Claim Against Porsche UK Entities

China’s Antitrust Probe into Google: A New Trade Battle

CMA Targets AWS and Microsoft: the Hidden Battle Over GenAI

Brazilian Probes Alleged Cartel in Anesthesiology Sector of the Federal District

TAGGED:antitrustEUIOCmonopolyonline ticket marketplaceticketing policiesTicombo

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

New EU rules targeting Shein and Temu Likely to Benefit Zalando

Editorial
Editorial
July 18, 2025
Symrise: How to benefit from a Cartel Investigation
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?