Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Reading: Federal Judge Allows FTC’s Antitrust Lawsuit Against Amazon to Proceed, Dismisses Some State Claims
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Federal Judge Allows FTC’s Antitrust Lawsuit Against Amazon to Proceed, Dismisses Some State Claims

Editorial
Last updated: March 10, 2025 9:45 am
Editorial
Published October 8, 2024
Share

In a major development for the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), a federal judge has ruled that the agency can move forward with its landmark antitrust lawsuit against Amazon.

Contents
Key Aspects of the LawsuitImplications for Amazon and the MarketplaceThe Broader Context: Antitrust Actions in Big TechWhat’s Next?
Photo by BoliviaInteligente on Unsplash

Filed in September 2023, this lawsuit accuses the retail giant of monopolistic practices that stifle competition, inflate prices, and harm both sellers and consumers. The ruling, delivered last week by Judge John H. Chun and unsealed on Monday, is a setback for Amazon, which has sought to have the case dismissed. However, the court did throw out some claims from individual states involved in the lawsuit.

Key Aspects of the Lawsuit

The FTC, alongside attorneys general from 18 states and Puerto Rico, alleges that Amazon abuses its dominant market position to control prices both on and off its platform. Specific accusations include overcharging sellers, suppressing competition, and forcing sellers to use Amazon’s fulfillment services for better product placement. The case is one of the most significant legal challenges in Amazon’s 30-year history and comes after years of investigation into the company’s business practices.

Despite the dismissal of a few claims from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Oklahoma, and Maryland—under their respective state antitrust and consumer protection laws—the majority of federal and state-level accusations will move forward. These include claims tied to the FTC Act and the Sherman Act, central pieces of U.S. antitrust law.

Implications for Amazon and the Marketplace

The ruling allows the FTC to continue its efforts to challenge Amazon’s market dominance, with the agency seeking to dismantle monopolistic controls and restore competition in the online marketplace. Doug Farrar, a spokesperson for the FTC, expressed optimism, stating, “The ways Amazon illegally maintains its monopolies and the harm they cause—including suppressed competition and higher prices for shoppers and sellers—will be on full display at trial.”

Amazon, on the other hand, remains defiant. In a statement, Tim Doyle, an Amazon spokesperson, stressed that the ruling is based on the assumption that all claims made in the FTC’s complaint are true. “They are not,” Doyle asserted, adding that the company believes the case will not hold up under scrutiny in court.

The Broader Context: Antitrust Actions in Big Tech

This lawsuit against Amazon is part of a broader movement by U.S. regulators to rein in the monopolistic power of major tech firms. The FTC is also pursuing legal action against Meta (formerly Facebook) for similar reasons, while the Department of Justice (DOJ) has filed antitrust lawsuits against Google and Apple. In a similar case, a federal judge ruled in August that Google’s search engine unfairly exploits its dominance, illustrating the growing momentum behind these antitrust efforts.

Should the FTC succeed, the consequences for Amazon could be profound. The company’s business model—centered on its control over pricing, marketplace policies, and fulfillment services—could be fundamentally altered, affecting both its relationship with third-party sellers and its influence over the broader e-commerce landscape.

What’s Next?

The trial is scheduled for October 2026, and both sides are preparing for what promises to be a complex and lengthy court battle. Judge Chun’s decision to allow the FTC’s claims to proceed is not a final ruling on the merits of the case, but it does set the stage for a critical legal confrontation. Chun noted that the FTC’s allegations are “plausibly” anticompetitive, meaning the agency has cleared the hurdle to present its evidence in court. At the same time, the judge acknowledged that Amazon’s arguments justifying its business practices will be considered at trial.

As the legal process unfolds, this case could serve as a precedent for future antitrust actions against other tech giants, shaping the future of competition law in the digital marketplace. The eventual outcome could have far-reaching implications not only for Amazon but for the entire tech industry and consumers alike.

In the meantime, Amazon will likely continue to defend its business practices aggressively, while the FTC will work to prove that the company’s alleged monopolistic behavior has harmed both sellers and shoppers. The stakes are high for both sides, as the outcome could significantly impact the way Amazon operates in the future.

You Might Also Like

EU Commission Opens In-Depth Probe into UMG’s Planned Acquisition of Downtown

Malaysia Fines Three Contractors for Bid Rigging

Hungary Launches Competition Supervision Proceeding Over Auchan’s Coupon Promotions

Italy Launches Probe into AI Firm DeepSeek Over Misinformation Risks

EU Launches Legal Action Against Spain Over Bank Merger Rules

TAGGED:amazonAnttrust Lawftclawsuit

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Covestro’s 10% Drop: Merger Arbitrage Opportunity or Value Trap?

Editorial
Editorial
September 9, 2025
Zalando’s EU Court Loss Harmless; Real Threats Are Weak Demand, Shein and Temu
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?