Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Reading: Fiat-Peugeot’s Remedies Bring EU Nod Closer But Not A Done Deal
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
Lawyers

Fiat-Peugeot’s Remedies Bring EU Nod Closer But Not A Done Deal

Editorial
Last updated: March 10, 2025 9:46 am
Editorial
Published September 30, 2020
Share

Rationale of the Deal

Fiat Chrysler and Peugeot agreed on an all-stock cross border merger that will create the world’s 4 largest automaker. Fiat had the upper hand in the negotiations as Peugeot needed the merger more than the Italo-american automaker. The French group needs to boost scale as a hedge against a reliance on EU sales and the pressure to comply with emission rules that can carry on hefty fines. For Fiat, this deal represents an opportunity to add electric vehicles (EVs) to its fleet as this segment is set to grow exponentially in the coming years.

Contents
Rationale of the Deal90% Chances of approvalAutomakers to Avoid DivestituresDeadline Suspended, Decision Likely in 1Q21

90% Chances of approval

The companies are likely to get the EU antitrust approval after the submission of remedies, although they still may need to beef up the remedy package. According to the European Commission, the companies’ overlap in light commercial vehicles (vans) raised anticompetitive concerns. This segment was important before the pandemic and it became even more important after a recent surge in demand for home-deliveries. Overlaps in small cars and SUVs didn’t raise any concern despite high combined market shares in some European countries.

Automakers to Avoid Divestitures

Fiat and Peugeot are offering to deepen its current agreement with Toyota to produce more vans for the Japanese firm in order to avoid selling one of their factories in France or Spain. While this type of behavioural remedies wouldn’t have been enough pre-Covid19 to address a horizontal overlap in a heavy industry, regulators this time may be poised to accept it given the uncertain outlook that automakers face in the coming years. Yet, if regulators were to accept a remedy plan without including a divestiture, they may request the parties to offer other commitments.

Deadline Suspended, Decision Likely in 1Q21

The companies may need to wait until early next year to get an approval. The statutory deadline is currently suspended since July until the parties submit the data requested. After more than two months suspended, the new deadline would probably be pushed back to January. Additionally, the proposed remedy could extend the deadline 15 working days, moving the final deadline probably to February. There is still a chance that the companies get an approval by year-end as regulators have enough time to test the remedies in the market and reach a decision but this seems unlikely.

You Might Also Like

EU Clears Vivendi’s Acquisition of Lagardère with Conditions

U.S.-China Tensions Delay Bunge’s $8.2 Billion Viterra Acquisition

Teresa Ribera Missed the Shot, AI Cartels, Food Pricing: Day 2 of the ICN

Telefónica’s M&A Ambitions Meet Reality Check After Q2 Results

Mexico’s Supreme Court Boosts Regulator’s Power to Collect Confidential Information

TAGGED:automakersdivestituresEVfiatmazdamergerpsaremediestoyota

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Zalando’s EU Court Loss Harmless; Real Threats Are Weak Demand, Shein and Temu

Editorial
Editorial
September 4, 2025
Covestro’s 10% Drop: Merger Arbitrage Opportunity or Value Trap?
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?