Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Reading: FedEx, UPS, DHL Executives to Face Rare Cross-Examination in Indian Antitrust Case
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

FedEx, UPS, DHL Executives to Face Rare Cross-Examination in Indian Antitrust Case

Editorial
Last updated: August 14, 2025 9:54 am
Editorial
Published August 14, 2025
Share

Senior executives of FedEx, UPS, Aramex, and DHL in India will be cross-examined in the coming weeks by the Federation of Indian Publishers, which has accused the courier companies of price collusion. The move marks an uncommon development in an antitrust investigation that last year cleared the firms of wrongdoing, according to a Competition Commission of India (CCI) order reviewed by Reuters.

India’s courier and parcel delivery market — boosted by surging e-commerce — is projected to grow 11% annually, reaching $14.3 billion by 2030, according to Mordor Intelligence. The market’s rapid expansion has attracted both domestic and global players eager to secure a share.

The case began in 2022, when the publishers’ group alleged that the delivery companies coordinated on prices and discounts. In December 2024, Reuters reported that the CCI had found “no evidence” of commercial information sharing among the firms, relying largely on oral statements. Case details remain confidential under Indian law.

However, the Federation of Indian Publishers successfully argued that anomalies in executives’ statements were ignored during the investigation and that cross-examination was warranted. In a May 28 internal order, the CCI said the federation had “demonstrated sufficient cause establishing necessity and expediency” for such proceedings — a rarity in Indian competition enforcement.

Executives scheduled to be questioned include:Subhasish Chakraborty, Managing Director of DTDC Express; R.S. Subramanian, Managing Director of DHL Express India; Suvendu Choudhury, Vice President of FedEx India; Percy Avari, General Manager of Aramex India; and Abbas Panju, Managing Director of UPS Express India.

None of the executives responded to Reuters requests for comment. DHL stated it operates in “full compliance with all laws” and is cooperating fully with the CCI but declined to discuss specifics. FedEx, UPS, Aramex, DTDC, and the publishers’ federation also did not comment.

The Federation represents leading domestic publishers such as S. Chand and Rupa Publications, as well as international publishers including Pan Macmillan.

Allowing complainants to directly question company executives is highly unusual in India and could influence the outcome of the case.

“Such cross-examination may reveal new facts and the conclusions of the earlier investigation report may come into question,” said Gautam Shahi, partner at law firm Dua Associates.

The CCI’s investigations unit will supervise the proceedings and present a report to senior antitrust officials. Sources indicate that the process could delay the case by several months and introduce new legal and operational challenges for the courier industry.

The publishers allege the firms not only coordinated to set delivery charges but also failed to reduce fuel surcharges when jet fuel prices fell. A 202-page CCI investigation report, seen by Reuters, notes that 36 notices were sent to 15 courier companies in 2023–24, with UPS providing the highest number of responses. The report concludes no email correspondence was found indicating collusion or coordinated activities.

By securing the right to cross-examine, the publishers now intend to test the credibility of previous testimony and draw attention to inconsistencies they claim were overlooked.

You Might Also Like

Brazil Recommends Structural Remedies for Bimbo’s Acquisition of Wickbold

Safran Moves to Seal $1.8B Collins Deal with EU Concessions

TIM’s Antitrust Fine Reduced to EUR 87 Million Following Appeal

Broadcom’s $61 Billion VMware Bid May Get EU approval, Sources

Banco de Brasília Acquires Banco Master

TAGGED:antitrustCCIdeliverydhlexecutivesFedExIndiaUPS

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?