Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • Antitrust Intelligence
  • Antitrust Club
  • Antitrust Investor
Reading: Hungary Penalizes Paradox and Distributor in Security Market Case
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • Antitrust Intelligence
  • Antitrust Club
  • Antitrust Investor
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Hungary Penalizes Paradox and Distributor in Security Market Case

Editorial
Last updated: October 14, 2025 1:47 pm
Editorial
Published October 14, 2025
Share
https://www.freepik.com/free-photo/closeup-hand-man-using-keypad-arm-his-home-alarm-system_29243086.htm#fromView=search&page=1&position=0&uuid=4f2b2778-30e8-481a-9dc3-dab1d62b3bd1&query=house+alarm+keypad

The Hungarian Competition Authority (GVH) has imposed a total fine of HUF 365.5 million (around €931,000) on the Bahamian-based security technology company Paradox Security Systems and its Hungarian distributor, following repeated proceedings ordered by the administrative court.

The GVH found that the companies had restricted competition among security technology equipment sellers on the Hungarian market for nearly ten years, while also limiting trade between European Union Member States.

The original investigation, concluded at the end of 2019, revealed that Paradox Security Systems Bahamas Ltd. (Paradox Bahamas) and its Hungarian distributors, Power Biztonzástechnikai Kereskedelmi Kft. (Power) and Trióda Biztonzástechnika Zrt. (Trióda), had engaged in several anti-competitive practices. These included prohibiting the sale of Paradox products abroad through a passive export ban, setting minimum installer margins that indirectly fixed resale prices, and restricting online sales by prohibiting the publication of end-user prices.

In the original proceedings, Trióda admitted the infringement, made a settlement statement, and did not seek legal remedy. However, Paradox Bahamas and Power challenged the GVH decision in court. The administrative court annulled the original ruling, citing concerns regarding the definition of the market and the justification of cross-border trade effects, and ordered a repetition of the proceedings.

In the repeated proceedings, the GVH reaffirmed the original findings based on distribution contracts, market conduct, and evidence collected during inspections. The Authority concluded that the companies’ practices allowed resellers and installers to achieve higher margins, which were ultimately passed on to consumers. These higher margins also incentivized resellers and installers to recommend Paradox products over competitors, further limiting consumer choice and competition in the Hungarian market.

As a result of these violations, the Competition Council imposed fines of HUF 268 million (€683,400) on Paradox Bahamas and HUF 97.5 million (€248,625) on Power. The lower fine for Power reflected its status as a small or medium-sized enterprise, its cooperation during the proceedings, admission of the infringement, and commitment to implement a mandatory compliance program.

You Might Also Like

Romania Clears Vodafone’s Takeover of Telekom Mobile with Conditions

Brazil’s Antitrust Authority Recommends Sanctions Against Apple

Germany Deals a Blow to Apple: Stricter Oversight Ahead

China’s Antitrust Probe into Google: A New Trade Battle

Publicis Groupe Acquires Lotame to Strengthen Identity-Driven Marketing Capabilities

TAGGED:fineHungaryParadoxPowersecurity marketsecurity technology

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Insights
  • Financial Analysis
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?