Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Reading: IOC’s Ticketing Policies Face EU Antitrust Challenge from German Marketplace
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

IOC’s Ticketing Policies Face EU Antitrust Challenge from German Marketplace

Editorial
Last updated: April 1, 2025 7:09 am
Editorial
Published April 1, 2025
Share
Photo by Nathan Cima: https://www.pexels.com/photo/olympic-rings-monument-in-paris-france-31376813/

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) is facing an antitrust complaint filed with the European Union’s competition regulators by German online ticket marketplace Ticombo.

The complaint alleges that the IOC’s ticketing policies, which restrict ticket resale to its own exclusive platform, are anticompetitive and detrimental to consumer choice.

Ticombo contends that the IOC maintains an exclusive monopoly over the resale of tickets for major sporting events, including the upcoming Paris 2024 Olympic Games and the Milano-Cortina 2026 Winter Olympics. The company argues that by prohibiting independent resale platforms, the IOC is limiting competition and restricting access to the secondary ticketing market, Reuters reported

“By restricting independent resale platforms, the IOC not only limits consumer choice but also undermines the natural balance of the market,” Ticombo stated. The company further criticized the IOC’s resale system, which requires tickets to be resold exclusively through its official platform under strict conditions. These conditions mandate that tickets be sold at face value plus a platform fee, even in cases where demand is low, thereby preventing market-driven pricing adjustments.

The complaint is part of a broader trend in which companies and athletes have increasingly turned to the European Commission with concerns about the power wielded by sports-governing bodies. In recent years, allegations of dominance abuse have become more frequent, with claimants asserting that such practices violate EU competition law.

This case is expected to add to the ongoing scrutiny of the IOC’s commercial practices, particularly in relation to ticket sales and distribution. If the European Commission decides to investigate the complaint, it could lead to changes in the regulatory framework governing ticketing practices for major sporting events within the EU. The outcome of this challenge may have broader implications for the sports industry, potentially setting a precedent for how ticketing policies are structured and enforced in the future.

You Might Also Like

New EU Guidelines Revise When Competitors Can Cooperate

Telefónica Sells Bankrupt Peruvian Unit to Integra Tec

EU to Expand Foreign Subsidy Probes Amid China Tensions

EU Fines Car Manufacturers and ACEA €458 Million for Recycling Cartel

Federal Judge Allows FTC’s Antitrust Lawsuit Against Amazon to Proceed, Dismisses Some State Claims

TAGGED:antitrustEUIOCmonopolyonline ticket marketplaceticketing policiesTicombo

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Zalando’s EU Court Loss Harmless; Real Threats Are Weak Demand, Shein and Temu

Editorial
Editorial
September 4, 2025
Covestro’s 10% Drop: Merger Arbitrage Opportunity or Value Trap?
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?