Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Reading: DG Competition Probes Amazon’s $1.7 Billion iRobot Deal
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

DG Competition Probes Amazon’s $1.7 Billion iRobot Deal

Editorial
Last updated: March 10, 2025 9:45 am
Editorial
Published July 7, 2023
Share

The European Commission has initiated an extensive antitrust investigation into Amazon’s proposed acquisition of iRobot, a leading smart vacuum manufacturer. 

Photo by Onur Binay on Unsplash

This move by the European Union (EU) comes after the United Kingdom’s antitrust regulator approved the acquisition, highlighting the divergent views on the potential impact of the deal. The investigation aims to evaluate whether the transaction would impede competition and further solidify Amazon’s position as a dominant online marketplace provider.

The European Commission’s Concerns

The European Commission announced on Thursday that it has launched an in-depth inquiry into Amazon’s planned acquisition of iRobot. One of the key concerns is the potential restriction of competition in the market for robot vacuum cleaners. The Commission worries that the deal could grant Amazon the ability to manipulate search results in favor of iRobot, disadvantaging competitors such as Shark and Dyson when marketing to Amazon’s vast user base.

“Amazon is both an online marketplace and a retailer. We are concerned that, by acquiring iRobot, Amazon may use such dual role to foreclose access by iRobot’s rivals to its marketplace. With our in-depth investigation, we will also investigate whether Amazon would use data collected by iRobot to strengthen its position as online marketplace provider. We want to ensure that the acquisition of iRobot by Amazon does not have a negative impact on businesses and consumers, by distorting competition on the relevant markets.” Margrethe Vestager, Executive Vice-President in charge of competition policy. 

Another significant concern raised by the Commission pertains to Amazon’s access to iRobot user data. The Commission fears that such data could provide Amazon with a competitive advantage over its rivals, potentially creating barriers to entry and expansion for current and future competitors.

The European Commission’s Authority

Similar to its counterpart in the United States, the Commission possesses the authority to block the proposed acquisition. In this case, the European Commission can halt the deal if it determines that it would have negative consequences for competition. It is important to note that iRobot’s stock remained relatively unchanged following the announcement of the probe.

Background and Implications

Amazon’s pursuit of the iRobot acquisition is part of the company’s broader strategy to expand its presence in the smart home market. Last year, Amazon announced the $1.7 billion deal as a means to diversify its portfolio of smart devices, which already includes the popular Alexa voice assistant, smart thermostats, security devices, and wall-mounted smart displays.

The acquisition has faced scrutiny from various antitrust regulators worldwide, reflecting growing concerns over Big Tech’s acquisition of smaller competitors. Regulators are increasingly worried about the concentration of vast amounts of data in the hands of a few dominant companies, as well as the potential exploitation of their market dominance to enter new markets.

Collaboration with Other Competition Authorities

The European Commission has highlighted its close cooperation with other competition authorities throughout the investigation process. This collaboration aims to ensure a comprehensive assessment of the potential impact of the acquisition. It is essential to emphasize that the initiation of an in-depth inquiry does not prejudge the ultimate outcome of the investigation.

Amazon’s Response

An Amazon spokesperson stated that the company is committed to working through the European Commission’s process and addressing any concerns or questions that arise during the investigation. Amazon believes that the deal could offer iRobot the resources necessary to accelerate innovation, invest in critical features, and potentially lower prices for consumers.

You Might Also Like

Warner Bros Discovery to Split in Two, Shakeup in the Media Industry

Djokovic’s Players’ Association Sues Tennis Organizers Over Antitrust Violations

The Future of BBVA’s Takeover of Sabadell Rests with the Spanish Government

Greencore Increases Takeover Bid for Bakkavor

Millicom’s Acquisition of Movistar Colombia: Reshaping the Telecommunications Landscape

TAGGED:acquisitionamazonantitrustbig techcompetitioneuropean commissionIRobot Rumba

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Zalando’s EU Court Loss Harmless; Real Threats Are Weak Demand, Shein and Temu

Editorial
Editorial
September 4, 2025
Covestro’s 10% Drop: Merger Arbitrage Opportunity or Value Trap?
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?