Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Reading: EU Fines Meta €797 Million for Antitrust Violations Linked to Facebook Marketplace
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

EU Fines Meta €797 Million for Antitrust Violations Linked to Facebook Marketplace

Editorial
Last updated: March 10, 2025 9:45 am
Editorial
Published November 16, 2024
Share

The European Commission has imposed a record-breaking €797.72 million fine on Meta, the parent company of Facebook, for violating antitrust regulations by leveraging its dominant position in the social media market.

Contents
The Basis of the FineMeta’s Defense and AppealA Broader Antitrust ContextImplications for Big Tech
Photo by Muhammad Asyfaul on Unsplash

This landmark decision marks the first instance of Meta being penalized under EU competition laws.

The Basis of the Fine

The fine stems from Meta’s integration of its online classified ads platform, Facebook Marketplace, into its flagship social network. According to the Commission, Facebook users are automatically granted access to Marketplace and are regularly exposed to it, regardless of their preferences. This “tying” practice gives Marketplace a distribution advantage that its competitors cannot match, the Commission stated. By embedding Marketplace into its platform, Meta has created significant barriers for rival online classified ads services.

In addition to tying practices, the Commission accused Meta of imposing unfair trading conditions on other online classified ads providers advertising on Facebook and Instagram. Specifically, Meta allegedly utilized data generated by competitors—both directly and indirectly from user clicks—to enhance its own services. This practice, the EU argued, represents an abuse of market power, further stifling competition.

Meta’s Defense and Appeal

Meta has contested the EU’s findings, arguing that the decision lacks evidence of harm to competition or consumers. In a statement, the company highlighted the dynamic nature of the online classified ads market, noting the presence of strong competitors like eBay, Leboncoin, and Subito. Meta plans to appeal the ruling while complying with the order to modify its practices, including untying Marketplace from Facebook and providing users with greater choice.

A Broader Antitrust Context

This fine is part of a broader trend of increased scrutiny on Big Tech by regulators worldwide. In the United States, Meta is also facing legal challenges over its acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp. A U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) lawsuit alleges that Meta purchased these platforms to eliminate emerging competition, thereby consolidating its monopoly in social media. A judge recently ruled that the case could proceed, emphasizing that Meta must answer for its anticompetitive practices.

At the EU level, the fine against Meta reflects an intensifying regulatory focus on curbing monopolistic practices in the tech sector. The investigation into Facebook Marketplace began in 2021 and uncovered significant evidence of market distortion and unfair practices. The ruling sends a strong message about the consequences of abusing dominant positions in digital markets.

Implications for Big Tech

The Meta ruling is one of several high-profile antitrust cases targeting major tech companies. Amazon, Apple, and Google are all under investigation or litigation for allegedly anti-competitive practices. These cases highlight a global push to restore competition and foster innovation in digital markets.

As the trial in the FTC’s case against Meta progresses and the EU ruling potentially reshapes how the company operates in Europe, the broader tech ecosystem is watching closely. The outcomes of these cases may redefine the boundaries of acceptable behavior for dominant digital platforms and set a precedent for future regulatory actions.

You Might Also Like

Slovak Antimonopoly Office Issues First-Ever Fine for Labour Market Collusion

EU Antitrust Chief Engages in High-Stakes Discussions with Tech Titans

Google Urges Trump DOJ to Reconsider Breakup Efforts

Musk’s xAI Sues Apple, OpenAI Over AI Competition

Google Admits Anti-Competitive Conduct in Australia, Faces $55 Million Penalty

TAGGED:antitrustbig techEuropean Comissionfacebookftcmeta

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Covestro’s 10% Drop: Merger Arbitrage Opportunity or Value Trap?

Editorial
Editorial
September 9, 2025
Zalando’s EU Court Loss Harmless; Real Threats Are Weak Demand, Shein and Temu
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?