Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What we do?
  • Insights
  • Financial Analysis
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
  • Antitrust Investor
Reading: Google and Epic Propose Settlement to End Play Store Antitrust Clash
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What we do?
  • Insights
  • Financial Analysis
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
  • Antitrust Investor
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Google and Epic Propose Settlement to End Play Store Antitrust Clash

Editorial
Last updated: November 5, 2025 11:03 am
Editorial
Published November 5, 2025
Share
Photo by appshunter.io on Unsplash

After five years of litigation, Google and Epic Games appear poised to end their long-running dispute over the Play Store’s business model. The two companies have jointly filed a proposed settlement in U.S. federal court that, if approved, would change how Android apps are distributed and monetized in the United States, Reuters reported.

The proposal centers on expanding developer and consumer choice. Google has agreed to allow broader options for app distribution outside of the Play Store and to enable third-party and web-based payment systems within apps—key issues that sparked the original lawsuit in 2020, when Epic’s Fortnite was removed for bypassing Google’s in-app billing system. In addition, Google would lower the maximum service fees it can charge developers to either 9% or 20%, depending on the transaction type.

Sameer Samat, Google’s President of Android Ecosystem, stated that the changes “focus on expanding developer choice and flexibility, lowering fees, and encouraging more competition — all while keeping users safe.” Epic CEO Tim Sweeney praised the agreement as a “comprehensive solution” that reaffirms Android’s “original vision as an open platform,” drawing a contrast to Apple’s closed model that blocks competing app stores.

If approved by U.S. District Judge James Donato, the proposal would resolve not only Epic’s 2020 lawsuit against Google but also related actions involving Samsung. It would mark one of the most significant settlements in the app ecosystem’s antitrust history—potentially redefining how digital marketplaces operate and setting a new precedent for platform openness and developer autonomy in the mobile economy.

You Might Also Like

EU Clears Vivendi’s Acquisition of Lagardère with Conditions

AI and Competition: Indian CCI Calls for Forward-Looking Regulatory Approach

Czech Authority Launches Sector Inquiry into Mobile Telecommunications Market

Italian Competition Authority Revises FIGC’s Apprenticeship Contract Rules

Spain Fines Mémora for Breach of Merger Commitments

TAGGED:antitrustepic gamesgooglemonopolyplay storesettlement

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Financial Analysis

The App Store Is Apple’s Profit Engine — and Its Most Guarded Secret

Editorial
Editorial
November 5, 2025
Financial Headwinds Temper Telefónica’s Consolidation Agenda
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Insights
  • Financial Analysis
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?