Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Sign in
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • For Lawyers
    For Lawyers
    Here, you’ll find the regulatory trends and hidden market shifts that others miss. You’ll learn where markets (and your clients’ industries) are heading—and how to…
    Show More
    Latest News
    Apple, Meta Refusal to Comply with EU rules May Bring New Fines, But Profits Too
    July 20, 2025
    Getty Images + Shutterstock: A Deal That Puts UK Regulator to the Test
    July 16, 2025
    Meta Bets Big on Smart Glasses, But Money is on Ads, Not Hardware
    July 15, 2025
    OpenAI–Google AI Browser War Exposes Limits of EU Tech Rules
    July 14, 2025
  • For Investors
    For Investors
    Regulatory events move markets—often faster than earnings reports. A merger approval or a hefty fine can send a stock soaring or sinking in a day.…
    Show More
    Latest News
    New EU rules targeting Shein and Temu Likely to Benefit Zalando
    July 18, 2025
    Symrise: How to benefit from a Cartel Investigation
    July 16, 2025
    Bank Pekao: On Its Way to lead Poland’s financial sector
    July 14, 2025
    Nexi: Solid Numbers With Regulatory Events as Catalysts
    July 14, 2025
  • News
    News
    Stay informed with our global antitrust news compilation—bringing you the latest developments, regulatory updates, and key cases from around the world, all in one place
    Show More
    Latest News
    CNMC Clears Esseco’s Takeover of Ercros with Conditions
    July 21, 2025
    EU Launches Legal Action Against Spain Over Bank Merger Rules
    July 21, 2025
    Zuckerberg, Meta Executives Settle $8 Billion Privacy Lawsuit
    July 18, 2025
    Turkish Authority Opens Antitrust Probe into Mastercard and Visa
    July 18, 2025
  • Why Join?
  • Memberships
Reading: Fiat-Peugeot’s Remedies Bring EU Nod Closer But Not A Done Deal
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Why Join?
  • Memberships
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
Lawyers

Fiat-Peugeot’s Remedies Bring EU Nod Closer But Not A Done Deal

Editorial
Last updated: March 10, 2025 9:46 am
Editorial
Published September 30, 2020
Share

Rationale of the Deal

Fiat Chrysler and Peugeot agreed on an all-stock cross border merger that will create the world’s 4 largest automaker. Fiat had the upper hand in the negotiations as Peugeot needed the merger more than the Italo-american automaker. The French group needs to boost scale as a hedge against a reliance on EU sales and the pressure to comply with emission rules that can carry on hefty fines. For Fiat, this deal represents an opportunity to add electric vehicles (EVs) to its fleet as this segment is set to grow exponentially in the coming years.

Contents
Rationale of the Deal90% Chances of approvalAutomakers to Avoid DivestituresDeadline Suspended, Decision Likely in 1Q21

90% Chances of approval

The companies are likely to get the EU antitrust approval after the submission of remedies, although they still may need to beef up the remedy package. According to the European Commission, the companies’ overlap in light commercial vehicles (vans) raised anticompetitive concerns. This segment was important before the pandemic and it became even more important after a recent surge in demand for home-deliveries. Overlaps in small cars and SUVs didn’t raise any concern despite high combined market shares in some European countries.

Automakers to Avoid Divestitures

Fiat and Peugeot are offering to deepen its current agreement with Toyota to produce more vans for the Japanese firm in order to avoid selling one of their factories in France or Spain. While this type of behavioural remedies wouldn’t have been enough pre-Covid19 to address a horizontal overlap in a heavy industry, regulators this time may be poised to accept it given the uncertain outlook that automakers face in the coming years. Yet, if regulators were to accept a remedy plan without including a divestiture, they may request the parties to offer other commitments.

Deadline Suspended, Decision Likely in 1Q21

The companies may need to wait until early next year to get an approval. The statutory deadline is currently suspended since July until the parties submit the data requested. After more than two months suspended, the new deadline would probably be pushed back to January. Additionally, the proposed remedy could extend the deadline 15 working days, moving the final deadline probably to February. There is still a chance that the companies get an approval by year-end as regulators have enough time to test the remedies in the market and reach a decision but this seems unlikely.

You Might Also Like

Bristol’s $74 Billion Celgene M&A Likely Gains Quick EU Approval

Ford, Stellantis, VW Avoid Major UK Cartel Risk But One Still Looms (Part 1)

Argentina Suspends Telecom Merger Over Market Concerns

Meta Bets Big on Smart Glasses, But Money is on Ads, Not Hardware

OpenAI–Google AI Browser War Exposes Limits of EU Tech Rules

TAGGED:automakersdivestituresEVfiatmazdamergerpsaremediestoyota

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Symrise: How to benefit from a Cartel Investigation

Editorial
Editorial
July 16, 2025
New EU rules targeting Shein and Temu Likely to Benefit Zalando
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?