Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Reading: Google’s Ad Tech Suit Sent Back to Texas Federal Court
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Google’s Ad Tech Suit Sent Back to Texas Federal Court

Editorial
Last updated: March 10, 2025 9:45 am
Editorial
Published June 6, 2023
Share

The antitrust litigation against Alphabet Inc.’s Google, filed by state attorneys general, has taken a significant turn as a judicial panel transferred the case back to a federal court in Texas. The move to Texas has the potential to expedite the litigation process, which had been progressing slowly in other jurisdictions.

Photo by <a href="https://unsplash.com/es/@pawel_czerwinski?utm_source=unsplash&utm_medium=referral&utm_content=creditCopyText">Pawel Czerwinski</a> on <a href="https://unsplash.com/images/a
Photo by Pawel Czerwinski on Unsplash

In 2020, a group of state attorneys general, led by Texas, filed an antitrust lawsuit against Google, accusing the company of illegally monopolizing the advertising technology market. Initially filed in Texas federal court, Google successfully requested the case to be transferred to New York, where related class actions were pending. However, dissatisfaction with the slow pace of proceedings in New York prompted the state attorneys general to petition for the case’s return to Texas.

Transfer to Texas Federal Court

The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, in response to the state attorneys general’s request, ruled in favor of transferring the antitrust litigation back to Texas. This decision was facilitated by a law passed by Congress in December, which granted state attorneys general the authority to choose the venue for their federal antitrust suits. While the retroactivity provision was removed from the legislation, the judicial panel determined that the law still applied to pending state antitrust enforcement actions. Google had contested the transfer, citing duplicative proceedings and the removal of the retroactivity provision, but their objections were overruled.

Potential Implications

The transfer of the case to Texas holds potential benefits for the state attorneys general. The eastern district of Texas, known for its efficient handling of cases, boasts a reputation as a “rocket docket” with expedited hearings and timely decisions. This shift could significantly accelerate the litigation process, providing a favorable environment for the state attorneys general seeking resolution. On the other hand, Google may face added challenges as the Texas lawsuit alleges the company violated the law by exerting dominance over the online advertising process, resulting in reduced revenues for website publishers.

Broader Legal Battle and Global Antitrust Scrutiny

The antitrust lawsuit in Texas is just one facet of Google’s ongoing legal battles. The company faces multiple antitrust lawsuits globally, with allegations centered around abuse of dominance in various aspects of its business. Within the United States, Google is also contending with two federal government antitrust lawsuits—one focused on dominance in search and the other on dominance in advertising technology. Additionally, states led by Utah filed a lawsuit in 2021, claiming Google violated antitrust laws in its handling of the Play Store.

The transfer of the antitrust lawsuit against Google’s advertising technology business back to a federal court in Texas marks a significant development in the legal battle between state attorneys general and the tech giant. The enforcement of the Venue Act, coupled with the reputation of the eastern district of Texas for expediting cases, may lead to a swifter resolution. As Google continues to face mounting legal challenges, both domestically and internationally, the outcome of these lawsuits will have far-reaching implications for the company and the broader landscape of antitrust enforcement in the tech industry.

You Might Also Like

ING Group Eyes Expansion in Major European Markets While Finalizing Russia Exit

Brazilian CADE and Labor Prosecutor Sign Pact to Tackle Cartels and Labor Violations

Trump’s Picks for SEC and DOJ Signal a Shift in Crypto and Tech Regulation

Holcim Expands Latin American Presence

EU Antitrust Regulators to Deliver Verdict on Novo Holdings’ Catalent Acquisition by December 6

TAGGED:antitrustgooglelawsuitregulationtechnology

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Covestro’s 10% Drop: Merger Arbitrage Opportunity or Value Trap?

Editorial
Editorial
September 9, 2025
Zalando’s EU Court Loss Harmless; Real Threats Are Weak Demand, Shein and Temu
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?